Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Cannondale CAAD8 Tiagra



If you're after a road bike at a price that scrapes in under the £1,000 mark then I'd say look no further: it's a very compelling package and great value to boot

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

I'm sorry to see you leave, Cannondale CAAD8, our acquaintance was too short. When you came into my life, I thought you'd be just another run of the mill bike. How you proved me wrong.

Cannondale have been making aluminium frames for donkey's years and their level of experience is evident from both the ride and construction quality. There is no shortage of technology that has gone into this frame: double-pass smooth welds, taper-butted tubes, assymetric chainstays, horizontally ovalised top tube and SAVE (Synapse Active Vibration Elimination) vibration-reducing stays to name a few.

Find the Cannondale CAAD8 Tiagra online
Find a Cannondale dealer

Many of these features have trickled down from the CAAD10 to the CAAD8 this year making a well liked frame even better. The CAAD8 now has Thinline seatstays, the top tube flowing smoothly around the seat tube into those seatstays. In fact, the whole rear triangle looks to be the same as that of the CAAD10. The main differences between the frames are that on the CAAD8 the head tube is not tapered and the down tube looks less "shaped", making both easier to produce.

While the CAAD8 shares the geometry of its siblings up the ladder, they've given it a slightly taller head tube to make the position a bit more relaxed. At 17cm for the size 56cm on test, this isn't classic sportive-bike tall, but it's certainly a bit taller than you'd want on an all-out performance beast (Cannondale use a 15.5cm head tube on their equivalently sized SuperSix). On paper, this might make it neither fish nor fowl, but in reality it makes for a really good position that efficiently rewards the effort you put in.

Just like on the Synapse range, the CAAD8 uses SAVE chainstays, a shape which "provides lateral rigidity while providing vertical compliance for bump absorption and comfort with no loss in power transfer". "Where have I heard that before?" I hear you thinking. I don't know whether it's the SAVE stays (my guess is it's to do with every little detail on this bike), but this IS a comfortable frame that isolates you from a lot of the road buzz you get on uneven surfaces.

As well as me,'s Mat got the big miles in on the CAAD8 and neither of us found it in any way harsh. That back end certainly doesn't kick like a mule. Even on rides of four or five hours it felt just fine, softening the ride just enough without wrapping you in cotton wool. Put it this way: neither of us got off feeling achy or beaten or anything like that. The only thing we disagreed on was the saddle. I liked it whereas Mat swapped it off after one ride moaning that it sagged in the middle... which just goes to prove that saddles, more than any other components, are a matter of individual taste.

The drops of the handlebars are nicely shaped and not too deep and, coupled with the slightly taller head tube, I found myself actually spending time on them rather than staying on the hoods the whole time. The bar tape, Cannondale's own 2.5mm suede with gel backing, has a really pleasant feel and works really well, even when wet. White, it looks the business when new, but gets dirty rather quickly. That's not a huge issue; it's easy and cheap to replace.

The bike is equipped with a Shimano Tiagra groupset and the big revelation for me was how excellent it has become. You get Tiagra shifters and derailleurs front and rear, a compact FSA Omega BB30 50/34 crankset and a 12-28 Tiagra 10-speed cassette. It's smooth as butter, works every time and the gearing is perfectly matched to the bike. I honestly see no reason to upgrade other than to save a little bit of weight, or if you like your cables to be tucked away under the bar tape – which is what you get with Shimano from 105 upwards.

The bike feels light and nimble while the steering is precise and descending is stable thanks to the carbon-bladed Cannondale Ultra fork. Braking, courtesy of Cannondale's own C4 dual pivots, is great. The cartridge pads (handy; it's easier to replace just the pads rather than the brake shoe) grip the rim well - the limiting factor is the friction between road surface and tyres rather than brake performance.

Speaking of the tyres, the Schwalbe Luganos work well in both the dry and wet. They are grippy and didn't puncture on me. Having said that, going for a more upmarket pair of tyres after these have worn out would be a worthwhile investment.

If there's one thing that could be improved, it's the wheels: they're Maddux RS 3.0 rims on Formula RB-51 hubs. There's nothing wrong with them as such, but they just didn't impress me. They didn't stay perfectly true, although they didn't go way out of line either. For the period I had the bike, I didn't have any trouble and the braking surface works well, but they just felt a little sluggish and heavy. Put a pair of decent wheels on and you'd lift the performance a couple of notches.

I think it's only fair to say at this point that, of course, you get what you pay for and I wouldn't expect a better pair of wheels at this price point - they are perfectly decent. I'm just saying that they are not matched to the quality and the performance of the frame. And if I could choose where to compromise on a bike budget I reckon the wheels are not a bad choice at all. They are easy to upgrade, it's good to have more than one pair for winter and summer use, and I'd rather have a decent frame and set of components with a mediocre pair of wheels than the other way around.

Talking about winter and summer use, there is actually provision for mudguard mounting on the frame and forks. The forks have eyelets where you'd expect them while on the rear triangle the bosses are halfway up and on the inside of the seatstays. I didn't get a chance to try mounting mudguards but I wouldn't fancy my chances of getting a pair of full mudguards in there with a tyre clearance I'd be happy with. A pair of thin mudguards like Salmons or such like would be a better bet. There are no bosses near the top of the seat stays for rack mounting.

