At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
From CUK's perspective they'll argue that they've sufficiently put BCP through the mill re: following guidance and procedure. But there's better...
I think that may be the case in France but I'm not sure. That may explain the lorry drivers use of the horn.
Ah yes, the one mile "commute" - the maths/ probability would certainly support that. Delete pint of milk and a scratchcard and replace with...
Oh yes they are. ...
And a heads up that just clicking on someone's name sends them a notification.
Of course bikers are going to object how dare people think they have the right to be kept safe from law breakers on bikes . One way system , well I...
Correcto. Ffs, how many people in the whole of the UK actually have enough private land that they can need/use an unregistered vehicle which never...
As ever, don't know why wild bikes (go outdoors etc) are always missed off these lists. The equivalent of the frog 61 (identical in almost every...
There was a time when I would eagerly open up my Campag' levers to fix a problem with easily obtainable spare parts, using little more than a...
More chicken and egg problems / self-reinforcing systems....