Here on the live blog, we’re well used to reading articles in the national press – usually penned by lethargic, uninspired journos frantically scrabbling around, hours before their deadline, for something that will generate a few clicks and keep the editor happy – deriding cyclists, for whatever reason sprung to their tired minds first.
While there have been far too many of these paint-by-numbers ‘Cyclists are horrible’ diatribes to keep count of over the years (Jake Wallis Simons must account for at least 100 of them by now), one still manages to stick out in the mind.
Back in 2015, Metro writer Yvette Caster wrote one of the more inflammatory of the hundreds of anti-cycling articles that have littered our screens, as she cobbled together a well-worn list of cliches and bingo comments under the headline ‘Cyclists are a menace and should be banned from the roads’.
Her rather insipid piece (despite its hell for leather headline) relied on tropes based on MAMILs, Lycra, red lights, and ‘speed demons’, while claiming people on bikes are “holding up traffic, causing accidents and generally being a total liability on the modern highway”, and even inspired a satirical response on road.cc.
> Bart Chan demolishes Metro columnist's anti-cycling rant
Well, fast forward eight years, and it seems Caster – like Hank Williams before her – has seen the light.
Writing in the Guardian yesterday, she described the “caustic” backlash to her Metro article, during which “furious hordes accused me of stirring up hate, of encouraging reckless, criminal motorists and of indirectly putting cyclists in danger”.
“Cyclists who had been knocked off their bikes and people whose cycling relatives had been injured got in touch,” she wrote. “I was horrified but also convinced that most motorists were careful, sensible and well-meaning, so the accidents must have been tragic, rare, isolated incidents.
“Looking back now, I understand their rage better. I thought I’d thrown a stick on a campfire, but I’d poured petrol on an inferno. According to the Department for Transport, about 100 cyclists die on British roads every year. In 2022, 4,056 were seriously injured and 11,546 slightly injured.”
Those tight deadlines make it difficult to Google, I’ll give her that – but at least she’s found the DfT’s website now.
She continued:
When I wrote the piece, nowhere I had ever lived, which included cities across the country, seemed suited to cycling, and I, like my friends, viewed cyclists as eccentrics. I grew up in a remote country village with two buses a day: one into town, one out.
There were no pavements or bike lanes and no safe way to walk or cycle the eight miles to town – and there still isn’t. I could not understand why anyone would take the risk of cycling down windy country roads when 4x4s existed, or pedal through London, a place where everyone seemed to hate cyclists.
But my attitude changed during lockdown. There was no lightbulb moment – but suddenly the noise of the roads was gone. Cars were no longer important because we weren’t allowed to travel. In their absence, instead of traffic outside my window I heard birdsong. A strange kind of peace descended. Nature grew louder.
Caster claims her lockdown revelation inspired her, after it broke down, to give up her car and embrace public transport.
“I went from disliking cyclists to wishing there were more on the roads,” she added. “Looking at the article now, I know it was written by a thoughtless younger version of myself, putting clicks before people. I’ve come to appreciate those taking journeys that save us from pollution.
“I wish my town, and Britain, could repay cyclists’ and pedestrians’ efforts with an infrastructure to help them go everywhere, safely.
“Some friends still see cyclists as a nuisance. Others see me as odd for staying car-free… I’m even planning to try cycling. Just don’t ask me to wear Lycra.”
> We don’t need vigilante cyclists like Cycling Mikey – because “cyclists already own the roads”, says Spectator article
So is Yvette’s (somewhat) conversion enough to atone for her sins from 2015?
“I’m cynical,” says road.cc reader peted76 in the forum. “But I’ll take it and more turncoats just like her also please. A drop of goodwill towards cyclists in an ocean of hate.”
“I choose to believe the writer has in fact changed their outlook and is not simply jumping on another way of generating ‘clicks’,” added HoldingOn.
Maybe the road to Damascus was actually a cycle lane all along…
Add new comment
37 comments
Heh. We love Derby.
https://twitter.com/tandemkate/status/1729227851973689662
Shouty pedestrian needs to be roasted by the police for her offensive language and public order offences, including threatening behaviour. What a total moron and a danger to others. Imagine if you were sharing that space with children and had to endure her ranty BS. A truly appalling person on display.
But surely shouty woman is just following the tone set by the government? Calling out cyclists and their "woke" ways, constantly attacking proper, british, law abiding folks?
I worry she and lots like her all have a vote...
I think enough police have been in trouble for that sort of thing without you encouraging them.
On the other hand, I have had a driver aim his car at me and berate me for being on the road instead of using a shared path.
reason #241 why shared use paths are a waste of space
Just to add another way in which she is completely wrong, he already is on the road, just as she is.
Pages