Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Scottish broadcaster asks why cyclists aren’t using A9 cycle path

Turns out she genuinely wanted to know - she guessed it wasn’t in good nick

When a motorist encounters cyclists and then asks what’s wrong with the bike path, it isn’t always rhetoric. Scottish broadcaster Lesley Riddoch actually wanted to know. And when she found out, she tried to do something about it.

On Monday, Riddoch tweeted:

She then followed up by saying:

The 273-mile A9 runs from Falkirk in central Scotland to Thurso in the far north. Riddoch described it as, “a dodgy road without anything extra to avoid.”

There is a cycle path alongside it for much of its length, but the quality of that path is predictably variable. Many cyclists replied to Riddoch to say as much.

John G Burns linked to something he’d written about the route in September 2012.

“Bear in mind that this is meant to be a road bike path, not a mountain bike trail,” he said. “The aim is to keep long distance cyclists doing runs such as Land's End to John O'Groats off the A9. These cyclists will be aiming to average at least 20mph and are often on heavily laden bikes that don't stop quickly in the wet.”

Burns encountered a huge amount of grit on the path, broken asphalt, potholes and unnecessarily steep gradients.

Other cyclists agreed that parts of the route were not well maintained, so Riddoch found out who was responsible for upkeep.

The stretch in question is managed by BEAR Scotland. Riddoch has asked them whether it is fit for purpose and is awaiting a response.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

23 comments

Avatar
antigee | 4 years ago
0 likes

Lets hope this formidable person manages to get some action - if the road is about to have new dual sections best time to provide an alternative user friendly safe cycle path these types of roads desperately need proper provision and the cost will be a fraction of the main carriageway

As to "THEY nearly caused an accident" - plain lazy and bigotted (not patronising enough?) 

When I sit eating my breakfast listening to the morning traffic news I'm amazed at the "multi vehicle" "major incident" "pileups" and "fatal headon collisions" all caused by cyclists appearing "out of nowhere"!

Lets put this straight the problem is dangerous, inconsiderate, unthinking driving.  

The assumption that cyclists have no place on busy roads and that driving too close to the vehicles in front and being unable to see or be able to react safely to slower road users needs to be challenged. It is a dangerous rationalisation of behaviour to blame THEM for being in the wrong place.

The stats show that in the main drivers are the guilty party in collisions involving cyclists and I could even point to one study that shows that in the majority of potential conflicts it is the cyclist that takes evasive action not the driver.

Avatar
Dave_B | 4 years ago
1 like

Rode most of the length of the A9 cycle path heading south two weeks ago as part of a 10 day JOGLE. The surface is a little broken up in parts but it's a really great option compared with the main A9. The road is crazy busy and traffic speeds are high, despite the extensive 50mph average zones - I wouldn't have fancied cycling it. We were a group of four, riding road/CX bikes with 28-32mm tyres, and no one punctured on the A9 cycle path.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
3 likes

They are the same ones who have no lights and yet whose lights are too bright.

Both seperate from the totally invisible ninja cyclists that drivers seem to be able to see and count so easily.

Avatar
rjfrussell | 4 years ago
4 likes

who are these minority who cycle in the middle of the road AND charge at pedestrians on pavements?

Avatar
Allezbike | 4 years ago
0 likes

In the face of the inability of the designated authorities responsible for the upkeep of the A9 cycle path to maintain and repair to a suitable standard (applicable to motor vehicles on the rest of the carriageway) possibly what is required is a crowdfunding campaign to raise the funds to send a cycle path sized road sweeping machine along the length of the route. The upshot of this might shame the scottish government and the local and regional authorities into action and highlight the barriers and hazards faced by our community .  A video of the exercise would be handy as the desk jockeys responsible for the shocking route can view it without shifting their lazy A***S into action and provide evidence of the neglect

Avatar
Tommytrucker | 4 years ago
0 likes

Ah, I stand corrected, very rarely go up to Scotland, and never driven the A9, I do agree that increased limits for hgvs have reduced the number of cars who overtake when it's not safe.

Avatar
Tommytrucker | 4 years ago
1 like

Just to be clear, speed limit on a single carriageway is still 40 mph for an hgv in Scotland, 50 on a dual, doesn't stop me from being tailgated and overtaken by hgvs at dangerous sections though...

Avatar
dodger421 replied to Tommytrucker | 4 years ago
4 likes
Tommytrucker wrote:

Just to be clear, speed limit on a single carriageway is still 40 mph for an hgv in Scotland, 50 on a dual, doesn't stop me from being tailgated and overtaken by hgvs at dangerous sections though...

