Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Drug driver told to expect jail for killing cyclist

"Cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands" says local councillor...

A drug driver has been told he should expect a jail sentence for killing a cyclist, with a local councillor noting that "cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the roads”.

Akash Rashid, 22, pleaded guilty to causing the death of a cyclist in Cottingley, Bingley.

At Bradford Crown Court this week he admitted four charges relating to an incident last July in which cyclist Dr Andrew Platten, 55, died.

Rashid was driving his Vauxhall Vectra without a licence, without insurance and while unfit through drugs. He was attempting to escape from a police chase when he mowed down Dr Platten.

West Yorkshire Police said officers had tried to stop the car after seeing the driver "acting suspiciously".

The case has been adjourned till February 15, but the judge said: "You must now anticipate a sentence of imprisonment.”

According to the Telegraph and Argus, Cllr Simon Cooke said: "It is good that the matter is closed. It is good news for the family.

"It is pleasing that the person has admitted it and I am sure he will be suitably punished.

"It is a real lesson for us all to be as tough as possible on people who drive dangerously and under the influence of drugs or alcohol or whatever."

He added: "Cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the roads.

"It is important the system is vigilant to incidents like this."

Rashid was granted bail until the sentencing date.

Dr Platten worked at Leeds Beckett University, where he worked in the Faculty of Arts, Environment and Technology.

In a statement, his family said: "Andrew excelled as a respected and dedicated academic, with a love for art, poetry and music. For anyone that knew him, cycling was his true passion as he became a recognised competitive rider on the roads.

"Most importantly he was a loved friend, loyal brother and uncle, loving partner and a truly inspirational father. He will be deeply missed, but he has left his stamp on all who met him.

"He will always be cherished and never forgotten, living on in all our hearts."

 

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes

Gee ... there's a liberal everywhere you turn on this website.

The irony is that his driving ban, probably about four years, will probably run concurrent with his four years or therabouts prison sentence. (And yes I know he never even had a driving licence in the first place).

Ban killers from the road for life. Mandatory prison sentence if a banned driver is ever caught driving. And then if they were driving while banned they would at least be bloody careful.

Avatar
atgni replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes
Valbrona wrote:

his driving ban, probably about four years, will probably run concurrent with his four years or therabouts prison sentence. (And yes I know he never even had a driving licence in the first place).

That bit changed a year or so back. Now driving bans start after 50% of the prison time served (as most only serve 1/2 the prison time).

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
1 like

Valbrona wrote:

Gee ... there's a liberal everywhere you turn on this website.

The irony is that his driving ban, probably about four years, will probably run concurrent with his four years or therabouts prison sentence. (And yes I know he never even had a driving licence in the first place).

Ban killers from the road for life. Mandatory prison sentence if a banned driver is ever caught driving. And then if they were driving while banned they would at least be bloody careful.

Not everyone who disagrees with a katie hopkins style short-sighted knee-jerk reactionary dogmatism is a liberal you know - I would certainly be pro capital punishment if it was reserved for sanctimonious bigots in an attempt to weed out the hypocritically stupid among us.

Avatar
Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes

So I get it. You think as long as this man has done his prison sentence and comes out of prison and applies for a provisional licence and passes his test and acts like a good boy and becomes a Pizza Hut delivery driver or a mini-cab driver ... that is okay. Me, I'd rather such individuals receive a lifetime ban from the roads; which of course still gives people like this the opportunity of driving illegally as any imbecile with half a brain would be able to work out. Better the opportunity of these people on day being legally able to drive taken away from them for life.

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes

Valbrona wrote:

So I get it. You think as long as this man has done his prison sentence and comes out of prison and applies for a provisional licence and passes his test and acts like a good boy and becomes a Pizza Hut delivery driver or a mini-cab driver ... that is okay. Me, I'd rather such individuals receive a lifetime ban from the roads; which of course still gives people like this the opportunity of driving illegally as any imbecile with half a brain would be able to work out. Better the opportunity of these people on day being legally able to drive taken away from them for life.

you seem to put a lot of faith in the free will of the individual - surely the whole point is to get him to "act like a good boy"?

unfortunately, most issues of road safety and the culture of disaffected youth are systemic problems, so an overly punititve approach to individuals will only serve to further alienate and criminalise them - do you really want to promote a culture where people such as this really feel they have nothing left to lose?

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to beezus fufoon | 7 years ago
0 likes
beezus fufoon wrote:

unfortunately, most issues of road safety and the culture of disaffected youth are systemic problems, so an overly punititve approach to individuals will only serve to further alienate and criminalise them - do you really want to promote a culture where people such as this really feel they have nothing left to lose?

