Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Less than half of the speed cameras in England & Wales work says Which? study

All cameras in Cumbria, Sussex and West Mercia are working, but it's a different picture elsewhere...

A study by the consumer organisation Which? has claimed that fewer than half of the approximately 3,000 speed cameras currently installed on English and Welsh roads are currently operational.

Detailed analysis of responses provided by police forces following a Freedom of Information request by researchers at Which? found that only three police forces, Cumbria, Sussex and West Mercia, had 100% of their cameras in operation.

Several police forces – Dorset, Hertfordshire, Merseyside, Norfolk and Suffolk – refused to answer, while four areas – Cleveland, Durham, North Yorkshire and Wiltshire – do not currently have fixed speed cameras at all.

The study is published just a month after road safety minister Mike Penning revealed that local road safety partnerships were to be required to make available detailed data regarding the cameras they operate.

A spokesperson for Which? told the Daily Mail: “People probably know that some fixed speed cameras don’t contain film.

“But it may come as a surprise to discover than less than 47 per cent of the fixed speed traps in England and Wales are operational at any one time.

“The figures show that your chances of being caught speeding vary greatly, depending on where you’re driving.”

Shortly after last year’s general election, the new coalition government said that it was ending the so-called ‘War on the Motorist’ and would not provide funding for new cameras, at the same time as slashing 40% from the Road Safety Grant.

Since then, a number of local authorities have decided to switch off a number of cameras they operate or reduce the number of cameras working as they attempt to balance their budgets, including in Oxfordshire where Thames Valley Police is reportedly considering assuming responsibility for the devices.

That in turn has given rise to a heated debate between road safety campaigners on the one hand, who say that the cameras are an essential tool in reducing the level of deaths and injury on Britain’s roads, and opponents of them, who claim that the devices are little more than a means of raising money from motorists, and on whom the point seems lost that if drivers were adhering to the legal speed limit in the first place, they would have little to be worried about.

Katie Shepherd of the road safety charity Brake told the Daily Mail that speed cameras “help to stem the huge cost to the economy of road death and injury.”

However, it appears that most respondents to a survey by Which? did not agree, with only 47% saying that they believed the cameras made the roads safer, while 83% believed that cameras only caused drivers to slow down at specific locations instead of bringing about a change in their general driving behaviour.

In the Which? report, only 12% of the 117 cameras installed in Derbyshire were found to be operational, a similar proportion as was discovered in Gloucestershire, which has just 26 cameras, and neighbouring Thames Valley, which has 238.

The lowest rates of operational cameras were found in the two of the three areas that outside London have the highest number of speed cameras – just 10% of Lancashire’s 287 cameras are working, and 11% of the 263 installed in Staffordshire. In the West Midlands, which at 304 has more cameras than anywhere else apart from the capital, 17% were working.

Just over half – 56% - of the 468 speed cameras in the Metropolitan Police area were working, and in the capital, there are also four cameras in the Square Mile, policed by the City of London force, two of which are currently out of commission.

Details of all police areas appear in a graphic accompanying the Daily Mail report on the Which? report, the newspaper giving the list the title ‘The Speed Trap Postcode Lottery’ just in case anyone was unsure on the newspaper’s line on speed cameras.


Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


Simon_MacMichael | 13 years ago

Thanks Jova54  1

jova54 | 13 years ago

While you're in edit mode Simon, perhAps you'd like to correct the reference to speed cameras being installed on the English and the Welsh in the first paragraph.  26

Oh, and the 'published' in the fourth.  4

In bed sick at the moment so little else to do while the wife is at work!!  3

Simon_MacMichael | 13 years ago

Cheers JC, fixed that now. Headed as in the head cold I am currently suffering from as a result of failing to keep myself properly heated...

JC | 13 years ago

JC? study finds increased spelling mistakes on website
“Headed debate” ?  39
That’s the second one I’ve seen on Road CC today
“Ride 1 only rant to 1000 copies”  26

Latest Comments