- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Statue of Justice, Old Bailey (licensed CC BY 2.0 on Flickr by Ronnie Macdonald).jpgJail for hit-and-run driver who killed cyclist while racing another car
A hit-and-run driver who was racing another car when he crashed into and killed a cyclist has been sent to prison for 12 years and six months after being convicted by a jury at the Old Bailey of causing death by dangerous driving.
Cyclist Stewart Grainger was killed when Muniir Ali hit him head-on as he overtook the car he had been racing on Mitcham Road, Croydon, at around 3am on 30 May 2022, reports the London Evening Standard.
Ali, aged 31 and from Thornton Heath, who handed himself into police later on that day, claimed at his trial that a friend had been driving his BMW 118 Sport at the time.
The court was told that Ali was travelling at 40mph, in excess of the 30mph speed limit on the road where the fatal crash, which was recorded by CCTV cameras as well as Mr Grainger’s helmet camera, happened.
According to Sarah Morris, prosecuting, the footage showed that Ali’s driving was “racing or competitive.”
However, he continued to insist that a friend had been driving the car, claiming that he had consumed alcohol at an event to celebrate passing exams as part of his training to be a train driver.
Defending Ali, who pleaded guilty to failure to stop at the scene and failure to report the incident, Roy Headlam insisted that his client was “sorry and remorseful” and that he was aware that “nothing I say on his behalf will make up for the loss the family of Mr Grainger has faced.”
But sentencing him to prison and banning him from driving for seven years following his eventual release, Judge Alexia Durran said: “It was not a pure accident, it was a deliberate and flagrant piece of dangerous driving in which you killed a entirely innocent man.”
She said that Mr Grainger’s helmet camera “clearly showed you driving straight at him,” adding, “his last moments would have been those of sheer terror.”
In a victim impact statement, Mr Grainger’s wife, Tracey, said: “You chose to get into your car, you chose to drive over the speed limit, you chose to overtake and drive on the wrong side of the road and you chose not to stop.
“Your choices led to you killing my partner, my soulmate, my best friend, my future.
“Your choices led to you killing a dad, grandad, uncle, work colleague and friend.
“From that moment on you made the choice that changed my life in so many ways,” she added.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- mdavidford 4 sec ago
It is, but what Rendel meant to write is 'an increase to 430'. So increase of 294, which is 216% of 136.
- Jogle 40 min 28 sec ago
Of course there was a squirrel
- chrisonabike 45 min 33 sec ago
RE: Sydney sign - isn't it "walk your (oversized) bike backwards"?
- Cugel 47 min 41 sec ago
Strangely, I've ridden all of those roads/routes you describe (and a lot more in Noerthern England) entirely without a gizmo of any kind, other...
- ktache 1 hour 19 min ago
Effective little things. Even have them on my Good Bike, my least reflectored. Still working through packs of them I got very cheap at Tesco.
- SimoninSpalding 4 hours 5 min ago
You could say the same for foam rollers and lots of other "massage " balls etc. In my experience you know when you get it in the right spot, and as...
- David9694 15 hours 52 min ago
One Stop in Evesham ram raided on Christmas Day by thieves https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/24821392.one-stop-evesham-ram-raide...
- Spangly Shiny 19 hours 8 min ago
Bullseye!
- chrisonabike 20 hours 18 sec ago
Shurely "we have to build more housing! But developers won't build 'affordable housing'. And where can we find land anyway (lots of nimbys)?"...
- hawkinspeter 1 day 41 min ago
I've noticed previously that it can take a couple of hours for the post to show up in the forum posts section, but if it's not appearing at all,...
Add new comment
22 comments
12 years is good. Hopefully they will be an unpleasant 12 years for the driver. If only sentences like this were more prevalent - it would surely help to reduce road deaths.
Does the law allow for a permanent driving ban? If not, what is the maximum length of time a ban can be?
You can be banned permanently but normally it's half the sentence to be started when the sentence ends.
You can also be banned for a non motoring offence if the use of a vehicle is deemed relevant to the actual offence commited (and also if it wasn't)
https://www.mortons-solicitors.co.uk/can-you-be-banned-from-driving-for-...
see also https://www.jmw.co.uk/articles/motoring-law/how-to-avoid-driving-ban-exc...
Wait - what?
Has that ever happened?
Road peace say in 2018 there were 5
https://www.roadpeace.org/roadpeace-calls-for-greater-use-of-lifetime-dr...
Thanks - I should have looked there first! They've got a big campaign document from 2016 looking at this - with graphs!
Here's one that didn't make the grade - lifetime ban given to someone who was disqualified on at least 24 occasions but overturned by the court of appeal - ban of 10 years imposed because he was only 30 and might turn his life around.
Two noted here in 2023 - one for booze (sounds like an alcoholic with a long record) the other for drugs (also with previous). Presumably the records were dire as they didn't manage to kill anyone this time.
You're not safe (in Scotland) from getting a ban even if you're rich! Given the lighter punishments others have been given for far worse this even sounds unduly harsh...
OTOH here's one man who's clocked up multiple lifetime bans! (Shows how effective enforcement isn't).
Don't panic though - apparently you can apply for an earlier end to your ban if it was over 2 years and you've done a minumum period!
The driver had been drinking in celebration of having passed his exams to become a train driver. He already had committed driving offences. I hope he never gets behind the wheel of a car, or behind the controls of a locomotive, ever gain. RIP to his victim and my condolences to the family.
How does "Guilty to Failing to Stop" square with "My Mate was Driving"?
So we are seeing more approrpiate sentences for 'deliberate dangerous drivers".
How do we extend that to dozy drivers who cripple or kill people?
Well that's not a crime as they didn't set out to injure, or get drunk and drive or have a race. So not "wrong'uns" and their peers think "it's tragic but could have been anyone". Or if they think a bit further " inevitable consequence of mass motoring".
We're only slowly approaching the point where intentionally nasty and dangerous driving is being remotely punished reasonably. We are a long long way off punishing dozy driving.
Does attempting to frame someone make him guilty of an additional crime as well?
If its not framing, its colluding
"Ali, who has a previous conviction for careless driving from 2017"
So, he's sorry and remorseful even though at his trial he was trying to blame his friend. The only thing he's sorry about is getting caught. RIP and condolences to Mr Grainger's family and friends.
Nothing says I'm sorry like getting your solicitor to read a statement that they wrote for you.
As far as I can tell the only difference between this case and so many others where the judge accepts the accused is genuinely remorseful and made a 'one off' driving mistake is the not guilty plea. Or maybe this judge actually takes the death of a cyclist seriously unlike most of them?
I hope it is the latter but I suspect it is just because the accused thumbed his nose at the law and paid the price.
One other important difference is the availablity of footage from the cyclist's point of view. Perhaps this aided the judge in empathising with the cyclist and realising how vulnerable we are. One of the reasons I always ride with a camera. It won't help me but it may help my loved ones as they will know the killer will have been punished as well as them, and hopefully the deterrence effect of a suitable sentence will help other cyclists.
Agreed, probably the best of the reasons for running cameras I can think of.
Make sure your friends and family know you use a camera, and what it looks like. If the police just think it's a light, or it flies off at the scene of the crash, nobody might know to look for the footage.
My deepest sympathies and thoughts go out to the family and friends of Stewart.
Worthless specimen of humanity.