Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Isle of Dogs fury that cyclists may be allowed to ride through Greenwich foot tunnel

Cycling is currently banned - despite the tunnel being part of a national cycle route

Residents of the Isle of Dogs in London have expressed anger that a local council plans to allow cyclists to ride through the north-south Greenwich foot tunnel.

Despite being a part of National Cycle Route 1, linking Inverness and Dover, cyclists are currently only allowed to walk their bikes through.

Greenwich Council, which is responsible for maintaining the tunnel, says that cyclists should be allowed to ride through at certain times, but Tower Hamlets Council, to whose territory the tunnel links, must agree to this, as it jointly owns the route.

Already, many cyclists choose to ignore the rules and ride through, despite many signs along the route, and locals say this easing of the law will only embolden them.

Some 1.5 million people use the tunnel every year, and at its peak accommodates 250 cyclists an hour.

Without using the tunnel, cyclists face an eight to ten-mile diversion to reach Canary Wharf from south London, although they could also use the Docklands Light Railway, where folded bikes are allowed at all times and non-folded bikes are permitted other than between 0730-0930 and 1600-1900 from Monday-Friday.

“Allowing cycling at certain times would send out a wrong signal to cyclists,” Tower Hamlets campaigning councillor Andrew Wood told the East London Advertiser.

“People tell us they won’t use the tunnel because of dangerous cycling, especially mums with prams.”

A public meeting on the Isle of Dogs agreed to send a deputation to Greenwich Council, complaining that no public consultation or Health and Safety analysis had yet been done.

Cllr Woods, representing Canary Wharf ward, ran a survey on August 1 which found 191 cyclists unlawfully riding through the tunnel in just 50 minutes, while 152 walked and eight ran with their bikes. There were 274 pedestrians in that time, including 31 children, as well as five mums with prams and one wheelchair disabled.

“Cyclists are their own worst enemy,” Cllr Woods added. “A small number of red-light dodgers abuse the system in the streets and we fear they’ll continue cycling in the tunnel.”

Cllr Peter Golds told last month’s Tower Hamlets Council meeting that the tunnel built in 1902 was never designed for cycling.

 

Add new comment

32 comments

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to ConcordeCX | 6 years ago
2 likes
ConcordeCX wrote:

StuInNorway wrote:

This may sound radical, but what about a new river crossing in East london then ? Between Tower bridge and the Dartford crossing there is exist almost no means to cross teh river on foot/by bike. This tunnel (too narrow to cycle anyway), Rotherhithe tunnel (too fume filled for most people to cycle and almost no cars stick to the 20mph limit. Blackwall (no peds or bikes allowed) , and the ferries.   London in is dire need of at least one, preferably 2 new crossings between Tower Bridge and the M25. Head west and you can throw stones off one bridge and hit the next.

 

There's also a tunnel at Woolwich.

A bridge between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf has been approved.

https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/how-we-work/planning-for-the-futu...

it's a lot easier and cheaper to build bridges upstream where it's shallower, and narrower and doesn't have to cater for large shipping.

Is the Woolwich one fully open now? Last times I was there - ages ago - the entrances were almost hidden behind builders hoardings, and the only reason I even knew it existed at all was due to dimly remembering it from childhood. And the lifts were sealed off so you had to use the stairs. Which were partly in darkness. I cycled through it as it seemed like nobody else even remembered it was there so not much chance of encountering any pedestrians. Kind of unnerving , really.

How come we could once just get on with it and build such things - under the river, no less - whereas now even _thinking about_ a poxy ornamental bridge costs tens of millions with nothing to show for it?

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 6 years ago
14 likes

Have been through it a zillion times, with-and-without a bike, and to me it does seem a bit too confined a space for peds and cyclists to share comfortably, to be honest. Can definitely see the case against.

But Cllr Woods really does talk crap. 'Cyclists are their own worst enemy'...really? How many cyclists are killed by cyclists every year?

Pages

Latest Comments