Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Lapierre Sensium 200 CP (2013)



Fun, comfortable, dependable, good-looking, and upgradeable - what's not to like?

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Lapierre Sensium 200 CP (2013)is a carbon bike that's well worth looking at if you're in the market for a bike just above £1,000, and it's a chassis that certainly has upgrade potential.

It's great when a plan comes together. Lapierre's plan for the Sensium 200 was no doubt to create a good value, well-specced carbon bike that's fun to ride. And they pretty much nailed it. This is a lovely bike to ride, and at £1,300 it's well within reach of many riders, even if it falls outside of normal cycle-to-work limits. You'll want to go a lot further than work, anyway.

The Sensium is a new frame for Lapierre. In fact, it's two new frames: the cheaper 100 and 200 use a carbon monocoque of fairly standard construction, whereas the frame that gets built into the 300, 400 and 500 bikes benefits from the inclusion of an elastomer in the seatstay which Lapierre claim reduces vibration by up to 25% over their top-end Xelius frameset whilst keeping the same lateral stiffness. The frame of this bike has to make do with just the damping qualities of the carbon itself. Both frames have been developed in conjunction with Koga.

It's a nice looking frame, too. The top tube is slightly convex along its length, and flattened to a squarish section giving a flat top surface for a nice big graphic. The down tube is more triangular than anything at the asymmetric head tube, flattening out to a horizontal oval at the press-fit bottom bracket for maximum area. The chainstays and wishbone seatstays are pretty chunky and more or less circular in section. The frame is mated to a full-carbon tapered-steerer fork that's a more or less straight blade, with a flat inside face and a curved outer.

Geometry-wise you could call it a sportive bike, or you could call it a race bike. It's somewhere in the middle. The 20cm head tube and 58.5cm effective top tube on our 58cm test bike is certainly lower and longer than some low- and mid-range bikes we've seen. in terms of pure numbers the closest match we could find was Wilier's Gran Turismo, which Wilier describe as a sportive bike but with a race geometry. So that's nice and clear.

Kit-wise, transmission is mostly Shimano 105; the chainset and brake calipers are non-series to save a bit of cash. Wheels are Shimano's dependable R500s, with Michelin Dynamic Sport tyres. The finishing kit is Ritchey alloy bits for the most part, which don't normally disappoint in terms of bang-per-buck, and faux-leather white bar tape (to match the white hoods on the 105 levers) and a white Selle Italia X1 saddle complete the deal.

Enough talk about the pieces, let's sling a leg over the Sensium 200 and see how it rides. Straight from the off the impression is of a purposeful but comfortable bike. The Sensium frame might look quite chunky at the rear in comparison to some, but it's not a harsh ride at all. The ride sensation isn't just down to the frame of course; the tyres, wheels, seatpost and saddle all have a role in transferring – or not – those bumps to your back end. Even with an alloy seatpost and a 23mm tyre, though, the Sensium does a great job of smoothing things over. Swap up to some 25mm tyres and a carbon 'post and you'd probably be moving into 'plush' territory.

The same is true at the front. The tapered fork makes for a direct feel to the steering but even with a straight-leg fork it doesn't feel harsh. The Ritchey Logic Curve bars undoubtedly help here. As alloy bars go they're one of my favourites, really eating up road shock, especially on the drops. And because the drops are reasonably shallow you can spend a bit more time there.

So that's good then. Nice and comfy. Even the Selle Italia X1, which isn't my favourite perch by a long stretch, didn't really put the dampeners on things. In terms of riding position it's certainly a bit lower than many sportive bikes I've tried. It's amazing how much an centimetre added on or lopped off can affect the feel of a bike, and the Sensium feels racy for what's not a particularly expensive machine.

The shallow bars accomodate fairly long stints in the drops too, which is good when you're taking it in turns at the front. When you need to change direction the bike is very eager. It's not twitchy but it is fairly lively, and for the most part in an enjoyable way. In fact the whole ride is lively; get out of the saddle and give it some beans and the Sensium doesn't feel monolithic like some carbon bikes, it's responsive without feeling flexy. You'd struggle to induce any noticeable flex in the well-built bottom bracket; the chainstays aren't as big as has become the norm on carbon race bikes but they're well capable of taking the strain.

Climbing is excellent, with masses of traction from the Michelin tyres in all the conditions we tried, which was most conditions you could expect... whether that's the tyres or the chassis or a product of both it's hard to say.

