At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Exactly! With the added bonus of the manhole cover as scrap.
Funny how the BBC reports money for roads being spent on AT, but never reports that money for AT is spent on roads....
Yeah. Racing for GC isn't the best for him - in fact it's a waste of his talents. He needs to focus on one dayers, and MTB World Cups in the summer...
We have record numbers of police in Kentish Town (according to the local freesheet) but no one knows what they are doing. They cannot operate a...
I've not seen the Champions League incident, but I remember watching the Commonwealth games....
Now on Bluesky but have kept my Twitter account to stop someone taking it.
Sorry for the confusion......
And... Another reason to hate the excess of Christmas 🤢🤮
...mind you, Old Cary Grant's no angel in that department.
how the stretford Kingsway rework took best part of 18 months I have no idea but it was always going to be better afterwards, prior was a dual...