Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Huge queues of cyclists on London’s Blackfriars Bridge due to security barriers

TfL reiterates that it is working with the Met to minimise disruption

Long queues of cyclists have been reported on Blackfriars Bridge resulting from the new barriers that were installed in the wake of the Westminster and London Bridge terror attacks. Thousands of cyclists are being forced to squeeze through one lane with three Transport for London (TfL) staff said to be on hand to manage the bottleneck.

Blackfriars Bridge lies on the capital’s North-South Cycle Superhighway, a hugely popular route during rush hour.

Huge metal and concrete bollards were recently installed at each end so that where previously people could ride two abreast in both directions, now there is only room for single file.

The position of the barriers at the south end lets cyclists travelling in opposite directions pass each other, the ones at the north end don’t.

A number of people have taken to social media to complain about the situation, including the BBC’s Tom Edwards.

A spokesman for London Cycling Campaign told the London Evening Standard that there was a “real safety risk” with cyclists being forced into “often quite fast traffic” as a result of the barriers.

He added: “These barriers had to go up very fast indeed. We hope that something can be done to modify or change them to provide security and not make things worse for cyclists.”

A TfL spokesperson merely repeated a previous statement, saying: “The Met has installed barriers to increase security on London’s busiest bridges. We are working with them to ensure that these barriers affect cyclists and pedestrians as little as possible, while ensuring the security of all road users.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
kie7077 | 6 years ago
0 likes

I've been there, they dumped down more barriers than necessary making it difficult for people to get through. It really is a wtf were they thinking situation. They need to take one of the barriers away and reposition the others a bit, they can do this whilst still blocking vehicles.

Avatar
Al__S | 6 years ago
1 like

1.8m gaps (the standard for bollards!) would block almost every car. 2m gaps would block trucks and make it hard for vans and cars (I go through 2m width restrictions on my way to work, motorists have to negotiate these very slowly).

A gap narrow enough to block a motorbike will block a cargo bike, a mobility trike, etc.

From the pictures I've seen, the gaps between the blocks are thoughlessly narrow. Vastly narrower than they need to be, creating congestion.

Avatar
ConcordeCX | 6 years ago
3 likes

That's part of my commute. I normally commute outside the busiest part of rush hour, and it's not too bad then. On Monday I was there at the very busiest time and it was horrendous.

It's not made better by the large number of people who think they're more important than the rest of us, and jump the queue, blocking on-coming cyclists, and giving the poor sods from Tfl who have to supervise this a hard time when they try to exert some discipline. People who do that are no better than the twats who jump motor traffic queues by speeding along the bus lane.

This is a shit measure, but it's temporary until they come up with something more discreet and effective. In the meantime, when stuck in it let's try and behave like reasonable adults.

 

Avatar
Crippledbiker | 6 years ago
8 likes

As I mentioned on a previous article, handcyclists don't fit through here at all - and we can't even dismount to go round!

Avatar
Alankk | 6 years ago
6 likes

Security theatre improves the appearance of safety

Avatar
zanf | 6 years ago
4 likes

Its daft because theyre only at the north end an you can still drive up onto the bridge from the south.

ALl they needed was one in the middle of the path on the north side and no car would be able to get on to the footpath/cycle lane. Instead some moron thinks putting 3 there will stamp out terrorism.

 

Avatar
STiG911 | 6 years ago
2 likes

Also worrisome is that people will injure themselves on the massive 'lugs' on each side used to lift them into place. Pedestrian or Cyclist, they're a real hazard.

Avatar
mistermoore | 6 years ago
0 likes

You'd just go on the road on that part of the commute surely. 

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 6 years ago
3 likes

Entirely predictable... I'm sure this will stop all terrorists though.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
4 likes

The flow across the bridge was already unnecessarily constrained due to the initially questionable traffic light phasing. That's  now unarguably stupid since there is no longer the option for vehicles to turn onto the Embankment - but the traffic lights still hold up north-and-southbound traffic as if there were.

Avatar
Grahamd | 6 years ago
9 likes

How long before cyclists say bollocks and use the road instead?

Avatar
jmaccelari | 6 years ago
6 likes

I don't get this. The terrorists are driving cars, not bicycles. Surely it makes more sense to block the main carriageway rather than the cycle lanes?

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to jmaccelari | 6 years ago
1 like
jmaccelari wrote:

I don't get this. The terrorists are driving cars, not bicycles. Surely it makes more sense to block the main carriageway rather than the cycle lanes?

Not sure you've though that comment through.

Avatar
Leviathan replied to Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
1 like
Duncann wrote:
jmaccelari wrote:

I don't get this. The terrorists are driving cars, not bicycles. Surely it makes more sense to block the main carriageway rather than the cycle lanes?

Not sure you've though that comment through.

I think he knows exactly what he is saying.

Latest Comments