Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Brother-in-law of former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf fined £450 for crashing into cyclist at red light while driving uninsured car

Ramsay El-Nakla was also handed six penalty points on his driving licence after leaving the cyclist with minor injuries

The brother-in-law of former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf has been fined £450 for crashing into a cyclist after failing to stop at a red light while driving an uninsured car, leaving the rider with minor injuries.

Ramsay El-Nakla, a father of three from Dundee and brother of the wife of SNP politician Yousaf – who served as Scotland’s first minister between March 2023 and May 2024 and also as the country’s transport minister between 2016 and 2018 – was dropping his children off at school when he collided with 59-year-old cyclist James Clunie from behind at a set of traffic lights on Arbroath Road.

According to the motorist, he failed to notice the cyclist filtering past as they approached the lights because he was turning down his car radio. Clunie, who was stopped at the lights at the time of the crash, was thrown onto the bonnet of El-Nakla’s car before falling to the ground, sustaining a minor back injury.

At Dundee’s Justice of the Peace Court earlier this week, 37-year-old El-Nakla admitted to driving carelessly and failing to slow when approaching a red light, failing to keep a proper lookout, and colliding with a stationary cyclist.

The motorist also admitted driving a car without insurance, though an additional charge of driving without a valid MOT certificate was dropped.

> Scottish transport minister to meet campaigners after death of Edinburgh cyclist whose bike got stuck on tram track

El-Nakla claimed in court that he had broken his mobile phone on holiday and was unaware that his insurance policy had been cancelled.

“In relation to having no insurance, he had gone to Ireland to visit family and had broken his phone, and did not receive messages about the direct debit failing,” Annika Jethwa, mitigating, told the court on Tuesday.

“He had had difficulties during the year and it was the policy of the company to cancel if there was a third payment failure. He has been driving since he was 19 and has never had insurance issues.”

Describing the crash itself, discal depute Ewan Chambers told the court: “The traffic lights were red so the complainer stopped. The accused failed to notice the complainer stopped at the junction.

“He has gone into the rear of the complainer’s pushbike, which caused the complainer to be thrown off the bike, landing on the bonnet of the car, before falling to the ground.

“The complainer sustained a small cut to a finger on his right hand and minor pain in his back. The accused remained at the scene for 20 minutes to assist and passed on his details. Police checks were carried out on the accused’s vehicle and showed it had no insurance.”

> Wife of ex-Scotland footballer scores hat-trick as cyclist films close pass, running red light and phone use... but rider left frustrated by "ludicrously lenient" punishment of £255 fine and penalty points

Defending El-Nakla, Jethwa said: “He was driving along and there was a van in front of him. He was of the view the van was going to continue driving, but it braked quite suddenly in front of him.

“The bicycle has come along the inside. He has gone to turn down his radio and hadn’t noticed the bike coming up beside him. The bicycle had stopped between where the van stopped and where he stopped.

“He didn’t brake in time and he struck the bike. Fortunately, he was driving extremely slowly at the time because he was coming up to traffic lights and the injury was of a minor nature.

“He waited and gave help in whatever way he could. He had been on a school run at the time. Because he had no insurance there is a civil claim against him which will be resolved elsewhere.”

> Cyclist slams “disgraceful” 12-month driving ban and £540 fine for drink driver who “ruined” his life

Jethwa also argued that any punishment that would mean El-Nakla would lose his driving licence would “cause hardship” to the 37-year-old, who received £1,400 a month on universal credit and disability payments, and needed a car “to help with the family”.

Earlier this year, El-Nakla pleaded not guilty to extortion and Class A drug offences, after he was accused of intimidating a man and extorting money from him using threatening behaviour, as well as being linked to the supply of cocaine and heroin in Dundee.

“He has a record, but it is not the worst. This was the combination of a few factors at the time. There would be hardship caused to the family if he was disqualified,” Jethwa told the court this week.

Fining El-Nakla a total £450 for the crash, which he was ordered to pay off through monthly instalments of £40, justice of the peace William Morrison also imposed six penalty points on his driving licence.

