Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cycling UK calls on Welsh Government to increase access to rights of way network

Charity celebrating 50 years of cyclists being allowed to ride on bridleways

Fifty years ago, cyclists in England and Wales were granted access to just over 20 per cent of all rights of way by the Countryside Act 1968. To mark the occasion, Cycling UK is asking the Welsh government to improve on this percentage by following through on its own proposals to increase access.

Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns said: “Improving public access, particularly in the creation or restoration of connected routes is a public good. Farmers, visitors and local communities in Wales will all benefit – but let’s not wait another fifty years for this to happen.”

Last year Cycling UK and OpenMTB backed Welsh Government proposals to open up most footpaths in Wales to cycling and horse riding, calling on the public to show their support via the Trails for Wales campaign.

However, in June the Welsh Government changed tack, saying it was, “not the right time for substantive reform.” It cited “strong but differing views,” by way of explanation.

The move came despite huge public support for the proposals, with 16,468 out of a total of 17,391 responses to a September 2017 consultation supporting change to access laws.

“There’s a huge sway of public support for change to rights of way in Wales, and it’s a missed opportunity if they continue to sit on the fence on this important issue,” said Dollimore.

The UK’s rights of way network frequently changes between footpaths and bridleways, with often no noticeable change in quality between the two apart from a different signpost.

This has created confusion among the nation’s cyclists with Cycling UK’s Rides of Way report revealing that 74 per cent of people cycling on the network find it “unsuitable”.

Cycling UK has written to Minister for the Environment, Hannah Blythyn AM, seeking an explanation for the government’s position, and also seeking a meeting to discuss next steps and how to improve countryside access pending future changes to the law.

Dollimore said: “As Wales and the rest of the UK celebrates the fantastic achievements of Geraint Thomas in the Tour de France, now’s the opportunity for the Welsh Government to build on his legacy and do more for the everyday cyclist.

“The Government sought the public’s opinion for their own proposals on how they could improve conditions for cycling off-road. A minority disagreed with an overwhelming majority, and now progress on public rights of way has been kicked into the long grass.”

In the UK, only the Scottish Government has passed laws to improve access, via the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003.

This law allows people the right to access and cross land for recreational and educational purposes, unless expressly forbidden to do so. Local tourism has boomed, with cycle tourism estimated to generate between £236 and £358 million for the Scottish economy each year.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
JonSP replied to spen | 5 years ago
1 like

spen wrote:

There are far too many cyclists out there who show little or no consideration for other path users on the bridle and cycle network as it is without allowing access to the numerous much narrower footpath network

 

It's a common misconception that footpaths are narrow and bridleways are wide, but the criteria by which these RoWs were established had nothing whatsoever to do with width or what kind of trail exists on the ground. Many bridleways are narrow or barely traceable; many footpaths are wide and clear.
Widening access for bikes would ease pressure on unsuitable routes and allow cyclists to make better choices. There's every reason to think it will make things better for walkers, not worse.
Incidentally, though I ride in the Lakes far more than Wales, the overwhelming majority of walkers I meet are friendly and encouraging. I have had far more experiences of walkers holding gates open for us (even breaking into a run to do so!) than of any kind of conflict.
In many years mountain biking I recall only three experiences of walkers taking me to task for riding where I shouldn't. One was in Scotland (someone obviously hadn't studied the Scottish Access Code) and two in England. In both cases the person was insistent that I was riding on a  footpath. In both cases I was on a bridleway.

Avatar
La Brat replied to spen | 5 years ago
0 likes

spen wrote:

There are far too many cyclists out there who show little or no consideration for other path users on the bridle and cycle network as it is without allowing access to the numerous much narrower footpath network.  Add to this the inevitable vandalism, last year my local council had to spend over £4000 replacing gates, stiles and steps ripped out by mountain bikers.  Most footpaths could only be used by little old ladies travelling at 5 mph, it would be utterly irresponsible to allow cyclists onto footpaths

 

Really Spen? There’s a Public Footpath by my house that’s 5 metres wide and tarmaced for its entire length, would it still be irresponsible to allow cyclists onto that path? I’m just a bit confused because on a day to day basis the postman drives along it, the milk lorry, the tractors, the hay wagon and the livestock trucks, and, perhaps remarkably, nobody died in the process... I’m confused as to how introducing bicycles might suddenly lead to disaster

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes

Thanks Cycling UK for working so hard for ordinary cyclists, not just the sporting kind.  Access to more off road routes is going to increase the number of cyclists who feel safe, and might then be persuaded to try utility cycling, and it will create pressure for more useful segregated routes.  Wales has an Active Travel Act, and there is massive public support, but yet again, the landowners dominate over public interest.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
2 likes

I'll say it again, sort england out before telling the mighty Wales what to do! Too many visitors destroying the place already.

 

#buildawall or a dyke.

And yes, Geraint is Welsh, isn't he.

Avatar
Simon E replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
6 likes

don simon wrote:

I'll say it again, sort england out before telling the mighty Wales what to do! Too many visitors destroying the place already.

Wales needs tourism money more than most but this is about access for everyone - locals as well as visitors. CUK represents cyclists in Wales too, these are Welsh government proposals, and they claim there is "huge public support" for change to the RoW rules.

don simon wrote:

it would be useful if you put up your nationality before posting on this thread.

No-one should have to declare their nationality in order to participate a discussion. It's disappointing to find this small-minded perspective continues and the idea that if someone is not "one of us" (whatever constitutes "us") they can't have an opinion. Geraint is as Welsh as you but I'd bet real money that he doesn't share your attitude to the English. Alfie doesn't. Most Welsh people don't and it saddens me that this inward-looking idea still persists.

If Brexit goes ahead without a decent deal there is a real possibility that many upland farms could go bankrupt. That could trigger a land grab by big money (English / Saudi / Emirates / Chinese money?) and the inevitable loss of access to large tracts of the countryside. It would also adversely affect many rural economies, which are already struggling.

And I don't think it's a case of needing to change the rules one country before the other - I reckon being able to say "Scotland has done it. Wales has done it. It's your turn England" could be a great lever for change on the other side of the dyke.

antigee wrote:

should also be asking major landowners to just simply allow access by cyclists

Ha ha, dream on! It's major landowners and the "Gerroff moi land" mindset that are the main obstacle to any access and any change in the law. FC, utilities and so on are effectively privatised already, our national assets have been sold into private ownership/control at knockdown prices since the 1980s.

Avatar
bobuffs replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
0 likes

I'll say it again, sort england out before telling the mighty Wales what to do! Too many visitors destroying the place already.

 

Totally agree.  As a cyclist, MB'er, walker, dog walker, and driver, the lack of respect for other road, track and single track users shown by many cyclist who think they have divine rights is a indictement on the cycling community.  It is time cyclists understood that they share with others who have every right to use these resources, and that they are not the sole domain of cyclist.

Until this happens access should remain unchanged.

Pages

Latest Comments