- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Kensington Palace Gardens (licensed CC BY SA 2.0 by LondonEnte on Flickr).jpgBritain’s “most expensive street” bans cyclists and pedestrians – after complaints about “dangerous” cyclists causing “near misses” and putting residents and diplomats “at risk”
Concerns about “speeding” cyclists using an exclusive London street as a cut-through, allegedly leading to several complaints of “near misses” with residents and diplomats, have led to the road being temporarily closed to both people on bikes and pedestrians while a safety review is held.
Kensington Palace Gardens, a half-mile-long tree-lined avenue dubbed Britian’s most expensive street and ‘Billionaires Row’ thanks to its £35 million average house price, connects Notting Hill Gate and Kensington High Street in the west of the capital, and is home to several foreign embassies, such as Russia and Israel, France’s ambassadorial residence, and notable private residents such as former Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich and Princess Haya of Jordan.
The street has long been closed to motorists, with pedestrians and cyclists until this week able to enter at any time through gates guarded by sentry boxes at either end of the avenue.
However, the Evening Standard has reported that people walking or cycling along Kensington Palace Gardens have been temporarily banned, after complaints were raised about cyclists using the street as a cut-through endangering pedestrians.
On Wednesday the Crown Estate, which owns and manages the avenue, closed the road to pedestrians and cyclists “due to safety concerns”, with members of the public now unable to use it until a review is completed.
“We have taken the decision to temporarily close Kensington Palace Gardens to pedestrians and cyclists due to safety concerns,” a Crown Estate spokesperson said this week.
“This decision has been made to prioritise safety and wellbeing, whilst we review a long-term solution.”
Sources have told the Evening Standard that there have been numerous complaints about the behaviour of cyclists on the street, which have allegedly put residents, diplomats, and visitors “at risk” and led to several near misses. The sources say that officials are currently exploring ways to make the road safer.
The Standard has also reported that the ban on pedestrians as well as cyclists comes after fears were raised that security guards would be forced to deal with “disgruntled” cyclists who would instead wish to walk their bike down the street, or lead to those riding hire bikes to leave them outside the gate on the public path.
When asked why pedestrians were also subject to the temporary closure, the Crown Estate insisted that the road would be closed until the safety review is completed and a final decision is made on public access.
Rather notably, this isn’t the first time that residents of Britain’s most exclusive, well-heeled street have raised objections about cyclists encroaching on their turf.
> Locals block Quietway on exclusive London private road
Back in 2016, plans to make Kensington Palace Gardens one of London’s cycling Quietways – signposted routes on quiet back streets designed to offer a calmer and safer network for people on bikes – were scrapped after residents complained that the use of the road by “the masses” would compromise security and “cede its exclusivity”.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea council and Transport for London (TfL) received 15 responses to the consultation on the proposed Quietway, including “several” respondents who claimed that it would “pose security risks, unspecified”.
One resident told the consultation: “The residents on this private road should not be responsible for the use of the masses. Open use of this private roadway by the masses will cede its exclusivity and surrender its security.”
“Those who already use the cut-through... are oblivious to the dismount notices and feel the right to pedal through, causing pedestrians to move and young mums with buggies to move out of the way,” another added.
“This is annoying to all, residents and visitors alike, we pay for the upkeep of this private road… in our high council tax and expect to keep the standards of privacy this brings us.”
In a premonition of what was to come eight years later, one letter writer argued that cyclists should be prevented from using the road entirely, while another wrote that there were “far too many cyclists on the roadway as it is” while calling for “a blanket ban”.
After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.
Latest Comments
- Keykey1985 35 min 10 sec ago
He wasn't brake-checking me, he was trying to get me to stop. Nothing good would have come from me stopping.
- PRSboy 52 min 43 sec ago
It was designed around 28mm tyres but there's lots of clearance and could certainly take bigger tyres.
- Cugel 55 min 35 sec ago
A dinosaur version is shurely for the kiddies. Myself I'd like The Hindenburg. There may be The Freisian, filled with methane rather than hydrogen,...
- Rendel Harris 57 min 3 sec ago
No evidence on the video of any interaction between themselves and the cyclist so possibly they simply didn't get the reg number?
- Rendel Harris 1 hour 9 min ago
When I see SLOW HORSES I always think ah, so this is where the ones I bet on are kept...
- ktache 1 hour 45 min ago
The proximity to the Transport Research Labs at Crowthorne means that the area often gets weird new stuff.
- chrisonabike 1 hour 51 min ago
No great mystery in either case, surely? Both US politician and the motor trade say "choose us and your life will be better and easier!" And other...
- stonojnr 4 hours 3 min ago
theres an attitude I encounter alot locally, and demonstrated in bucket loads by drivers on my commute home tonight, that cyclists shouldnt be on...
- Keesvant 5 hours 22 min ago
If the chains snap that is lack of build quality or material.....
- Hirsute 6 hours 18 min ago
"Wisdom is better than weapons of war, but one sinner destroys much good."
