At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
The ecosphere impact assessment for the football world cup was pure greenwash, can we trust this to be any better?
Hmm... "Cyclists! Don't."
You can easily pick up a bottle of Teachers for less than that
On the plus side, this could add to the data about helmet efficacy, but it'll depend on having good figures for number of cyclists before and after...
I specifically said...
Pah! One bike? More than one wheel is only for the bimblers.
I have never bought Rapha, preferring Assos and Pearl Izumi, but my nephew has got quite a bit of Rapha, which he says is expensive and shite as it...
There was a case on here recently where a driver behind a cyclist at traffic lights hooted when the light turned green and then deliberately drove...
Great to see Mavic back in the game, but saying lightest in its category is so arbitrary. It just depends how you define the category
Pump truck maybe?