Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bike diversion route will send cyclists into “crowds of kids and parents” on “mud path” outside school, as councillor claims funding for new safe cycle lane has “disappeared”

The bike path’s lack of progress has sparked safety fears, after the route was proposed as a diversion for cyclists due to an upcoming roundabout closure

A proposed diversion for route for cyclists, which could be put in place from March due to works on a nearby roundabout, has been branded a “mud path” that will force people on bikes into “crowds of kids and parents” outside a school, a local councillor has claimed.

The councillor has also claimed that funding to create a new cycling and walking route in Stockport, which could have been used as part of the diversion, has “disappeared”, despite the local authority pledging to build the upgraded infrastructure five years ago.

Proposals for an improved cycling route linking Edgeley to Stockport town centre have been in the pipeline since 2019, and were unveiled in 2021 as part of Greater Manchester’s then-cycling and walking commissioner Chris Boardman’s plans to create a region-wide active travel network.

However, three years later, a section of the route in front of Our Lady’s Catholic Primary School in Edgeley has not yet started.

That lack of progress has now sparked safety fears, after the route – which sits between the school and a block of flats – was proposed as a possible diversion for cyclists, to be put in place when Stockport’s Armoury roundabout closes for 12 months in March while work is underway to replace Greek Street bridge.

Armoury roundabout, Stockport (Network Rail)

Armoury roundabout and Greek Street bridge, Stockport (Network Rail)

The existing structure at Greek Street, which runs over the West Coast mainline and is made of about 200 concrete beams, will be demolished along with the road above it, then rebuilt, with the new bridge set to provide, Network Rail, says, “safer and more reliable” travel for train services for years to come.

However, according to local councillor Matt Wynne, the diverted cycle route set to be put in place during the works is essentially a “mud path”, and that any diversion will send an increased number of cyclists into “crowds of parents and kids” outside the school during drop off and pick up times.

> "A bike lane doesn't close a village": Dame Sarah Storey defends cycle lane blamed for "ruining business" and "killing village", calls shops closing "a coincidence, not an unexpected consequence"

Speaking to Stockport Hub, Wynne urged Stockport Council and Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) to fund the cycle route work as promised, and install the infrastructure before Greek Street bridge is removed.

“We’ve got the Armoury roundabout bridge coming out for 12 months from March, and this route that they were meant to upgrade is going to form the primary diversionary route between Edgeley and the town centre,” the councillor said.

“We were told the cycle route was going to be fully funded before the bridge came out, then we were told it would be part funded, now we’re being told that there’s no money for it.

“Edgeley residents completely understand that this bridge has got to come out, but it feels like we’re getting short changed.”

> Cycle lanes boosting house prices by up to eight per cent, new study finds

In response to Wynne’s complaints, Stockport Council said that the diversion routes are still being considered, clarifying that nothing is yet confirmed.

Nevertheless, Stockport’s transport lead, Grace Baynham, said the local authority is trying to find funding for the Edgeley cycling route before the end of the financial year.

“The council has already secured close to £1m of government-backed City Region Sustainable Transport funds to deliver an improved highway scheme on the roundabout following the completion of the Network Rail-led Greek Street bridge renewal works,” she said.

“Following this good news, we have been working closely with partners at TfGM in response to the recent council motion to quickly progress the wider active travel scheme around the Greek Street works.

“Officers are working hard to unlock further funding for the whole of the wider scheme before the end of the financial year.”

> “Nasty and unsafe” road plans that will force cyclists to use backstreets “overrun” with lorries referred to Active Travel England, as councillors slam “compromise” scheme that sees drivers “not losing out in any way”

While Baynham’s comments appear promising to cyclists eagerly anticipating the long-awaited active travel project, this isn’t the first time Stockport Council have been criticised this year for failing to find the funds to provide safe infrastructure for cyclists.

In August, plans to redevelop the busy A6 in Stockport were criticised by councillors for including what they described as “nasty and unsafe” proposals to remove the road’s painted cycle lanes and force cyclists to use backstreets “overrun” with HGVs.

One Green Party representative even called for the plans to be referred to Active Travel England for review, after fellow councillors argued that the so-called “compromise” scheme in fact means that “the losses are all for cyclists”.

However, Stockport Council, who worked with TfGM to put forward the proposals to build new bus lanes on Wellington Road North, a major road linking the town with Manchester’s boundary, claimed that constructing new protected cycle lanes on the A6 would make the cost of the £15 million scheme “colossal”, while also arguing that there is “insufficient space”.

Higher Bury Street, Stockport (Google Street View)

Along with the new bus lanes and the introduction of 20mph speed limits on some residential streets, the proposed scheme includes cycle routes on side streets to the east and west of the main road with crossing options, but will not provide any cycling infrastructure on the A6 itself.

This omission prompted one Green councillor Gary Lawson to point out that the painted cycle lanes that currently exist on Wellington Road North will also be removed as part of the project.

“I find it a very disappointing scheme,” Lawson said. “It’s referred to as a compromise scheme, but in a compromise everybody gives a little. Motorists are not losing out in any way here, buses are benefiting, the compromise is the losses are all for cyclists.

“We have a cycle lane at the moment along the A6 but that will go as I understand it, and cyclists will be sent here, there, and everywhere. Most cyclists want the most direct route and the safest route, and that would be a segregated cycle route along the A6.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

2 comments

Avatar
Pub bike | 1 week ago
8 likes

A similar issue occurs every weekday on Priory Lane that links the Roehampton Gate entrance of Richmond Park with the Upper Richmond Road: part of the A205 South Circular Road in London.

There is cycle path that runs along the length of Priory Lane on the west side that takes up roughly half of what was once the footway.  It is not a shared use path: the pavement is divided approximately medially by a thick solid white line.

Taxis wait to enter the gates to Roehampton Gate school to drop off and collect pupils every weekday morning and afternoon and park on the cycle path, frequently in a queue of more than 5 cars as they wait to enter the gates, blocking the cycle path completely and forcing cyclists into the road or the narrow area allocated for pedestrians.  

A proposal to put allocated spaces directly on the cycle lane was vigorously opposed by local cycle campaigners.

Even though the parking is illegal the authorities turn a blind eye and there is no end in sight.

It is strange as to why the cars don't just wait on the road rather than blocking the cycle path and creating havoc on the footway as straddling the pavement blocks the roadway in any case.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 week ago
5 likes

What a surprise… 

Latest Comments