Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Millions of pounds set aside for cycling in England to be spent instead on walking, buses and car clubs

DfT announces local authorities winning cash from Local Transport Access Fund for coming years

Millions of pounds of the £300 million set aside by the government to be spent on cycling in England during the lifetime of the current parliament will instead go on initiatives such as promoting walking to school or work, providing real-time information at bus stops and encouraging people to use car clubs.

That’s the gist of an announcement made today by the Department for Transport (DfT) as it revealed which local authorities outside London would share £64 million in local transport funding for a variety of projects.

The DfT makes clear that the cash is “part of a wider government package of more than £300 million to boost walking and cycling during the current parliament.”

That money was announced by former Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), published in November 2015 following the Conservative Party’s victory in that year’s general election.

> What does Comprehensive Spending Review say about cycling?

Referring to funding for cycling in England outside London, the CSR said: “This settlement [to the DfT] also commits more than £300 million to cycling investment between 2015-16 and 2020-21.”

That figure itself included the previously announced £114 million funding under the Cycle City Ambition scheme, meaning that just £186 million was ‘new’ money – which when translated into annual spend per capita of population is around a tenth of the minimum £10 that campaigners have called for. While the per capita spend will be increased once match funding is taken into account, that would still only take it into the region of £2 per person each year.

CTC and Sustrans both said at the time that the amount of money pledged would make former Prime Minister David Cameron’s pre-election pledge to double levels of cycling impossible to achieve, and news that some of the money will be spent on other initiatives is bound to dismay campaigners even further.

And now, road.cc can reveal that by no means all of that money set aside will actually be spent on cycling.

In past announcements regarding funds allocated under the Local Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF) – now renamed the Sustainable Transport Access Fund – the DfT has provided brief details of each individual scheme.

However, it has told road.cc that such information is not available with respect to this wave of funding.

By checking details of some individual bids, however, we have been able to establish that much of the money will go towards initiatives unrelated to cycling.

That’s acknowledged by the DfT itself, which in its press release says the cash will be spent on initiatives including:

- more safety and awareness training for cyclists
- extra secure cycle storage
- bike repair and maintenance courses
- road safety measures
- mapping information for pedestrians
- real time bus information through smart phone apps or information at bus stops
- increased focus on car sharing clubs.

The largest amount – £7.5 million – goes to Sheffield City Region. While we have been unable to find precise details of its current bid, an LSTF award last year went towards ongoing projects “including loans for electric bikes, cycle training and a programme to make HGVs, buses, coaches and vans more fuel efficient” – not exclusively on cycling, then.

A similar amount goes to a consortium of 10 local authorities across England, led by Blackpool Council, for an existing initiative delivered by the walking charity Living Streets to encourage people to walk to schools or workplaces.

There is one reference to “cycling” in this document produced by the council in relation to the bid, but it is clear the focus is on walking.

The next largest sum, £6.9 million, goes to a joint bid from four West of England councils – Bath and North East Somerset, Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire.

This document from Bristol City Council makes it clear that cash allocated under today’s announcement will be spent on initiatives not directly related to cycling:

The funding will continue to deliver a wide range of schemes including community, schools and business engagement activity. Some specific examples include support for family cycle training; school travel plans and match-funded grants for businesses to install onsite sustainable transport facilities.

The funding is also critical in maintaining levels of marketing/ communications support for sustainable transport, including the West of England’s transport website TravelWest. An element of this funding will be used to launch the MetroBus operation in the Westof England in 2017, and to provide good quality information at MetroBus stops.

Those are just three examples, but collectively those schemes account for getting on for a third of the money announced today, and we would expect similar findings in many of the other projects listed at the end of this article, with funding originally meant for cycling being given to other sustainable travel initiatives.

Announcing the funding today, transport minister Andrew Jones said: “We are committed to improving how people travel and this investment will ensure that people’s journeys are cheaper, safer and better for the environment. It will help people to become more active and better transport planning will reduce congestion on our roads – particularly at peak times.

“This investment will also help people access jobs, education and training - specifically targeting those looking to get back into work, as part of our relentless drive to make this is a country that works for everyone.”

Here is the list of local authorities that have been awarded Sustainable Travel Access Fund cash today.

