(Before we start, how about that for a cycling headline holy – or unholy – trinity…)
Over the last few weeks, we’ve been treated to some typically sensible opinions on cycling from Captain Sensible himself, former Top Gear presenter – and cyclist – James May.
In a recent interview with the London Cycling Campaign, May branded councils who refuse to install cycling infrastructure “t***s”, criticised the Telegraph’s anti-cycling agenda, and said driving in London is a “totally pointless activity”.
> James May tells councils to stop being "t***s" and build more cycle lanes
So, it was really only a matter of time before his ol’ mucker Jezza intervened, during a break from his all-encompassing farming duties, obviously, to restore the equilibrium with a classic anti-cycling jibe which used to be reserved for Sunday nights on BBC One.
And the battleground Clarkson chose to renew his depressingly familiar Top Gear antics? London’s Holland Park roundabout, a junction described by the capital’s walking and cycling commissioner Will Norman as “one of the most dangerous on the TfL road network”.
Last year, we reported that Transport for London had proposed a series of changes to the roundabout in Shepherd’s Bush, a junction where six people were seriously injured in collisions between 2020 and 2023, with 59 people, including 14 cyclists and pedestrians, injured in total during the same period.
TfL says the plans, which would connect to earlier Cycleway 34 works, involve installing new protected two-way cycleways, a new 45-metre section of bus lane, and new signal-controlled cycle crossings, with the government body’s modelling predicting that the scheme would not have a “significant” impact on motorists or bus journey times.
> Cyclists slam report by “notorious anti-cycling group” claiming proposed bike lane on “one of the most dangerous junctions” will lead to more collisions and 800% increase in congestion
And earlier this week, after seeing a new drawing of the proposals, another broadcasting Jezza, Jeremy Vine – broadcaster, road.cc Podcast guest, and someone who frequently uses the roundabout by bike – was full of praise for the plans.
“THANK GOD someone is at last taking seriously the safety of vulnerable road users,” Vine tweeted.
“Having a Grand Prix here every day is ridiculous. I’m speaking as one who uses it constantly, and it’s a huge barrier to happy commuting.”
Cue Clarkson and his usual car-brained commentary.
“I use it frequently too. And it’s fine because I have a car, not a child’s toy,” the motoring journalist replied on Tuesday night.
That reply, which has already attracted 10,000 likes on X, was greeted with the kind of euphoria not seen in England since Geoff Hurst’s hat-trick in 1966, with Clarkson fanatics rushing to describe the outrange enthusiast’s unoriginal comment as “brilliant” and “top tier”, with one even claiming “we are not worthy of this level of comedy” (come on fella, value yourself a bit higher than that).
Of course, not everyone was bent over in stiches at Clarkson’s unparalleled comedic genius (unparalleled for six-year-olds in the school playground, to be clear).
Camera cyclist Cycling Mikey – who Clarkson branded a “sneak” this time last year – hit back by telling the presenter: “You are the child.”
While Vine simply replied this morning with: “Oh God.”
Our sentiments exactly, Jeremy.
Add new comment
7 comments
Aranburu now reinstated as winner.
Clarkson. Fat moron's icon talking tocix ill-informed bollix shocker. If ever there was someone who should just be put out to grass with the rest of the Jag-drink-driving golf-club dwellers.
"We currently have safe existing cycling infrastructure on the roundabout which can be easily enhanced with better signage".
The roundabout:
As far as I can tell, the safe cycling infrastructure is shared use route on the 'pavement' which involves stopping potentially twice as much (6 crossings if you wanted to take the third exit, versus 3 red lights in a car) and takes you out of your way up and down ramps, alleys, and a considerable way up one arm of the junction to get to one of the crossings. [EDIT: motorbrain facepalm - of course you wouldn't need to go clockwise to the third exit on a bike. But the multiple crossings point stands.]
They have been gradually converting a number of these gyratories (Highbury and Old Street spring to mind) so presumably have an evidence and experience base to go off, rather than knee jerk "it'll make congestion worse" reactions.
Sign it better!
Obviously the road is far too narrow for cycling infra! I mean, once we had allocated the correct number of lanes (we have to follow the guidelines!) for safety and capacity, we unfortunately could not...
My understanding is one problem with junctions like Holland Park is the assumption that more lanes + space = higher car throughput.
Chances are that the multilane gyratory with lots of traffic from all directions is a perfect example of somewhere that needs testing to see if Braess Paradox (or similar) applies.
Extra lanes on the roundabout add complexity (lane changes + vehicles from more directions) and don't necessarily help if most traffic is still trying to use a single exit that can't cope... This can also vary depending on how congested it is (i.e. an extra lane can go from being an improvement to detrimental when it goes from free flowing to congested...)
Is that some new SUV?
Woke peds and cyclists !
https://bsky.app/profile/cllremmaedwards.bsky.social/post/3lmemrm5rmk2h
" I've just been thinking about these - Bristol has funded changing non-junction lights to green immediately for pedestrians rather than making them wait for cars 1/4 of a mile away (which is what most towns and cities do). Well done to my Bristol Green colleagues like @cllremmaedwards.bsky.social "