Is riding a bike on the road in the UK a “very safe activity”?
While the evidence of dangerous driving often featured on this very site would suggest otherwise, that’s the opinion of John Franklin, the author of cycling skills manual Cyclecraft, which forms the basis of Bikeability, the UK’s national standard for cycle training.
In the quick-fire Q&A section of the latest edition of Cycling UK’s magazine Cycle, Franklin was asked – among other things, such as ‘Who mends your punctures?’, ‘Lycra or normal clothes?’ – “what single thing would most improve matters for UK cyclists?”
“More self-confidence among cyclists and less exaggeration of ‘danger’,” he said. “Cycling on roads is actually a very safe activity.”
That answer, unsurprisingly, has divided cyclists on the internet, it appears.
> "Road safety remains the biggest barrier to more people cycling": Research suggests more than two thirds of Scots think not feeling safe is main barrier to cycling
“I was mulling on this as I rode home tonight while I avoided a pincer movement by one van blocking the cycle lane that I was in and another turning right in front of me,” Singletrack World forum user Mr Sparkle said in response to Franklin’s Q&A claim.
“Followed immediately by a car driver parked on wrong side of the road and so unsighted, pulling out on me. I’m 62 and been cycling since I was about seven. I ride pretty much five days a week year-round and have been doing so for years.
“I’d class myself as an experienced and confident road user (cyclist, full motorcycle and car licence etc, etc). I have lost count of the times over the years where I’ve come very close to being injured or worse through no fault of mine.
“I would argue that, while self-confidence (if you have the sense and experience to back it up), is great – I don’t see it as being the ‘single thing that would most improve matters for UK cyclists’.
“A massive cultural change where drivers are required to be tested more frequently and suffer greater punishment in court for road crimes that they have been found guilty of would be higher up the list.”
“It’s a bit like asking why the zookeeper insists on all the lions being locked away before going in to clean the enclosure and suggesting that if they just had a bit more self-confidence, they’d be fine,” agreed Crazy Legs.
“It’s a shitty attitude and one that is responsible for a significant failing in ever increasing the number of people cycling.”
> “Some drivers see safe cycling as a character flaw”: The fight for fewer close passes
However, not everyone believed the Cyclecraft author (who, of course, makes a strong case for riding in primary position in his guide) had missed the mark.
“I think I agree with him that the danger of cycling on the road is a bit over exaggerated, and in the sense that I think more cyclists on the roads = slightly safer for everyone, and that it doesn’t help to be putting people off riding,” said another forum user.
“But definitely agree with you that it’s way down the list of answers I’d give. Charitably, there’s not a lot of space for his answer and I guess the first part of his answer he’s wearing his Cyclecraft cap and advocating for more training.”
“He has a very good point,” argued Scot Routes. “Too many folk are put off by an exaggeration of the dangers (often on social media).
“The more cyclists there are, the more ‘usual’ it will be for motorists to see cyclists on the road and the better the infrastructure provision will become. The Field of Dreams approach (build it and they will come) has been only partially successful as it sends a message that shared infrastructure isn’t for cyclists.”
> "Justice needs to provide protection": Cyclist close passed by wife of ex-Scotland footballer, before filming driver use phone and run red light, criticises Scottish courts' "very obvious issues" after "ludicrously lenient" punishment
“I understand the sentiment but probably badly worded,” another user said.
“Confidence/assertiveness link to positioning on the road, and I found doing Bikeability a few years back that my positioning wasn’t as good as I thought it was. Getting that right and being more proactive on the road led to fewer close passes.
“And I think because we are aware of how vulnerable we are on the road, we overestimate the actual danger to us at an individual level. I know two people who’ve been killed while riding in 40 years. I know more who’ve died unexpectedly young from other causes.
“Cycling is relatively safe. I have no more concerns about my kids cycling on the road than I do of them driving now they’ve passed their tests.”