£7.5m                    Sheffield City Region Combined Authority

£7.498m               Blackpool Council*

£6.901m               Bristol City Council (West of England)

£3.323m               Tees Valley Combined Authority

£3.322m               Southend-on-Sea BC joint bid with Thurrock Council and Essex CC

£3.195m               Leicester City Council and Leicestershire County Council

£2.735m               Nottingham City Council - joint bid with Derby CC and Nottinghamshire CC

£2.294m               Southampton City Council (joint bid with Hampshire County Council)

£2.128m               Luton BC (joint bid with Bedford BC and Central Bedfordshire Council)

£1.94m                 Lancashire County Council - Joint bid with Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

£1.5m                    Devon County Council

£1.5m                    Herefordshire County Council

£1.5m                    Slough Borough Council

£1.497m               Plymouth City Council

£1.488m               Norfolk County Council

£1.485m               Brighton and Hove Council

£1.452m               Kent County Council

£1.388m               North East Lincolnshire Council

£1.35m                 Isle of Wight Council

£1.312m               City of York

£1.2m                    East Sussex County Council

£0.975m               Lincolnshire County Council

£0.974m               North Yorkshire County Council

* Consortium bid with Bucks CC, Herts CC, North East CA, Stoke on Trent CC, W Sussex CC, Hants CC, Leicester CC, North Lincs Council and Surrey CC

In addition, three city regions share £3.8 million from the Cycling & Walking to Work Fund for the following 12 months to “connect people with employment and apprenticeships.”

Those are Greater Manchester Combined Authority and West Yorkshire Combined Authority, which each receive £1.5 million, and Liverpool City Region, which gets £0.77 million.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

22 comments

Avatar
matthewn5 | 7 years ago
1 like

"- more safety and awareness training for cyclists
- extra secure cycle storage
- bike repair and maintenance courses
- road safety measures"

3 of those are known to be the least effective means of getting people on bikes... really disappointing.

Avatar
Pub bike | 7 years ago
1 like

Many roads in urban areas have proper footways by the side of them that have been there for a long time, so pedestrians are relatively well supplied.  Cyclists on the other hand...

 

 2

Avatar
Onemanpeloton | 7 years ago
0 likes

Although not directly supporting cycling, any initiative that get's people out of their cars is a good one. And it still indirectly improves roads for cyclists by having fewer cars on them

Avatar
alansmurphy | 7 years ago
0 likes

Fair point Jeeves but...

 

In sunny Crewe where I live and work, there is a major train station, Bentley (a big employer) and a business park with >5,000 employees on it. They paid a company to run a fleet of new busses - leather seats, wifi etc. linking all of these places, a bus every 20 minutes. I used it twice in the year it ran for due to the cost to me being about £60 a month, er no thanks.

 

Cheshire East council ran a story in the local press a few months in talking about the miracle of 'x' thousand journeys by bus. When I broke it down by the number of busses on the road over the 13 hour period (because I'm like that) there were around 0.8 people per bus (probably including the driver).

 

The service has stopped and the bus company have some nice shiny busses. The percentage of people working on the business park that live close enough is tiny, services further out are dreadful and even more expensive. Oh and as the business park is on a former wildlife area there's restrictions on parking so everyone is on the grass verges and footpaths churning crap everywhere, it's a bloody disgrace!

 

I would love to see how they anticipate getting car sharing to work!

 

Avatar
stenmeister | 7 years ago
2 likes

I can't even think how 'walking initiatives' work. How is the money spent? How do they encourage people to go to a destination at a slower pace than their car? 

At least with a cycle lane, you might think 'Oh that's nice, now I can cycle safely into town'.

Avatar
kitsunegari | 7 years ago
1 like

I have no problem with £300m being spent on walking initatives, but it needs to be in addition to money spent on cycling.

Avatar
Edgeley | 7 years ago
1 like

Oxfordshire got a bundle last time.

It was spent on a "bike scheme" whose main beneficiaries were bus companies, and the promise of a bridge over the Thames from one towpath to a field.

Avatar
MikeFromLFE | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm pretty sure the Leicester/Leicestershire money will go on the real time bus information system that is so badly wanted.

if the money can be used to get cars off the road by encouraging walking and use of public transport, then that's fine by me, but don't call it 'cycling' money.

Avatar
JeevesBath replied to MikeFromLFE | 7 years ago
0 likes

MikeFromLFE wrote:

if the money can be used to get cars off the road by encouraging walking and use of public transport, then that's fine by me, but don't call it 'cycling' money.

As much as cycling infrastructure is underfunded, let's be clear it wasn't called 'cycling money' - it was called the Sustainable Transport Fund and now it's called Sustainable Transport Access Fund. 'Sustainable transport' includes more than just bicycles.

Avatar
brooksby replied to JeevesBath | 7 years ago
0 likes

JeevesBath wrote:

'Sustainable transport' includes more than just bicycles.