The reason I don't entirely agree with you is that I think there are other issues involved. One can be entirely unenthusiastic about an 'overly punitive approach to individuals' _in general_, but still be unhappy about the general message being sent when certain categories of crime are treated noticably more leniently than are others.

Not only is it very much my subjective impression that offences are treated far more softly when the weapon involved is a car, it has been shown to be the case in at least one academic study that sentences for such offences have gotten shorter over the same time that sentences for other offences have gotten longer.

It's similar to how it makes one suspicious as to what is the underlying message when violent sexual offences against women get shorter sentences than do non-violent cases of theft or fraud. (I don't think this problem is quite as bad as it used to be in previous decades, but I'm not sure its gone away yet ).

What one thinks about punitive sentences in general is a different subject from what different standards of sentencing says about society's biases, and people can get upset about that.

Its also a different subject from what one thinks might be the best way to solve the problems caused by our transport system. Which isn't going to be fixed by locking up bad drivers one-at-a-time (and, sadly, "kill them all, let God sort them out" doesn't seem to be politically possible, so infrastructure it is then)

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 7 years ago
0 likes

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

beezus fufoon wrote:

unfortunately, most issues of road safety and the culture of disaffected youth are systemic problems, so an overly punititve approach to individuals will only serve to further alienate and criminalise them - do you really want to promote a culture where people such as this really feel they have nothing left to lose?

The reason I don't entirely agree with you is that I think there are other issues involved. One can be entirely unenthusiastic about an 'overly punitive approach to individuals' _in general_, but still be unhappy about the general message being sent when certain categories of crime are treated noticably more leniently than are others.

Not only is it very much my subjective impression that offences are treated far more softly when the weapon involved is a car, it has been shown to be the case in at least one academic study that sentences for such offences have gotten shorter over the same time that sentences for other offences have gotten longer.

It's similar to how it makes one suspicious as to what is the underlying message when violent sexual offences against women get shorter sentences than do non-violent cases of theft or fraud. (I don't think this problem is quite as bad as it used to be in previous decades, but I'm not sure its gone away yet ).

What one thinks about punitive sentences in general is a different subject from what different standards of sentencing says about society's biases, and people can get upset about that.

Its also a different subject from what one thinks might be the best way to solve the problems caused by our transport system. Which isn't going to be fixed by locking up bad drivers one-at-a-time (and, sadly, "kill them all, let God sort them out" doesn't seem to be politically possible, so infrastructure it is then)

yes, I agree with you in the main - in any situation where you let minimally trained people operate heavy machinery, unsupervised, and around a lot of others with little or no protection, then it's pretty obvious what the result will be - the focus on individuals here simply avoids this issue, although it does give us all a reason to feel morally superior and pontificate on the matter.

It is desirable to have consistency with sentencing, however, as you point out, the underlying message reinforces existing social biases - my point is that these biases go completely unnoticed and unquestioned by this fabrication of moral outrage directed against individual perpetrators as if they are abberations rather than symptomatic of the wider issues here.

Avatar
mike the bike | 7 years ago
1 like

 

Meanwhile, in the west country, a woman driver who killed a motorcyclist whilst out of her head on drugs receives a suspended sentence and a paltry four-year ban.  This guy has hopes yet .....

Avatar
Stumps | 7 years ago
1 like

After sitting in Crown Court on many an occasion this is something that most judges say to defendants, its not an out of the ordinary remark to be honest.

Obviously if you hear or read it for the first time its quite surprising considering he killed a man.

 

Avatar
oldstrath replied to Stumps | 7 years ago
0 likes

Stumps wrote:

After sitting in Crown Court on many an occasion this is something that most judges say to defendants, its not an out of the ordinary remark to be honest.

Obviously if you hear or read it for the first time its quite surprising considering he killed a man.

 

Surprising is about right. Would have been nice to hear 'prepare never to be free again', but I suppose that's too much too hope for, after all he only killed one person.

Avatar
Man of Lard | 7 years ago
1 like

He should expect a custodial sentence and is then bailed?

Take him down and he can start on the sentence.

Avatar
Valbrona | 7 years ago
1 like

Lifetime ban.

Avatar
PaulBox replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
1 like

Valbrona wrote:

Lifetime ban.

That's not going to make much difference to somebody who was driving without a licence already...

Avatar
Valbrona replied to PaulBox | 7 years ago
0 likes

PaulBox wrote:

Valbrona wrote:

Lifetime ban.

That's not going to make much difference to somebody who was driving without a licence already...

Why not?

As a start anyone who has done what this person has should be banned from driving for the rest of their lifetime.