> The guilt, the danger and the dichotomy of being a cycling parent
Meanwhile, KCR said: “It’s a quick-fire format interview, and he was asked to pick one thing, so I wouldn’t read too much into it. I’m sure he would have more to say on the subject if he was interviewed at length.
“I think one of the things that would improve matters most would be to get more cyclists on the road (and I’m including cycling infrastructure when I say ‘road’).
“If more people were cycling, it would reduce the ‘othering’ of cyclists and make them an expected part of the transport system that motorists would be more likely to look out for.
“One of the things that deters many people from using a bike for transport is a lack of confidence and a perception that it really is a dangerous thing to do, so Franklin has a point.”
What do you think? Does Franklin have a point? Is self-confidence the key to being safe on the roads? Or is it way down the pecking order on the list of things that keep cyclists safe?
Add new comment
49 comments
Franklin is out of touch with reality in the world of road cycling. The number of people killed or ending up in emergency rooms, the existence of and building of new and better bike paths are strong, unknowable testaments to the dangers. There also is a strong hate relationship from many drivers toward cyclists. But thank for posting his claims and attitude I will no longer feel any need to read any of his writings. I have been riding a bike much longer than he and witness the reality daily.
The evidence in the Netherlands doesn't care what Franklin thinks or says.
For clarity... are we saying that vehicular cycling is *good* or *bad*?
I take control of the lane; I'm in the outside of the lane when passing parked vehicles or turning right.
I ride primary and rarely ride secondary - especially in urban areas where there are lots of minor side roads or driveways ... thus giving me space to maneuver and them [in theory] time to react.
I've found that my road position doesn't affect the number of close passes I get ... I just feel a teensy bit safer when I'm in the middle of the lane, with nothing to my inside, when Richard close passes me in his Dick Mobil.
So ... is the consensus here that I'm wrong to be aggressively demanding the same space as I would get in my car?
You'd have to try hugging the gutter and seeing how that makes you feel I guess - plus see if you get more / worse passing? And how many times you crash because of all the rubbish and metal grates / covers / tarmac trashed by buses.
For the full comparison you'd have to repeat but changing your attitude so that you were not confident, then try taking the lane and not "quickly accellerating to a moderate speed of 20mph" after junctions. (Perhaps ride a cargo bike, with a child attached)?
Certainly some of the techniques propounded by the VC folks are of use where you'll be interacting with lots of (fast) motor traffic. However the whole thing seems to be a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. (I guess they might say it had nothing to do with getting more people cycling, it was just techniques for those that do ... but they did go further than that).
Ignoring the elitist stance taken by some of its proponents (and possibly turning it into something they didn't intend!) the other issue is that this is never going to be an acceptable way of riding for most people, never mind attractive *. So it won't lead to many more people doing so.
And that's why where infra prioritises drivers we see people cycling like this - but don't see many of them. And in the few places where the infra also makes cycling more pleasant ** we see lots of people cycling but not riding "like they were driving cars".
* In fact surveys indicate that lots of people just don't want to ride with a lot of motor traffic, or large vehicles, or with much faster ones. In fact even most seasoned UK cyclists much prefer riding on empty roads...
** And - to be complete - makes driving some journeys (especially short ones) slightly less convenient, to give people a push to walk, cycle or use public transport!
I can safely say that the only time I've *ever* quickly accelerated to 20mph has been on a steep downward facing hill.
I would absolutely *love* to have a 20mph average ... even with the motor on the e-bike I struggle to consistently get above 14.5mph average.
I'm happy to admit that yes, I do change my riding when on segregated paths ... but only where the segregation is total [such as Bathgate to Caldercruix, Balerno to Ball Green via The Waters of Leith or when gravel riding].
The big change in my riding came after getting hit and left with life changing injuries [you'll all be bored hearing about them by now ...]
I stopped being timid and started being more forceful, more precise in my intentions ... like I said, it doesn't change the number of close passes, but at least I know I've got bailout room.
I'm not an ambassador for cycling - although I do lead Club group rides. I encourage people to ride a bike ... if they want to.
