At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Herein lies difference between cyclist and just people that happen to ride bikes. If it did happen, the person riding the bike wasn't a cyclist,...
The Bible is wildly-popular propaganda whose message is not agreed-on by virtually any two people who are familiar with it. That is a profound...
No, there are not. Not even close to that many involving vehicular killings by small-town cops....
Wrong again....
That's nearly as bad as 'wall crashed into car'.
A 7" spike to replace the steering wheel airbag, perhaps?
I think you need to flip the page in your Roget. The one you're on doesn't seem to fill you with Joie de vivre. Think grey and all you'll get is...
Bit reminiscent of the MTB world Jones bar. About the same price, too!
Well I was inspired by this discussion to try a 20 minute FTP test on Zwift yesterday and found to my surprise that according to it I'm not the 195...
But wouldn't you basically get the same information just by comparing the times it took you to ride it?