Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
13 comments
Perhaps the tickets with no name were fakes?
Or maybe corporate tickets...
So will it be a Sky Sports (i.e. paid for) broadcast only? Or is it going to be on Eurosport (or even BBC)?
Sky tickets?
Thats a thing now?
May begin to explain why they were so expensive in the first place.
"Believe in better (profit margins)"
Nope, it's what's known as a 'white label', a company's branding on a ticket agency's system.
Yeah, clamp the fdown!
Who cares!
those that have paid £300 perhaps ???? any hoo, it'll be on the telly so that's
me sorted
Don't really need a ticket, if they need you to bring proof of purchase and ID.
Hmmm, If I had bought a ticket for £300 off eBay and read that essentially my ticket was not valid and I'd wasted all that money I would be mighty p*ssed off. I wonder if the original terms and conditions made having ID and original proof of purchase a condition of entry - and if not, are they able to retrospectively apply it?
I think they should have made it loud and clear that the tickets couldn't be sold on, but if they do state in the Ts & Cs that they are non transferable, then they are well within their rights to enforce it.
But the tickets do not have your name on them!
Sound like they messed up initially, are panicking because of the demand and are backtracking...
Anyone wanna buy a spare ticket?
They didn't mess up. The original article about tickets selling for up to £300 was incorrect in stating that the tickets did not have the purchaser's name on them; they do. I know 'cos I've got two and they are not for sale.
I read the headline and thought Wiggo was now claiming he was going to get a ticket he'll be going so fast