I don't subscribe to the whole "how do you guess if someone cycles? You don't need to... they'll soon tell you". I don't see cycling as a religious calling [unlike some seem to on here] and I also don't see cyclists as faultless, innocent, blameless little lambs [again, unlike some on here].
I ride a bike because I like to, it keeps me reasonably fit [and its the best exercise I can do following the collision], and I get to see parts of this beautiful countryside that I'd never see otherwise.
Oh ...and the scones at Clubbiedeans...
Took a while to sink in but I think years of doing a regular "just getting places / doing errands" riding on the North Edinburgh paths has had that Netherlands effect on me. At least - I have my helmet from when I first moved to Edinburgh over a decade ago (which I always wore), but I realised a while back I couldn't actually recall the last time I'd put it on. (I think it was a Ride to the Sun from Carlisle to Cramond a few years ago).
Amen to all that!
I cycle into City of London daily from the suburbs and have done for 20 odd or so years and as such have had a fair few run ins and accidents, none my fault. I would say I'm a very confident cyclist.
My colleagues at work think I'm mad and often cite people in cars being dangerous as to why they would not even contemplate doing it.
So the question is how do you become confident if the percieved danger puts you off from even attempting it ?
In London as in the rest of the UK the provision for cycling is hapazard at best , often leaving the cyclist in the most dangerous of places with zero protection. How often does a nice wide road with cycle provision suddenly stop when the road narrows or a 2 lane roundabout start ? And please dont get me started on the highways agency and their woeful cycle provision on A roads.
I commute on my bike because I love cycling and take the 'risk' that comes with it - but that risk is very real and very much in evidence on every commute, that is not the case if I chose to drive my car and it is not something that a child just cycling to school should be open to. Basically if you would not let your child cycle on the road that that road is inherently unsafe, and that basicallly is vast majority of roads in london (i dont cycle outside so can speak for other places but wld guess its a similar experience).
We all know the answer, safe and seperate cycling provision but regretfully we are in the minority and petrol heads and carloonery are the order of the day. So people have to make an active choice to accept the risks for cycling otherwise they will not do it. Unsuprisingly, people are not willing to take that risk and instead buy a bigger car than last time because that make them feel 'safe'.
Sorry slightly longer than I intended but unfortunately until any goverment significantly changes the heiracy of road use people of bikes will always be at the bottom of the pile/consideration.
Re the Gavin and Stacey jersey I'm sorry to have to inform you that it's a real thing available on Amazon, made by the famous cycle clothing firm of X-CQREG and yours for the bargain price of £37 for a jersey and shorts combo...
With the popularity of the Gavin and Stacey series i can see this becoming a best seller : Buy now while stocks last !!!
Can you post a link ??
It can be viewed in all its glory here, happy shopping!
Thanks I predict a sell out lol
I hadn't realised that John Franklin was still alive. Much as his style of vehicular cycling does include some very useful tips, taken as a whole it seems like something from another age…
I'm not sure that's for a rider. Looks more like they've adopted a chimp as a mascot.
I actually do think that far too many people are overreacting to road riding with the old "everyone is trying to kill me" bolloxs.
Yeah, there is the occasional shit pass but they are so rare now that I actually remember them.
I find the vast majority of drivers safe and courteous.
That said, I don't ride at rush hour or in a big city.
Well there y'go, then
- the post-Mark period, if you will...
Fabulous. Well done sir.
Re. the 'cycling is dangerous' thing - it seems like maybe we need to define terms a bit. There are (at least) two ways to interpret the statement:
The former is somewhat complex, as has been picked over by others here. However, I find I encounter a fair amount of the latter, which is straightforwardly nonsense, and convincing a few less people to believe in it would be no bad thing.
Perhaps what we need to do is give these wankers a sense of perspective. I am going to start following them around randomly and threating them with my fist or jumping out from behind things and screaming at them.
