Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Taxi driver who killed cyclist avoids jail after lawyer's hi-vis and lights defence

Recently-retired Robert Mallinson had front and rear lights on his bike when he was hit and killed by Daniel O’Donnell — however, the taxi driver's lawyer said the cyclist's lack of reflective clothing and flashing lights made him hard to see...

A defence lawyer successfully kept his client, a taxi driver who hit and killed a cyclist in a midnight crash, out of jail after asking the judge to consider the cyclist's lack of reflective clothing and flashing lights.

At a sentencing hearing at Oxford Crown Court, Michael Goold argued Robert Mallinson had been "very difficult to see" when his client, Daniel O'Donnell, knocked him down at a Didcot crossroads in the early hours of 8 August 2020.

Go Green Taxis driver O'Donnell was driving from Didcot station to pick up a fare when he hit Mr Mallinson, whose bike had front and rear lights and reflectors.

At an earlier hearing, O'Donnell pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving, and was sentenced to 10 months in prison, suspended for two years.

The Oxford Mail reports the court heard how O'Donnell's Toyota Prius slowed to 14mph as it approached the junction of Lydalls Road from Haydon Road, but appeared to speed up as he hit the cyclist riding the correct way down one-way Lydalls Road.

The professional driver stayed at the scene, with witnesses saying he was "shaking like a leaf".

Mr Mallinson, a "loving, caring man" was cycling home from seeing friends when he was struck, and was taken to hospital where, despite the efforts of intensive care doctors, he died two weeks later on August 23.

28-year-old O'Donnell said he had not seen the cyclist, something Judge Pringle said he should have done, especially considering his profession.

"As a taxi driver and someone familiar with that road you should have been concentrating hard to your right, looking out not just for headlights but for any other road users," the judge said.

However Judge Pringle opted to suspend the sentence, noting that O'Donnell had no prior convictions, would "seriously struggle" in prison, had strong mitigation and could likely be rehabilitated.

Defence lawyer Goold said his client was "deeply, deeply remorseful", and argued the cyclist's lack of reflective clothing had made him difficult to spot. O'Donnell was also banned from driving for two years and will have to pass an extended retest if he wishes to drive once the ban passes.

In a victim personal statement read to the court, Mr Mallinson’s wife Janet said: "He was a wonderful, loving, caring man. [O’Donnell] has taken away the love of my life, my soulmate, the man I wanted to grow old with."

Mr Mallinson's brother, John, said the death was "needless", and the defendant had showed a "complete disregard" for his sibling’s "physical vulnerability on a bicycle".

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

66 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Jimwill | 2 years ago
2 likes
Avatar
Jimwill replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
3 likes

Well... if they're not gonna make themselves more visible..

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
4 likes

I know defence Solicitors are paid to do a job, however the road was lit AND the cyclist had lights on. Flashing lights are not a requirement by law and can be actually be more dangerous in the dark then constant on lights. It is strange that they always seem to get away with victim blaming.

It seems the Judge mentioned Personal Mitigation, anyone know what that was as it seems nothing to do with the cyclist. Normally it is medical or other reasons which mitigate the actions. If he was medically or emotionally unfit to drive, but still did, then surely that is more of a factor for enforciing a stronger sentence?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
4 likes

"Judge Ian Pringle QC said O’Donnell ‘simply never saw’ Mr Mallinson."

Didn't look in other words - the cyclist had lights, so why didn't he see him?

Did they do a reconstuction of the scene?

Avatar
the little onion replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
10 likes

Yeah, this is the bit that stinks from me - if there was footage or forensic evidence that showed, for example, that the lights were running low on battery and were not bright, and that the reflective bits were caked in mud and not really reflecting, then I might buy the whole "invisible cyclist" thing, to some extent. 

 

But otherwise, it just stinks of prejudice, and of acceptance of rubbish driving standards as 'normal'.

Avatar
nosferatu1001 replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
0 likes

It's more likely to be mitigation as regards custodial sentencing. There's a pre sentence report if custodial is considered where you can essentially put down the effects on you and others of you going to prison. 
 

similar to the EH plea for totting up in some ways. 

Pages

Latest Comments