You can get the CAAD8 with 105 for £100 more, or you can save yourself £200 and go for the Sora option. Personally, I think Tiagra is bang on the money for the CAAD8.


If you're after a road bike at a price that scrapes in under the £1,000 mark then I'd say look no further: it's a very compelling package and great value to boot

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website test report

Make and model: Cannondale CAAD8 Tiagra

Size tested: White - 56cm

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame: New CAAD8, Optimized 6061 Alloy, SAVE, BB30

Fork: Cannondale Ultra, carbon blades, 1-1/8in

Crank: FSA Omega BB30, 50/34

Bottom Bracket: FSA BB30

Shifters: Shimano Tiagra 4600

Cassette: Shimano Tiagra 4600, 12-28, 10-speed

Chain: KMC X10, 10-speed

Front Derailleur: Shimano Tiagra 4600, 31.8mm clamp

Rear Derailleur: Shimano Tiagra 4600

Rims: Maddux RS 3.0, 32 hole

Hubs: Formula RB-51, RB-52

Tyres: Schwalbe Lugano, 700x23c

Handlebar: Cannondale C4 Compact

Stem: Cannondale C4, 31.8mm, 6 deg.

Spokes: Stainless Steel, 15g

Bar tape: Cannondale 2.5mm Suede w/ gel backing bar tape

Saddle: Cannondale Stage Ergo w/ Steel Rails

Seat Post: Cannondale C4 alloy, 27.2mmx300mm

Shifters: Shimano Tiagra 4600

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

The Cannondale CAAD8 is the bottom of their Elite Road range which they describe thus: "While for many brands, the entry-level is simply an afterthought, Cannondale realizes that someone's first road bike purchase is often the most important they'll ever make. Totally re-designed for 2012, the new CAAD8 draws on our decades of aluminium engineering expertise to bring a remarkable level of performance to the entry-level road category. By far the lightest frame in its class (1450 grams), the Cannondale CAAD8 shares many of the features and tube shapes of our incredible CAAD10 and mates them with a slightly more forgiving heads-up race geometry. The trademark smooth double-pass welds, compliant SAVE rear stays, efficient assymetric chainstays and unmistakable Cannondale ride-feel make it clear that, rather than being just another aluminium road bike, this is something special."

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

You can tell that Cannondale have been making aluminium frames for donkey's years: the usual build quality and expertise is readily evident here.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame is made from 6061 aluminium alloy, the fork has carbon blades and an aluminium steerer tube.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

It shares the race geometry of other bikes in the range, with the exception of the head tube which is slightly taller at 17cm for a slightly more upright but still efficient position on the bike.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

The size 56 tested had a 56cm effective top tube and 17cm head tube (see above). The overall feel was still very much race as opposed to sportive/touring.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

The ride quality is superb. It's clearly a bike with a race heritage but made slightly more comfy with a taller head tube and all the vibration and road buzz reducing features described in the main text.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

The bike is plenty stiff, especially for an entry-level road bike. Bottom bracket area stiffness is taken care off by the BB30 bottom bracket. The wheels could have been a bit better.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Although not an out an out race best, the bike is plenty efficient. Cannondale have managed to tweak the race geometry without loosing efficiency.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Neutral

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

Handling is really good, as you'd expect from a decent race bike.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

I got on really well with the saddle for a change although Mat reported the exact opposite: saddles are a highly personal choice. I found the handlebars and the bar tape really comfortable too.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The FSA Omega compact chainset, by virtue of its BB30 design, makes for a stiff platform.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
Rate the bike for acceleration:
Rate the bike for sprinting:
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
Rate the bike for climbing:

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:

Tell us some more about the drivetrain. Anything you particularly did or didn't like? Any components which didn't work well together?

See main text: I was particularly impressed with how good Tiagra has become.

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels and tyres for performance:
Rate the wheels and tyres for durability:
Rate the wheels and tyres for weight:
Rate the wheels and tyres for comfort:
Rate the wheels and tyres for value:

Tell us some more about the wheels and tyres.Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the wheels or tyres? If so, what for?

I would change the wheels and tyres, but only when they wear out. I think a wheel upgrade would make this bike a class better, but that is true for any bike at this price. The Luganos are decent entry-level tyres, but performance could be improved by fitting something a bit lighter.


Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for weight:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Rate the controls for value:

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes! I don't want to give it back.

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Definitely

Rate the bike overall for performance:
Rate the bike overall for value:

Anything further to say about the bike in conclusion?

If you're after an entry-level road bike at a price that scrapes in under the £1,000 threshold for Cycle to Work schemes, I'd say look no further: it's a very compelling package and great value to boot.

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 32  Height: 1.78m  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: All of them!  My best bike is: Cervelo Dual

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, touring, club rides, fixed/singlespeed, Audax


Add new comment


chriscadman | 11 years ago

I bought the CAAD 8 around 18 months ago and it is AWESOME!!!

