The Jetfly is Novatec's mid-range training wheelset, with a 32mm deep rim, a 21mm wide outer and 17mm inner. They're narrower than a lot of modern wheels, so you may not be able to run super-wide tyres. I used them with both 25s and 28s without any issues. The rims are also tubeless ready, although I used them with clinchers throughout the review.
At the front Novatec has used 20 spokes laced in a radial pattern, and 24 at the back in an 8/16 split, with a three-cross pattern on the drive side. These provide a decent amount of strength and responsiveness; they don't swallow up bumps and potholes, but even when I hit something big I was never worried that I might damage them.
Novatec has also included an innovative 3-in-1 hub that can be used across Campagnolo, Shimano, and SRAM. I used Shimano throughout the review and found that it worked well, with instant engagement and reaction to pressure on the pedals.
The hubs themselves spin up well and hold their speed well for a 32mm rim. This was one element of the wheels that I was particularly impressed by, given their weight and classification as training wheels.
One area where they could potentially be improved is stiffness: when I really pushed the pedals there was noticeable flex, and as somebody who likes to run hair-trigger brakes I found a little bit of rubbing when I was putting in the most effort. Once I loosened my brakes slightly this was less noticeable.
The rims have a machined braking surface, and they provided reliable and firm braking in both wet and dry conditions.
Novatec includes rim tape with the wheels, which is something less to worry about.
The wheelset comes in at 1,335g for the pair, which is very impressive for the money. Other mid-range wheels – Pacenti's Forzas, Fulcrum's Racing 4s, Campag's Zondas – all come in 100g+ heavier. Even the RSP Calavera Carbon CC35s that Stu looked at a couple of months ago that come in at over double the price are almost 200g more. This is the one element of the Jetflys (Jetflies?) that is the most impressive – simply that they are so light for the price and quality. To put that into perspective – the famously featherweight Lightweight Meilensteins are only 200g lighter.
Overall I was very impressed with these wheels: they spin up well and hold that speed, and have a very impressive weight for the price. They do have a bit of flex when you really put the power down, but it's not that big an issue when you can just open your callipers a little.
Lightweight and durable set of wheels that offer real bang for your buck, with just a bit of flex under load
Make and model: Novatec Jetfly SL wheelset
Size tested: 700C, 32mm deep
Tell us what the wheel is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?
These are training wheels designed to be both lightweight and hardy for everyday use.
Novatec says, "The perfect wheel for a training ride, Jetfly's 32mm-deep section rim feels like riding on a knife-edge."
I don't know about the knife edge element, but the rest is accurate.
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the wheel?
Novatec lists:
CATEGORY: CLINCHER
TYPE: ROAD RACING/TRAINING
RIM TYPE DEPTH: CLINCHER ALLOY 32MM
ETRTO ERD: 622-17 572.1MM
RIM FINISHING: BLACK MICRO PEEN
WEIGHT: F:630G R:825G
SPOKES NO.: 20/24 J-HOOK
SPOKES TYPE: STAINLESS DOUBLE BUTTED
SPOKES FRONT: L:10 x 277 R:10 x 277
SPOKES REAR: L:8 x 268 R:16 x 284
LACING: F:RADIAL R:RADIAL/3X
NIPPLE TYPE: BLACK/2 RED 14MM DSN ALLOY
EYELETS/VALVE HOLE: NO Ø6.2MM
HUBS: XA561SB, XF562SB
HUB FINISHING: BLACK ANO. POLISHED
AXLE F/R: AL 9X108X100, AL 10X140X130
CONVERTIBLE TO TUBELESS: TUBELESS READY
CASSETTE SHIM/SRAM/CAMP: SHIM. 11 UNIQUE 3IN1
MATERIAL OF CASS.BODY/COMPATIBILITY: ALLOY ABG [D2]
RIM VENDOR/RIM MODEL: RWA32C
RIM WEIGHT: 465G
BEARING SIZE: F:#689x2 R:#6802x1, #6902x3
HUB WEIGHT: F:65G R:235G
QUICK RELEASE: QR249
PARTS: 4 SPARE SPOKES AND NIPPLES
Rate the wheel for quality of construction:
7/10
They seem well made with excellent hubs and an effective braking surface, but they lose a couple of marks for the slight flex.
Rate the wheel for performance:
8/10
They perform very well, holding their speed well, spinning up quickly, and making climbing a cinch with their low weight.
Rate the wheel for durability:
8/10
Took them on some pretty pock-marked roads without any issues.
Rate the wheel for weight
9/10
For their price their weight is impressive, with even considerably more expensive wheels struggling to match them.
Rate the wheel for value:
8/10
Really good value for what they are; try to find a lighter pair of wheels for under £500 and you'd really struggle.
Did the wheels stay true? Any issues with spoke tension?
The wheels stayed true throughout, although the flex suggests they might need attention more frequently than others over time.
How easy did you find it to fit tyres?
Very easy. I used clinchers throughout and had two punctures during the review which were simple to fix by the side of the road due to the simplicity of fitting.
How did the wheel extras (eg skewers and rim tape) perform?
Very well, the rim tape didn't slip throughout the review period and the skewers worked well, with a particularly pleasing easy-to-grip machining making them easy to tighten.
Tell us how the wheel performed overall when used for its designed purpose
Very well, great for day-to-day riding, training rides, and you could probably even sling these on for particularly hilly races too.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the wheel
Their weight is easily their most impressive element.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the wheel
The slight flex when climbing or sprinting.
How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?
The Pacenti Forzas are £80 less, but are 80g heavier. Similarly Stu took a look at the Just Riding Along Lark Light Road wheelset at £414.80, which come in at 125g more.
Did you enjoy using the wheel? Yes
Would you consider buying the wheel? Yes
Would you recommend the wheel to a friend? Yes
Use this box to explain your overall score
Great bang for your buck – they are lightweight, spin up well, and hold their speed. The only thing that knocks a couple of marks off is that bit of flex during hard efforts.
Age: 29 Height: 6 ft Weight:
I usually ride: Cinelli Gazzetta My best bike is: Cannondale Supersix Evo
I've been riding for: Under 5 years I ride: Every day I would class myself as: Expert
I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, mountain biking
Add new comment
3 comments
This review is a little mixed up. It shows pictures of the Jetfly SL but quotes figures for the Jetfly.
Jetfly and Jetfly SL are two different wheelsets. Jetfly SL are essentially a rebranded Sprint wheelset.
Jetfly 32mm deep 1,455g/pair
Jetfly SL (formerly called Sprint) 23.4mm deep 1,335g/pair
I have run Jetfly (not the SL or Sprint versions) clinchers for over 4 years now which is 13,000 km according to my Strava figures. Still true and smooth running as they were when new. I live in the Yorkshire Dales where hills regularly reach 20% gradient in places so carbon clinchers would be worrisome going downhill due to overheating of the rims. Never experienced brake rub on them and they are a stiffer wheelset than my wife's Dura Ace C24s. The C24 are slightly more forgiving over rough roads. I regularly get into the top 20% on the up hill segments (at the age of 57) so these wheels are fast up hill.
Novatec spend very little money on marketing hence reviews are hard to come by. Would be great to have a side by side comparison of the Jetfly and the Jetfly SL to see if the added stiffness but greater weight of the Jetflys over the SL make a real life difference in performance.
I have a pair and I'd say they flex less than my Mavic Kysriums which are a little heavier. Is a bit of flex not inevitable on such lightweight aluminium clinchers?
Not sure if it's my brake pads or the cheapo calipers I've used with these wheels but they don't seem to break as well.
They look good. A fraction lighter than the CERO AR30 EVO and tubeless compatiable.