Note that even a driver who does not hold any type of driving licence, either full/provisional, can receive a driving ban. The thought of this man one day obtaining a provisional/full friving licence and taking to the roads is a worrying one.

Not sure what you don't get about that.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
2 likes
Valbrona wrote:

PaulBox wrote:

Valbrona wrote:

Lifetime ban.

That's not going to make much difference to somebody who was driving without a licence already...

Why not?

As a start anyone who has done what this person has should be banned from driving for the rest of their lifetime.

Note that even a driver who does not hold any type of driving licence, either full/provisional, can receive a driving ban. The thought of this man one day obtaining a provisional/full friving licence and taking to the roads is a worrying one.

Not sure what you don't get about that.

Because quite clearly this offender does not feel having a licence or insurance is necessary to drive, so banning him will not affect his behaviour at all.

Once he is out he will be driving again, the system needs a means of enforcing driving bans because at the moment the chances of being stopped while driving illegally are too low.

I don't believe for a second this was the first time he was driving illegally.

Avatar
davel replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes
Valbrona wrote:

PaulBox wrote:

Valbrona wrote:

Lifetime ban.

That's not going to make much difference to somebody who was driving without a licence already...

The thought of this man one day obtaining a provisional/full friving licence and taking to the roads is a worrying one.

Petrifying: he might get in a car and kill someone with it. Good job he's not taken to the roads already.

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to Valbrona | 7 years ago
0 likes

Valbrona wrote:

PaulBox wrote:

Valbrona wrote:

Lifetime ban.

That's not going to make much difference to somebody who was driving without a licence already...

Why not?

As a start anyone who has done what this person has should be banned from driving for the rest of their lifetime.

Note that even a driver who does not hold any type of driving licence, either full/provisional, can receive a driving ban. The thought of this man one day obtaining a provisional/full friving licence and taking to the roads is a worrying one.

Not sure what you don't get about that.

maybe he should also receive a ban from doing illegal drugs?

Avatar
beezus fufoon | 7 years ago
0 likes

I'm amazed at the phrase, "cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the roads” - the councillor seems to have not noticed the everyday conditions outside of his own mind - only now that the evil junkie has been brought to justice can he can go back to his fantasy of aiming to become the mayor of trumpton!

Avatar
psling replied to beezus fufoon | 7 years ago
3 likes

beezus fufoon wrote:

I'm amazed at the phrase, "cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the roads” - the councillor seems to have not noticed the everyday conditions outside of his own mind... 

I agree with him. Cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the road.

Where I don't agree with him and believe that he is being incredibly naive though is when he comments "It is pleasing that the person has admitted it and I am sure he will be suitably punished". I am equally sure that they won't be suitably punished.

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to psling | 7 years ago
0 likes

psling wrote:

beezus fufoon wrote:

I'm amazed at the phrase, "cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the roads” - the councillor seems to have not noticed the everyday conditions outside of his own mind... 

I agree with him. Cyclists should not be expected to take their lives in their hands every time they set out on the road.

Where I don't agree with him and believe that he is being incredibly naive though is when he comments "It is pleasing that the person has admitted it and I am sure he will be suitably punished". I am equally sure that they won't be suitably punished.

sure, by taking it out of context it does make sense, especially in an area with so many boy racers - but that's not what he intended, rather, he seems to believe that the road conditions for cyclists in that area are ordinarily quite acceptable, which is almost the exact opposite of what you said here.

Avatar
Carmic0 | 7 years ago
1 like

Amazed at the Judge's choice of words.   This shunt will only get a couple of years for this crime.   Soft a shite 'justice' system.   He should get five years for the lesser offences, and another ten years for the death of the Dr.

Avatar
Critchio | 7 years ago
5 likes

Anticipate a sentence? Anticipate? What the fook is becoming of our justice system and its Judges? He should have been told he will face a long prison sentence. This cnut needs locking ups for 20 years. No licence, no insurance, failed to stop for police so dangerous driving then killed and innocent man. The guy needs to be hit by a train the day he walks out of prison in 20 years.

Why are we so lenient on people that kill?

Avatar
1961BikiE | 7 years ago
5 likes

Condolences to the family.

IMHO if you're "only" driving uninsured and unlicensed you should expect to serve a prison sentence. How can a "ban" be of any use against folk who do this. You can't ban someone who has no license!

Avatar
pockstone | 7 years ago
9 likes

'A drug driver has been told he should expect a jail sentence for killing a cyclist,'...

does he really need to be told that?!

Sad condolences to Dr. Platten's family.

Seeing the offender's photo in the local rag, one wonders what the hell he has to smile about!

Latest Comments