However, I do highly agree with changing the wheels sooner rather than later. I had the rear spokes pop on me a couple of times which is rather annoying especially as the first time it happened half way through a 100 mile sportive. I thought that I was just unlucky with the wheel set but a friend of mine bought the latest CAAD 8 this year (same wheels) and lo and behold one of his rear spokes popped a couple of weeks back.

Apart from that long live the CAAD 8!

freelander | 11 years ago

What is there, if anything, to choose between the Synapse Tiagra and the CAAD8 Tiagra?

Looked at the Specialized equivalents but the spec on the Cannondales overshadows them for the price. This will be a first venture into road biking from 30 years of mtb, brought about through a fitness need with the intention of participating in a few events (London to Brighton, duathlons etc)

Appreciate your views ahead of finding a LBD with a range of models for a comparative assessment

mguibout | 11 years ago

I bought the CAAD8 105 2012 about 2 months ago and absolutely love it. Also tested the Giant Defy 1, Merida Race Lite 904, Trek 2.1 and the Cannondale Synapse 105. In the end it was a close run thing between the Trek and the CAAD8, but settled on the CAAD8 as it felt a little sharper and the paint job is the business! This isn't as upright a geometry as the Synapse which i found a little too easy, but isn't an all out racing position either, so perfect for me.

I ride for leisure not commuting mainly, and this bike has the perfect combination of race & comfort. I have been spending much more time on the compact drops compared to my previous bike and the ride is pretty smooth even on bumpy roads. The handling is excellent at all speeds. Build quality seems very good, which i'd expect from Cannondale.

fourstringsisplenty | 11 years ago

I have one of these, bought earlier this year in France for riding in the Southern Alps (during the worst winter for snow ever...).

Mine's a triple rather than a compact, but otherwise exactly the same as the bike above. I can't do more than agree with the review: having bought it with no particular expectations, mainly because it was the only size 56 in the local bike shop, I've found the CAAD8 an amazing bike for the money, an incredible blend of comfort and directness. Every part seems well thought through, and the frame itself is superb.

I didn't have the option when I bought mine, but for what it's worth I'm not sure I'd recommend paying extra for the 105: Tiagra works extremely well. The main difference is that the Gossamer crankset that comes on the 105 is about 250g lighter, I think.

(Note on the spacers: there are a lot on the bike as shipped, which gives a good range of riding positions. But you can cut the fork down so that there's just the 170 mm head tube plus the 25 mm triangular stack, which gives a low, stretched position when combined with the 110 mm stem.)

Trev Allen | 12 years ago

Call me biased but the Canyon roadlite with 105 for £839 seems like a much better deal. Decent wheels too

Yemble | 12 years ago

17cm.. plus 60mm of spacers below the stem!


russyparkin | 12 years ago

i assume the new tiagra is pretty much just the 105 5600 with different stickers this year?

Raleigh | 12 years ago

The new Tiagra looks, hmmm... Sick

russyparkin | 12 years ago

@fishnchips, i have to say the team colours nearly had me stump up the extra cash, but then i gave myself a slap and realised an extra £400 for a paint job was insane, what with selling the nearly new 105 and replacing the bits with some good deals on ultegra on ebay i have turned it to nearly full ultegra for £1100. and the garmin is one of the best toys i have ever purchased.

i will get paint envy though if someone has the 2012 version but then i will think how much prettier my bank balance is  4

Farky | 12 years ago

Considering this bike but in 2012 105 which is £1049 in most stores.

Wheels are my biggest issue or idve bought it already, cant really afford more than £1k. Also loking at Felt Z85 for 899 with 105 and cash for decent pedals.

Fish_n_Chips | 12 years ago

Maybe a 105 2011 CAAD10 is a better option but for someone who wants a 2012 bike in team colours -they'll buy it or be pushed to buy a CAAD10.

russyparkin | 12 years ago

i have a caad10 and i picked it over 2-3 other bikes on my shortlist. my budget was up to 2k but got a 2011 caad10 with 105 for 899. its just beyond fast and urges you to go faster. i used to hate cannondales and vowed never to touch one. definition of cutting my own nose off. ended up putting some ultegra wheels/ultremo tyres and a few other shiny ultegra bits on it bringing it down to 7.2kg and a garmin edge and still have lots of change left out of my top end budget. happy happy days!

Goatkarma | 12 years ago

@seabass89 I've been using a CaadX as a winter bike since September and love it! Changed the wheels for some cheap fulcrums with slicks, added mudguards and it flies! Not too heavy and super reliable  16 Done 5000KM on it now and not had to fiddle with it at all. Geometry does play a factor though-it's a bit more sit up and beg then the cannondale road bikes.

seabass89 | 12 years ago

Cannondale seems to be making some nice bikes lately.. I rarely see a bad review..

Performance wise (not geometry)..
Whats the difference between a Caad8, and a CaadX with slicks on it, I wonder..

I am wondering becasue I am thinking about doing just that and hopping into a sportive or two this summer, just to get some practice/experience..

Latest Comments