“It is an unfortunate incident, but it is indicative of a period of inattention, a momentary lapse, and I accept that,” he said.

“Nevertheless, there was injury – albeit minor – and the cyclist ought to have been protected.”

This isn’t the first time, of course, that the relative of a high-profile Scot has been fined and handed penalty points for an incident involving a cyclist.

In December, we reported that Cheryl McGregor, the wife of former Scotland, Rangers, and Hull City goalkeeper Allan McGregor, was caught on camera by a cyclist who was initially close passed, before spotting the driver roll through a red light and then use her mobile phone behind the wheel.

Cyclist films close pass and phone use Cyclist films close pass and phone use (credit: magnatom/YouTube)

In footage captured by the cyclist’s helmet camera, McGregor, driving a BMW with the personalised number plate ‘MCG1A’, can be seen overtaking close to the cyclist before driving through a red light at a later junction.

With the driver stopped in traffic, the cyclist waited for the lights to change and caught up with their vehicle, where he saw her using a mobile phone, the entire episode caught on camera.

However, the cyclist, David Brennan, told road.cc that it is “almost impossible to get road justice in Scotland” and accused the courts of “poor protection of vulnerable road users”, after he discovered in November that McGregor had accepted a deal which enabled her to plead guilty solely to using a mobile phone at the wheel.

She was then handed six penalty points and a £255 fine, a punishment Brennan described as “ludicrously lenient”.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
GMBasix replied to KiwiMike | 3 weeks ago
4 likes

It is not a reflection on the ex-FM, any more than Laurence Fox reflects badly on Richard Ayoade. It is a reflection on the criminal concerned that he does not see his family connection as a reason to behave better.

The family connection is newsworthy and of public interest.

William Morrison JP wrote:

It is an unfortunate incident, but it is indicative of a period of inattention, a momentary lapse, and I accept that.

A momentary lapse of reason that includes:

  • not being aware that he had failed on multiple occasions to ensure insurance payments were maintained,
  • not being aware that he was driving without insurance, despite warnings
  • in the absence of his mobile, finding something else (radio) to distract himself from the only job he had at the time (driving),
  • failing to slow when approaching a red light,
  • failing to keep a proper lookout, and
  • colliding with a stationary cyclist.

William Morrison, JP wrote:

Nevertheless, there was injury – albeit minor and I really don't know why we're bothering – and I suppose we have to go through some sort of pretence that we punish bad driving and protect vulnerable road users that leach off the back off good, solid, upright, road taxpaying motorists like myself, even when they aren't any of those things.

 

Annika Jethwa (for the defence) wrote:

He has a record, but it is not the worst. This was the combination of a few factors at the time. There would be hardship caused to the family if he was disqualified,...

any punishment that would mean El-Nakla would lose his driving licence would cause hardship to the 37-year-old, who receives £1,400 a month on universal credit and disability payments, and needed a car to help with the family.

And we can't have anything that would get in the way of him "helping with the family", can we! It's not clear whether the 6 points will do that.

Perhaps, and I don't want to rub salt into his wounds, he should have lined up all his little ducks in a straighter line (no reference to my next point intended) before he chose to drive on the public highway. Perhaps he should be more concerned with the hardship he may inflict on those around him on the road who have no say in the matter.

His record, incidentally, is subject to review in December, when charges against him will be tested...

Sky News wrote:

The brother-in-law of former first minister Humza Yousaf is to stand trial after he denied extortion and drug charges in a case linked to a man who died falling from a window.

Link

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to GMBasix | 3 weeks ago
0 likes

GMBasix wrote:

It is not a reflection on the ex-FM, any more than Laurence Fox reflects badly on Richard Ayoade. It is a reflection on the criminal concerned that he does not see his family connection as a reason to behave better.

 

You were doing so well on the first sentence then completely crashed and burned on the second.

The lack of reflection goes both ways.   Nice try though....

Avatar
GMBasix replied to Secret_squirrel | 3 weeks ago
0 likes

You're going to have to explain your comment.

Do you have some evidence that the ex-FM has any agency in this matter? If not, then the two-way reflection is not necessary in this context.

Pages

Latest Comments