At 8.4kg it's not in the super-lightweight bracket but the Sensium is quite happy to spin up any climb you're likely to encounter, with a 34/28 bottom gear for the steep stuff. Stand up and put the hammer down and it's happy to respond. It'd be easy enough to drop the best part of a kilo from the overall weight without really trying; a light wheel and tyre combo and a carbon seatpost and lighter saddle would probably knock 700-800g from the overall.

Shifting is predictable and unremarkable, in that Shimano 105 way. 105 is probably my personal favourite groupset - you get such a lot for your money these days. The downgrades don't affect function too much. The chainset is heavier but other than that you won't really notice the difference; the calipers have Shimano's scratchy-but-effective stock blocks. They'll stop you fine but an upgrade of a decent cartridge pad will make everything happen with a bit more finesse. I haven't needed to do anything to the drivetrain at all, save for wind the brake blocks in a bit.

So it's all good then? Well, the R500 wheelset isn't the best you'll ever use. They're fairly heavy and not particularly stiff. On the plus side ours were neatly built and stayed true throughout testing, although they did have a rather large burr on the rear braking surface which gouged a hole in the brake pad and made a bit of a racket until we attacked it mid-ride with the multitool. It's not unusual at all to see R500s on a bike at this kind of price and they're the simplest (and most effective, normally) upgrade you can make. It's up to you to make a call as to whether a bike deserves something better. This bike certainly deserves something better, it's crying out for a pingy 1,500g set of hoops to really get things going. Everything about the ride, except for the R500s, feels like a more expensive machine. So be happy that you're getting a great ride for your money and start saving now for some summer wheels.

A ringing endorsement? Yes, more or less. Okay the wheels aren't the greatest but as a package for £1,300 it's good value and an involving ride. The position is comfortable yet purposeful, the frame is excellent and well matched to the good value componentry.


Fun, comfortable, dependable, good-looking, and upgradeable - what's not to like? test report

Make and model: Lapierre Sensium 200 CP (2013)

Size tested: 58cm

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.



Headset : FSA ORBIT TAPERED 1"1/8-1"1/4


Crankset : SHIMANO 105 COMPACT 34X50


Seatpost : RITCHEY OE 2BOLTS 27,2x300MM


Front derailleur : SHIMANO 105 COMPACT

Rear derailleur : SHIMANO 105 COMPACT 34X50

Brakes : SHIMANO 561 BLACK

Shifters : SHIMANO 105 2X10


Wheel : SHIMANO WH-R501

Sprocket : SHIMANO TIAGRA 10S 12-28


Weight : 8,4 kg

Size : 46 - 49 - 52 - 55 - 58

Price : £1 299,99

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

With a 100% renewed frame, better internal cable routing and numerous innovations, Sensium bicycles maintain their core position with passionate riders. All models are Di-2 compatible, come with a press fit BB and a new head tube.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

Tidily made and nicely finished.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

58cm stated size

58.5cm effective top tube

20cm head tube

73.5° head angle

72° seat angle

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

Fitted very well, slightly racier than the sportive norm.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

Really good overall ride. Responsive enough to be interesting, stable enough to not give you any surprises.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

Balance was really good.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Very well, some wheel rub but that was down to the wheels, not the frame.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?


How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Just on the lively side of neutral

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

It goes where you point it, and responds well to rider input. It's stiff enough at the front; not the stiffest I've ridden but direct nonetheless.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

The saddle's not one of my favourites. The handlebars are excellent.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The wheels are the main culprit.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's efficiency? would you recommend any changes?

Wheels again.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
Rate the bike for acceleration:
Rate the bike for sprinting:
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
Rate the bike for climbing:

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels and tyres for performance:
Rate the wheels and tyres for durability:
Rate the wheels and tyres for weight:
Rate the wheels and tyres for comfort:
Rate the wheels and tyres for value:


Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for weight:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Rate the controls for value:

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes.

Rate the bike overall for performance:
Rate the bike overall for value:

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 40  Height: 190cm  Weight: 102kg

I usually ride: whatever I'm testing...  My best bike is: Genesis Equilibrium with SRAM Apex

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, sportives, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, mtb, Mountain Bike Bog Snorkelling, track


Dave is a founding father of, having previously worked on Cycling Plus and What Mountain Bike magazines back in the day. He also writes about e-bikes for our sister publication ebiketips. He's won three mountain bike bog snorkelling World Championships, and races at the back of the third cats.

Add new comment


Tony Farrelly | 11 years ago

It's the late nights he's spent working on the game  3

Hmm… maybe I should re-phrase that

londonplayer | 11 years ago

Dave looks as if he has lost a lot of weight?  39

tomascjenkins | 11 years ago

Liking the buy it local button! Cheers.

Latest Comments