Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Tour de France pro slams "heavier" Look bike for poor performance, but Cofidis team unimpressed and point out same "cutting-edge equipment" has been ridden to numerous big Grand Tour wins

Guillaume Martin revealed he went without a power meter and head unit during the Tour as his "7.7kg" bike was already "one kilo more than the UCI's permitted weight" and he did "not want to make it even heavier"...

Guillaume Martin — the Cofidis climber who finished 13th at the Tour de France, 43 minutes down on Tadej Pogačar — had plenty of feedback about his team's equipment, arguing his Look bike was too heavy and that he would have performed much better if it was not "one kilo more than the UCI's permitted weight", and without a power meter or head unit due to him not wanting "to make my bike even heavier".

Cofidis were unsurprisingly unimpressed by Martin's scathing comments about the team's sponsor Look, a statement promptly released on the French outfit's website pointing out that riders "actively participated" in the design of the bikes, built around a Look 795 Blade RS frame, with Shimano Dura-Ace groupsets and Corima wheels. The team also argued the "high-tech equipment" had been no hindrance to them when winning stages at the three Grand Tours preceding the race, including last year's Tour where Victor Lafay and Ion Izagirre both won stages.

Guillaume Martin interviewed at 2024 Tour de France (ASO/Billy Ceusters)

However, Martin, who is reportedly leaving Cofidis at the end of the season and was the highest French finisher on GC at this year's Tour, told Le Monde of his woes, and said "unfortunately" it is "not possible" to analyse his numbers as he went without a power meter and head unit during this year's race.

"Our bikes weigh 7.7 kilogrammes, one kilo more than the UCI's permitted weight. I do not want to make my bike even heavier with a bike computer and meter, which also weigh 200g," he said. "If you calculate with a bike that weighed a kilo too much, I wouldn't have finished 45 seconds behind the Pogačar group at the top of the Bonette. I could have stayed with them and also taken some time to eat. I would have felt better anyway if I knew that everything was better. We pay attention to weight with nutrition all year."

The bikes of the Tour de France 2024

> The bikes of the Tour de France 2024 — your definitive guide to what the top men's pro cycling teams are riding this year

Needless to say Cofidis were not too impressed by their climber's criticism of a major sponsor and released a statement headlined: "Cutting-edge equipment developed by our partners' engineers".

"The bikes used by all the riders were designed jointly with our performance department and the design and research offices of our partners," it began. "Some of our riders actively participated in this design by providing their expertise and sharing their feelings, to offer the team high-tech equipment.

"The weight of the bikes is an important subject of attention, but it is not the only performance factor. The bike used by Guillaume Martin is the subject of specific equipment choices so as not to exceed 7.4 kg, a measurement slightly below the average of the bikes of the best riders in the peloton.

2024 Look 795 pic: Getty Images
2024 Look 795 Blade RS Cofidis bike - pic Mathilde L'Azou

"Our riders benefit, with the LOOK 795 Blade RS frames, from cutting-edge equipment developed by our partners' engineers, offering a stiffness/aerodynamics/weight ratio approved by our riders for over a year. We are convinced that these performances have allowed us and will allow us to compete with our competitors. We have also won several victories in the 2023 Tour de France, the 2023 Vuelta and the 2024 Giro with this same bike and have just finished once again with the highest ranked French rider overall in this 2024 edition of the Tour de France.

"We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of our partners and especially the LOOK Cycle and CORIMA brands for their trust and the involvement of their teams who work alongside us to develop the best equipment for our riders."

> The history-making bikes of the 2024 Tour de France: check out these special yellow, green, polka dot and white bikes

Cofidis are not the first French team to be caught in the middle of a rider vs manufacturer bike-related argument this season. Florian Sénéchal said his Bianchi bike sounded like it was "becoming cardboard" on the cobbles of Paris-Roubaix, and revealed he changed four times due to "technical problems" and "carbon noises".

Paris Roubaix 2024 Josh Tarling and Florian Sénéchal (Zac Williams/SWpix.com)

"It wasn't going well with my bike," he said. "My fork or my stem was starting to give out. There were carbon noises and it was becoming cardboard. I got scared and stopped to change bikes. In any case, I couldn't go any faster because I couldn't pull on the handlebars. And I didn't want to fall on my collarbone.

> Tour de France bikes vs the bikes you can buy in the shops — are they actually the same?

"I had to change bikes four times. At the Carrefour de l'Arbre, the handlebars of my second bike came loose. I think that we have a technical problem with our bike and we'll have to look into it. It's annoying to always have problems. I didn't fall. The legs were there, the physical condition was there. I have nothing to prove myself and I have to be patient now. I didn't want to give up even though I hadn't had any luck yet."

Bianchi reacted with "surprise and concern" to the account and blamed the pro cycling team's mechanics for ignoring "specific instructions" about assembling handlebars, causing "disparities in the handling of the bicycles in competition".

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
Rapha Nadal | 1 month ago
1 like

I was under the impression that Look did have a light(er) climbing bike in their range? The Alpe d'Huez or something?

Avatar
NotNigel replied to Rapha Nadal | 1 month ago
0 likes

I think you're thinking of Time bikes.  My next bike hopefully.

Avatar
john_smith replied to NotNigel | 1 month ago
0 likes

Nice but pricey. And by the looks of the website they are no longer French :-(.

Avatar
whosatthewheel replied to Rapha Nadal | 1 month ago
0 likes

The 785 Huez RS and yes they still make it.

Avatar
mark1a replied to whosatthewheel | 1 month ago
0 likes

I think that's heavier than the Blade. 