I'd never realised that 'sustainable transport' included buses and car clubs, though.

Avatar
JeevesBath replied to brooksby | 7 years ago
0 likes

brooksby wrote:

JeevesBath wrote:

'Sustainable transport' includes more than just bicycles.

I'd never realised that 'sustainable transport' included buses and car clubs, though.

from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_transport

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to JeevesBath | 7 years ago
1 like

JeevesBath wrote:

brooksby wrote:

JeevesBath wrote:

'Sustainable transport' includes more than just bicycles.

I'd never realised that 'sustainable transport' included buses and car clubs, though.

from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_transport

 

Oh, well, that's just silly.  Clearly I've been misunderstanding the word 'sustainable', because I'm pretty sure if you said 'sustainable transport' to your average Joe then they'd be thinking cycling and walking, not car clubs, car sharing, trams, and buses. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to MikeFromLFE | 7 years ago
1 like

MikeFromLFE wrote:

I'm pretty sure the Leicester/Leicestershire money will go on the real time bus information system that is so badly wanted.

We have a real time bus information system here in Bristol.  At each bus stop, a sign says the next bus and how many minutes away it is.

Unless the bus goes through a bad signal area in which case it disappears.

Or it is past it's due time, in which case it just disappears and the next bus is listed.

Or it has been unavoidably cancelled/delayed/attacked by hippos, in which case rather than a notice explaining this, it just disappears.

Complete waste of money IMO.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to brooksby | 7 years ago
0 likes

brooksby wrote:

MikeFromLFE wrote:

I'm pretty sure the Leicester/Leicestershire money will go on the real time bus information system that is so badly wanted.

We have a real time bus information system here in Bristol.  At each bus stop, a sign says the next bus and how many minutes away it is.

Unless the bus goes through a bad signal area in which case it disappears.

Or it is past it's due time, in which case it just disappears and the next bus is listed.

Or it has been unavoidably cancelled/delayed/attacked by hippos, in which case rather than a notice explaining this, it just disappears.

Complete waste of money IMO.

The London system seems to work quite well, although "[due in] 1 min" often seems to last a lot more than 60 seconds! The real benefit is being able to access this stuff online before you head for the bus stop. 

The difference in London is that the buses are run under contract to TfL. Conversely my recollection (admittedly out of date now) of Glasgow's privatised system  was much more like Bristol's. "Refer to timetable" was quite a common message!

Avatar
ChairRDRF | 7 years ago
1 like

There is nothing actually new here about the allocation of money - just who gets it. The issue now is how much gets spent on cycling infrasructure and other emasures to help cycling. This needs close examination, preferably from people living in these places.

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like

I knew Bristol had to find money from *somewhere* to try and plug the gaping financial hole created by the Metrobus project (which I will never use, despite working in Bristol*); I'm kinda disappointed that it's cycling money that they've stolen/borrowed/diverted, though.

 

*edit. Not by choice but because Metrobus goes from a point in the south of the city up through the centre to a point in the north. And I live and work in the west.

Avatar
srchar | 7 years ago
11 likes

There is plenty of research concluding that people are reluctant to cycle because the infrastructure isn't safe. New infrastructure costs money.

But, walking? Surely the only reason able people don't walk short distances is because they are too lazy? What is n% of £300m going to do for walking?

Avatar
LDR | 7 years ago
3 likes

Would not mind if they if they used it to repair the dangerous roads!!

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 7 years ago
1 like

Money spent on walking is fine with me.  But let's not kid ourselves.  £300m won't pay for anything important.  My local council spent almost £100,000 widening a pavement along a half mile section of road.  And they still gave way to vehicles at the one junction on that road.

My opinion is that we even though I don't live anywhere near London, that's where the focus should be.  Let everyone see that a huge busy city can handle hundreds of thousands of cyclists.  Then perhaps other cities will follow suit (tbh they already are, look at Manchester and Leicester for instance).

Avatar
riotgibbon | 7 years ago
1 like

but we did get a cycle hire scheme that no one uses though

Avatar
riotgibbon | 7 years ago
0 likes

I know my area, Slough, has already had a big chunk of this cash. They're spending it on road "improvements" without any cycle lanes. Not even advisory lanes or ASLs ...

Avatar
riotgibbon | 7 years ago
1 like

I know my area, Slough, has already had a big chunk of this cash. They're spending it on road "improvements" without any cycle lanes. Not even advisory lanes or ASLs ...

Latest Comments