Its OK though because I won't actually punch them very often and being scared isn't actually dangerous. They would just need a sense of perspective and need to understand that they aren't going to get hurt that often. Its just the threat of violence. Nothing to worry about.
Thats what being a cyclist is. People constantly scaring you and threatening you with their cars.
Ah but "we have to drive"... so it's a normal activity and assumed to be innocuous so you will need some plausible deniability for your tailgating, jumping out at them and fist-waving!
John Franklyn is as unbalanced as he always is. He has half the case, but ignores the other half, which is for people who are not like him.
That purple strip is peculiar. It reminds me of two things:
1 - The England football strip some years ago that caused them not to be able to see each other.
2 - Torville & Dean's outfits in Bolero.
This was written over a decade ago, and still rings true today: https://departmentfortransport.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/fuck-you-john-fr...
Plus ça change...
Ranty Highwayman has similarly 'strong' views on Franklin
Yeah, saw the name and had a "great dinosaurs of the past" moment (more here, and the "grandad of the movement" here).
Seems the vehicular cycling ideology is still alive in the US (indeed seems oddly popular amongst ex-pat UK folks there also). There are reasons for that (US culture - not just "car culture" either). But these folks just sound antediluvian in the light of progress made for "nicer places" and "mass cycling" in Europe.
As always there are some elements of truth on both sides. The VC folks did promote some helpful "survival techniques" (like taking the lane) - helpful if you're taking on the traffic. And cycling is statistically a very safe mode of transport in the UK - which has one of the safer road environments overall (especially when compared to the US).
However I'd suggest there is still too much road death, injury and definitely too much intimidation (deliberate or just thoughtless) by motorised road users. What I think isn't so important though - one of the reasons (reported in many surveys) that most people in the UK do not cycle (and particularly women, the young and the old) is that "it doesn't look / feel safe".
There are plenty of other non-"whatabout" reasons for the low fraction of trips cycled. We've made it not social, inconvenient (or at least less so than driving), cyclists are an "out group", there's a lack of safe places to park or store a bike, we already have cars. But without addressing "it doesn't look / feels safe" most people simply won't cycle. That's not sufficient, but necessary.
But then - "most people cycling" doesn't seem to be a big concern of vehicular cyclists. Indeed it seems (at least for some) it is predicated on a kind of elitism - the fit and the brave asserting their individuality and agency by cycling despite inconvenience, disapproval and danger.
I'd consider myself a fairly confident cyclist, normally feel safe,even when ive had at least 5 drivers try to drive into me this week and 1 shout abuse, but there was a moment last week where I just thought any moment the next driver is just going to hit me, it felt really sketchy in an unsafe way I've not felt for a long while riding in traffic.
Fortunately I made it home in one piece, so there's no stat recorded about it, no ksi data anyone can cite,not even any close pass submissions(too detailed to explain why,its not because there werent any) ,but it felt as unsafe as expletive.
Stiffer penalties for dangerous drivers, and stiffer penalties for people who use the expression 'over exaggerated'.
'Be more confident' is not going to help if people's experience is that drivers make it feel unpleasant and dangerous.
The figures speak for themselves really. 2% modal share where no infra is provided, 30%+ in places where cycling is properly provided for.
Cycling is pretty safe in the UK if you look at it statistically in terms of KSI, however a lot of that is down to the fact that regular cyclists know how to ride defensively and watch out for bad driving; it's a very rare ride in London when there isn't at least one incident where I would probably have been hit if I hadn't anticipated that a driver was going to do something stupid and/or illegal. Cycling can only considered to be truly safe when you don't have to ride continually on edge. At the moment it's rather as if there was a high crime neighbourhood but the vast majority of residents had learned how to spot and avoid the criminals and modify their behaviour so they didn't become victims, rather than the authorities having done anything to strike at the root causes of the crime - great, it's a fairly safe area but only because everyone is living in fear.
Exactly - cyclists will receive lots of "almost" incidents on most journeys.
The answer has always been for better road policing and for the courts to apply appropriate penalties.
Pages