Except on the A9 between Perth and Inverness where there’s been a 50mph HGV limit in place since 28th October 2014, which is also when the average speed cameras went live on this stretch.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-29708280

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to dodger421 | 4 years ago
2 likes
dodger421 wrote:
Tommytrucker wrote:

Just to be clear, speed limit on a single carriageway is still 40 mph for an hgv in Scotland, 50 on a dual, doesn't stop me from being tailgated and overtaken by hgvs at dangerous sections though...

Except on the A9 between Perth and Inverness where there’s been a 50mph HGV limit in place since 28th October 2014, which is also when the average speed cameras went live on this stretch.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-29708280

You beat me to it, but yes. The increased speed limit for HGVs on the A9 was one of a package of measures (along with the average speed cameras) intended to reduce the alarmingly high number of head-on crashes occurring along the route.

And these measures appear to have worked, given that the fatal crash rate on the A9 has been reduced substantially.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... | 4 years ago
9 likes

'... artics suddenly see them and brake'.

The sentient motor vehicle again. 

Nothing to do with the prick in his cab, checking Facebook on his iPhone.  No, no.  Perish the thought. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 4 years ago
6 likes
Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

'... artics suddenly see them and brake'.

The sentient motor vehicle again. 

Nothing to do with the prick in his cab, checking Facebook on his iPhone.  No, no.  Perish the thought. 

I had wondered about that myself: how fast were the HGVs being driven, and how far ahead was the driver actually looking, that they had to apply the brakes so very suddenly as to nearly cause a collision?

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
0 likes

Not knocking her, just asking.

First hand information and personal experience is always good.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
6 likes

"As keen cyclist I did consider b4 tweeting. But honestly they nearly caused serious accident."

Clearly you didn't consider matters enough darling, nor are you obviously a keen cyclist or are you really just an ignorant motorist who uses a cycle sometimes?

For one thing, who the fuck is 'they', and blaming other human beings going about their lawful business not doing anything wrong for 'nearly causing an accident' (sic) when in fact a serious incident almost occured because a motorist was acting in a dangerous/criminal manner and only just managed avoided killing/maiming innocent victims.

This is typical ignorant motorist bullshit speak!

 

Griff500, she hasn't recognised the problem at all, even if the path was suitable, the people on bikes are still doing nothing wrong. She doesn't even for one split second grasp that she's apportioning the blame for nearly causing an "accident" onto those who would have been the innocent victims of a crime if the criminal hadn't have driven so dangerously in the first instance i.e. an HGV driver only just seeing them last split second and juddering to a halt ergo, dangerous driving.

She might as well have said,

"Just passed a dozen gay muslims heading toward town on xx street. So dangerous as homophobic racists will suddenly see them & only just stop themelves in time before beating them to death. What's wrong with forcing 'them'  to walk down the back alley's so that they avoid getting in the way of hompophobic racists?

"As a casual lesbian muslim myself, honestly 'they' nearly caused themselves to be beaten to within an inch of their lives if not worse!"

Or 'they (referring to all women) should have stayed indoors/not walked down the street as it nearly caused them to be raped, the potential rapist had only a split second judgement to make not to rape her. Honestly, they (women) almost caused themselves to be raped because they decided to walk on the same street as a man.

 

It's the same old tired victim blaming bullshit, again and again and again, she wouldn't say any of those examples I've given but it's precisely the same!

Avatar
Griff500 replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
3 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

Griff500, she hasn't recognised the problem at all, even if the path was suitable, the people on bikes are still doing nothing wrong......

Not what I meant at all. How often do people on this board say quite rightly " the problem is not helmets, the problem  is not high vis, the problem is infrastructure". I'm not one of those who think we should all be forced to use cycle paths, and rarely use them myself, nevertheless, here we have a case where a number of cyclists who know the road well, as I do, say they wouldn't cycle on it, which is why infrastructure was put in place in the first place. If she can get the cycle path sorted, then good on her!

Avatar
bigbiker101 replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
3 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

"As keen cyclist I did consider b4 tweeting. But honestly they nearly caused serious accident."

Clearly you didn't consider matters enough darling, nor are you obviously a keen cyclist or are you really just an ignorant motorist who uses a cycle sometimes?

For one thing, who the fuck is 'they', and blaming other human beings going about their lawful business not doing anything wrong for 'nearly causing an accident' (sic) when in fact a serious incident almost occured because a motorist was acting in a dangerous/criminal manner and only just managed avoided killing/maiming innocent victims.

This is typical ignorant motorist bullshit speak!

 

Griff500, she hasn't recognised the problem at all, even if the path was suitable, the people on bikes are still doing nothing wrong. She doesn't even for one split second grasp that she's apportioning the blame for nearly causing an "accident" onto those who would have been the innocent victims of a crime if the criminal hadn't have driven so dangerously in the first instance i.e. an HGV driver only just seeing them last split second and juddering to a halt ergo, dangerous driving.

