At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Cycle lanes - indeed, not so much use. Cycle *paths* and pavements? More so. They're not *sufficient*, yes. The same as hiding in your house -...
I think that was the point.
I'm not a roadie, and I've never ridden tyres narrower than 35mm...
To be even more pedantic, although I too can remember the free toys et cetera in cereal boxes, the original phrase was, "Did you get that by...
. Better that their apology was sincere, rather than fulsome. .
I'm not trying to rubbish case control studies but they need to be examined in context. They work really well for diseases as people contracting...
The other thing that occurs to me is that every battery operated thing I have ever experienced produced heat when in use. Every electirc motor I...
Since I've just come from another weekend post where I pointed out he's going a bit trollish - you guessed correctly....
You: apparently surprised that extra bureaucracy and data capture continued after it stopped being strictly necessary AND that people just accept...
Norvicians.