Avatar
herrkaa | 1 month ago
0 likes

The original Le Monde article now has a blurb at the end, stating "deletion of the rider's comments on his bike, uttered under the influence of fatigue"

Avatar
anke2 replied to herrkaa | 1 month ago
1 like

And we know why he was so tired, after having lugged up the weight of two additional waterbottels.

Avatar
john_smith replied to anke2 | 1 month ago
0 likes

..

Avatar
thax1 | 1 month ago
2 likes

I was mildly surprised when reading about these pro bike weights in other recent articles eg https://www.bikeradar.com/features/tech/2024-tour-de-france-bike-weights

I'd always thought that they would all be very close to the UCI minimums of 6.8kg, and be adding weight tape or screwing their Wahoo Bolts onto the mount for UCI compliance.

Vingegaard does get his Cervelo down to 6.8, but Kristoff's Dare is 8kg!

Avatar
S.E. replied to thax1 | 1 month ago
2 likes

I remember reading the same, riders would just have to add weight, etc. and you can still find a lot of articles about this "controversial" UCI ruling, "74% of road.cc readers say the UCI's 6.8kg weight limit should be lowered or scrapped entirely"!

I guess the UCI's limit was well thought, else heavier disk brakes alone could not explain why bikes are now heavier than 25 years ago (+1 pound/500 g).

So maybe a light rider can safely go down to 6.8 kg or slightly lower, while someone larger/heavier needs something stronger, eg Vingegaard is 60 kg with a lighter bike than Kristoff (78 kg)...

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to S.E. | 1 month ago
4 likes

I assume its to avoid a race to the bottom which is frankly dangerous. Less margin for error in components, less carbon flying around when they crash and less likelihood of someone dying if their crazy light bike can't stand up to the abuse when flying down a mountain at 110kph. 

I have no issue with the weight limit. The argument against it feels a little like the argument that cyclists should just be allowed to dope freely. Nice idea in theory but people will do insane things to win. People would die. 

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to thax1 | 1 month ago
1 like

It is surprising, weren't there reports of bikes being weighed after stages to ensure ice was not used to make the weight at the begining, only to melt and disapear during the event. only a few years ago.

I guess it's all the Di2 and disc brakes adding weight to the bikes.

Avatar
Velophaart_95 | 1 month ago
0 likes

What is it about French teams/riders......

Cofidis have been a laughing joke for years - yet they continue to get invites to big races, so there's no incentive to improve/ overhaul the team. Do they know it's now 2024 and not 1994?

Avatar
anke2 | 1 month ago
3 likes

Some 900g overweight for a climbers weight of 55kg. I can see that Guillaume is not happy. I wonder what the team would say if he moved from, say, 10% bodyfat to 11,6% bodyfat.

Sure, some sprinters have more heavy bikes - but a pure climber???

For a steep 50min climb, the 900g would make up the 45s - or even more, given that after being dropped, he had to deal with more aerodynamic drag.

(Just to be clear - I'd take his bike in a taller size at any time - but I'm not a strong GC rider.)

Avatar
rct replied to anke2 | 1 month ago
0 likes

I believe Cofidis also have access to the lighter 785 frameset, which he could have used.

Avatar
galibiervelo | 1 month ago
4 likes

very unprofessional to be publically blaming the bike you get paid to ride

Avatar
Chris RideFar replied to galibiervelo | 1 month ago
2 likes

It's less unprofessional when considering that he's already "reportedly leaving Cofidis at the end of the season", so I guess he has a new contract signed and doesn't care about the sponsors of his old team. I appreciate his honesty. Modern bikes are better performers overall but they aren't as good at climbing as the previous generation with rim brakes - some teams were adding ballast to hit the 6.8 kg minimum weight.

Avatar
rct replied to Chris RideFar | 1 month ago
3 likes

No, still unprofessional.  I do agree re previous gen climbing bikes though.

Avatar
Miller replied to rct | 1 month ago
1 like

rct wrote:

No, still unprofessional.  I do agree re previous gen climbing bikes though.

Really? Strange that the 2024 Tour's leading riders on their heavy disc bikes have just washed away leading climb times set by riders on previous gen rim brake bikes.

 

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to Miller | 1 month ago
0 likes

These people are adamant science deniers

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Miller | 1 month ago
0 likes

Miller wrote:

rct wrote:

No, still unprofessional.  I do agree re previous gen climbing bikes though.

Really? Strange that the 2024 Tour's leading riders on their heavy disc bikes have just washed away leading climb times set by riders on previous gen rim brake bikes.

 

strange? or suspicious?

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to Chris RideFar | 1 month ago
0 likes

It's not hard to get a lot of modern bikes below 6.8kg. And get get that added benefit of a more aerodynamic bike, with faster, bigger tires.

Avatar
Veganpotter replied to galibiervelo | 1 month ago
0 likes

It really isn't. It is in this case because he has access to a lighter bike. But there are real problems with bikes. Look at MVDP and his bars that broke multiple times😂

Avatar
anke2 replied to Veganpotter | 1 month ago
2 likes

...comparing a 55kg climber, riding steadily below 400W, to a 75kg puncheur/sprinter/cobble rider who gets closer to 2000W? Just scaling bike weight with rider weight, the bike weights could have a ratio of 5,7kg/7,8kg...

(I certainly know that most bike parts can't be scaled efficiently. But lugging up the weight of two additional waterbottels on a cat. 1 climb mustt be frustrating outside training - these are not marginal gains!)

Latest Comments