She might as well have said,

"Just passed a dozen gay muslims heading toward town on xx street. So dangerous as homophobic racists will suddenly see them & only just stop themelves in time before beating them to death. What's wrong with forcing 'them'  to walk down the back alley's so that they avoid getting in the way of hompophobic racists?

"As a casual lesbian muslim myself, honestly 'they' nearly caused themselves to be beaten to within an inch of their lives if not worse!"

Or 'they (referring to all women) should have stayed indoors/not walked down the street as it nearly caused them to be raped, the potential rapist had only a split second judgement to make not to rape her. Honestly, they (women) almost caused themselves to be raped because they decided to walk on the same street as a man.

 

It's the same old tired victim blaming bullshit, again and again and again, she wouldn't say any of those examples I've given but it's precisely the same!

I do agree... "But honestly they nearly caused serious accident" is an utterly stupid thing to say, but then resorting to calling this lady "darling" is rather condescending, sexist and appalling, it simply wasn’t needed, a comment such as a cyclist riding correctly and abiding to the law doesn’t cause an accident, it is the other careless road users that fail to see and react to the situation that are at fault… and as for the rest of your rant, just as bad.

 

Avatar
JohnnyRemo replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
5 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

"As keen cyclist I did consider b4 tweeting. But honestly they nearly caused serious accident."

Clearly you didn't consider matters enough darling, nor are you obviously a keen cyclist or are you really just an ignorant motorist who uses a cycle sometimes?

Yes she is a proper cyclist and a very formidable woman who would rip you a new one for the patronising shit.

https://www.lesleyriddoch.co.uk/cycling/

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
6 likes
Quote:

Do any other types of road users rely on voluntary labor to ensure safe infrastructure?

Imagine if Highways England had to shout out for volunteers to come and help resurface the M4?? 

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
4 likes

As "a keen cyclist" why doesn't she just try and ride it and find out for herself?

Avatar
Griff500 replied to ktache | 4 years ago
18 likes
ktache wrote:

As "a keen cyclist" why doesn't she just try and ride it and find out for herself?

Don't knock her. She has recognised a problem and does seem to be fighting the cause. We need all the friends in the media we can get!

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to ktache | 4 years ago
7 likes
ktache wrote:

As "a keen cyclist" why doesn't she just try and ride it and find out for herself?

 

I don't honestly see anything heinous about asking cyclists who might have tried it recently, as opposed to having to make a special excursion herself, when, presumably she has other things to do.  It's just more efficient.

 

Likeise, I also scowled at the "_they_ almost caused an accident" bit, but that seems a minor point compared to the main issue of actually trying to get whoever is responsible for the path to do their damn job.

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 4 years ago
4 likes

The A9 used to have a lamentable record for crashes. This was addressed to a degree by the installation of average speed cameras. Actually raising the speed limit for trucks from 40mph to 50mph also reduced the number of scary overtakes that so often used to end up in head-on crashes. 

It does carry a lot of tourist traffic and the crash statistics do show that a significant proportion of those head-on crashes involve foreign drivers, perhaps unused to driving on the left or overtaking on the right and potentially at a disadvantage if they're in a left hand drive car.

It's a lot less dangerous now than it was before the speed cameras were fitted.

I've driven it many, many times and also ridden a motorbike along it. I can't say I'd really want to cycle along it as cars will be passing at up to 60mph and trucks at up to 50mph. It is a two lane road mostly. But then if the cycle lane is in such poor condition I can understand why people do. It's a real shame that inadequate cycling facilities are in place in an area that has such stunning scenery, where you'd think cycle tourism would be set as a priority. It takes you through exactly the sort of countryside you'd want to visit, whether on a bike or otherwise.

The cycling provision needs to be sorted.

Avatar
Shades | 4 years ago
1 like

I worked in Scotland 10 years ago and driving on the A9 used to scare the life out of me; anyone who cycles on it must be certifiable.  Toxic mix of trucks, mad speeding locals, tourists and campervans; you get these short sections of dual carriageway and the fun begins.  Like something out of Ben Hur.  Normally the carnage was at the end of one of these stretches.  I was told it was all controlled by average speed cameras now.

Avatar
Sniffer replied to Shades | 4 years ago
0 likes
Shades wrote:

I worked in Scotland 10 years ago and driving on the A9 used to scare the life out of me; anyone who cycles on it must be certifiable.  Toxic mix of trucks, mad speeding locals, tourists and campervans; you get these short sections of dual carriageway and the fun begins.  Like something out of Ben Hur.  Normally the carnage was at the end of one of these stretches.  I was told it was all controlled by average speed cameras now.

Yes, has the reputation for the most dangerous road in Scotland.  I recognise your comments from the main stretch of Perth to Inverness.

Average speed cameras has reduced some of the worst excesses.  Not somewhere it would be fun to cycle.

Work is underway to dual it all the way.

Latest Comments