Add new comment
43 comments
Unsurprising shittake in the headline from the appalling Evening Standard, which is of course owned by a Russian oligarch who is doubtless chums with many of the billionaires who have their mansions on the street: "Speeding cyclists force closure of ‘Billionaires’ Row’ close to Kensington Palace to public". Note that it is cyclists who have forced the closure, not our fault squire, we'd love to keep our exclusive security-patrolled rich man's playground open to all but the cyclists have forced us to shut you all out.
As others have said if they actually cared about pedestrian safety they'd not also ban pedestrians too. They just don't want proles on their street.
It's time to get these billionaires out of London.
".........after complaints were raised about
cyclistsplebs using the street as a cut-through endangeringpedestriansrich people."FTFY.
Looks like one very exoensive car park which detracts from the area. Surely, they should also ban parking on the street!!!
Weird one.
I can't find anything except half a dozen Slight injuries in 25 years.
Someone is a bullshit-artist.
The very nature of the road, only 800m long with cobbled sections and gates at both ends with the whole road in full view of armed police both at each end and outside the various embassies, would mean you'd have to be an absolute lemon to try any "dangerous and furious" riding down there, and I've never seen any. For some people the presence of a moving cyclist anywhere within fifty metres appears to go down in their book as a "near miss".
.
It's a private road, hard to argue against the request to band people, unless they are in cars and reside on that street.
It may be a private road but as far as I understand it is a public right of way (if it wasn't I'm sure they would have banned the proles long ago); I'm not sure whether the owner of a private road has a right to ban cycling but I'd think that in banning all members of the public, even pedestrians, from a public right of way Crown Estates are on pretty dubious legal ground. Far from being "hard to argue against the request" I'd say that if this were taken to court Crown Estates would find it hard to justify their actions.
"the masses"...
They don't even bother to hide their contempt. The enduring human tendency to mistake wealth for worth is just staggering. I'd like to airdrop in a pubfull of Mansfield lads to instantly start screaming, "Are you looking at my pint?" and "D'you think you're better than me?"
One rule for me and another rule for thee.
Sadly we have two private roads near us 1 has access and 1 doesn't. They pay for all the road maintenance and if its private thats it im afraid.
Their are gated communities in this country no difference
Lots of private land, including private roads, has public rights-of-way that can't be removed arbitrarily, owners can't just say "closed, that's it" as they wish.
Whenever there's nearly a crash don't forget to call the nearly police.
Diplomats being renowned for their exemplary motoring behaviour.
If it's a private road, why would council tax payers be paying anything towards its upkeep ?
That ^^
If its also an unadopted road there'd be nothing to stop the local authority blocking off the junctions at both ends to motor vehicles within their highway boundary provided they gop through the correct TRO process. Right of access doesn't mean by motorised vehicle.
If your taxes are going towards its upkeep then you have the right to use it no matter what these elites say and there is nothing they can do about it.
Not sure about that, my taxes go towards the upkeep of Buckingham Palace but I'm fairly sure if I tried to have a stroll through the state apartments there would be some objection.
Also, plenty of military sites wouldn't be enthused about the public wandering around to see where their tax money is being spent.
I'm not aware of any legal basis for that.
Can you cite, please?
Here the 2 private roads pay for their own maintenance, You make a valid points!
Reeks of 'scam'.
If they can safer by closing the street to bikers why can't we all be safer and close all roads to cyclists especially the 2 separate parents i've seen this week riding down a busy road with small kids sitting on the crossbar , and the very clever man who decided it would be ok to ride down the wrong side of a main road alongside of his child on a small bike . I often wonder is it compulsory when you buy a bike to have all your commonsense removed
Ah, they got that from road.cc! There was a post here complaining about yoof riding carelessly but being invulnerable. Someone responded suggesting they would attach an urchin to their handlebars to protect themselves.
Didn't happen.
In the Netherlands I once saw three cyclists riding side by side carrying a sofa, which was balanced across their rear luggage racks. It's also not uncommon there for people to carry two or three small children with them on a bike. It's absolutely disgusting. They're savages with no respect for human life. So glad we got our country back.
I need some help. Do you know which band recorded these songs?
A. Poison Arrow
B. The Look of Love
C. When Smokey Sings
It's on the tip of my tongue - for the life of me I just can't remember.
Being the RCC troll, is it a requirement to never check your facts or just make it up as you go along? I'm asking because I saw nearly 1 million drivers last week driving without insurance/VED/MoT and KSI'ing hundreds of people, especially pedestrians while on the pavement. If only we could ban everyone who drives with such disregard for other people using the public highway, it would save many £millions a year.
I haven't bothered to fact check this either. But cyclists....Lycra...tax....helmets...
Looks like a very wide road should be no issue with cyclists using it as a low traffic cut through, I supect the issues are
1) because it is effectively gated some oh so important people don't check properly before exiting their drives.
2) because it is low traffic pedestrians are choosing to wander down the wide road and not use the pavements. They are they shocked when cyclists pass them (which may or may not be dangerous)
Pages