Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

review

Roval Rapide CLX

9
£1,850.00

VERDICT:

9
10
Stupidly fast carbon deeps that handle winds and hills brilliantly. But not tubeless...
Stiff
Fast
Handle well
Light
Not tubeless
Weight: 
1,410g

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Roval Rapide CLX sets out to be the fastest wheelset in the real world, and is so committed to weight and aero optimisation it forgoes tubeless compatibility. That will certainly divide opinion, but there's little doubt the result is a stupidly fast wheelset that balances the aero benefits of deep rims and the weight savings and improved handling of far shallower wheels.

Roval has pedigree in fast wheels: their CLX 64 has dominated time trials, the CLX 32s took Alaphillippe to a Polka Dot jersey and the CLX 50 is frequently found on stage-winning bikes. The new Rapide CLX wheelset aims to squash all their best traits into one wheelset to do everything fast, and combines a 51mm deep front with a 60mm rear for the aero of a deep wheelset without losing controllability when the wind picks up.

> Find your nearest dealer here

Unbox these wheels and it's not the depth that draws attention, but the width. At the back you find a 30.7mm external width, which is pretty wide and helps prevent the modern trend of 25mm and 28mm road tyres 'ballooning' on the rims. For comparison the Campagnolo Bora WTO 60 Disc wheelset measures up at 26.1mm, and that's by no means narrow!

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - logo.jpg

And then there's the front rim at a whopping 35mm external width! Yep a whole 3.5cm of rim – enough to dwarf most road tyres, and pretty radical. Even gravel rims are rarely this wide.

Typical frame clearances mean that a few years ago, it simply wouldn't have been possible, but why the change now? Roval says the width makes the Rapides to be more stable, and claims a 25% improvement in gusting wind over the CLX 50.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - detail.jpg

As the CLX 50 has been my wheelset of choice for the past two years, I was eager to test these claims. I didn't have to wait long to find out, as even my first ride was positively blustery and yet I'm not having to write this from a ditch. The Rapides aren't just impressive for their depth, but impressive full stop.

Despite being quite light, I found it easy to forget I was on 50mm-plus wheels and, despite plenty of windy weather over the last month and a bit, I never wanted to swap to something shallower.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - detail 2.jpg

We measured these at a 10g over the claimed 1400g, but that's still extremely impressive, and lighter than the shallower, narrower CLX50 (1415g).

The lack of mass means the Rapides to accelerate quickly and climb with amazing ease – I've set plenty of climbing PRs during this test, despite my previous efforts being on tubular wheels designed specifically for climbing.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - rear hub.jpg

At the centre sits Roval's new 'AeroFlange' hub, stuffed with DT Swiss' new EXP freehub internals. If they're anything like the outgoing internals we're on to a winner, and so far, so good.

I've put about 2000km on them in all conditions and all is well; the sealed ceramic cartridge bearings still spin smooth and fast, and despite hitting some invisible potholes at a fair whack, both wheels remain true and unscarred.

Up front are just 18 DT Swiss Aerolite T-head spokes, while the rear gets and an equally sparse 24. Nevertheless, stiffness is exceptional. As you'd expect from kit that Sagan, Ackermann and the like use in earnest, the Rovals encountered no issues from my sprinting... they feel direct and fast. Oh, and they sound good whilst you do it.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - front hub.jpg

I tested the wheels with several tyres and tubes – Vittoria Corsas, GP5000s and Maxxis Highroads – and all went on without issue. Tube choice varied between lightweight butyl and a set of Tubolitos to maximise the weight advantage. I found the Rapide's 21mm ID (up ever so slightly from the CLX 50's 20.7mm) widened all the tyres beyond their claimed widths.

Roval says you can expect around a 2mm growth over a traditional road wheel, and I found this pretty accurate (the 25mm Continentals and Vittoria's measured 26.5mm, whilst the 28mm Highroads were 29.8mm).

> 40 of the best road bike tyres - rubber for speed, durability and puncture resistance

The rims are optimized for 26-28mm tyres – certainly the 28s do look more natural than 25s, especially on the front. This does seem a bit alien for racing, but it's certainly comfortable for training.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - rim bed.jpg

The only heavy thing about these wheels is the elephant in the room – their lack of tubeless compatibility. Roval has taken an almost Prime Ministerial U-turn on this, and the Rapides (alongside the new Alpine wheelset) are strictly for tubes only. Stickers on the rims and text on the tapes are there to really hammer it home.

2020 Roval Rapide CLX wheelset - detail 3.jpg

Now, I never found the older CLX50s the easiest to fit tubeless tyres on, but having manufacturers bash on about it being quicker did encourage me to make the leap. I, like many, am still on the fence about them, and this move from Roval only adds to the confusion. That's not to say I've had a problem running tubes – I haven't – but it would be nice to have the choice.

> 44 of the best road bike wheels — reduce bike weight or get aero gains with new hoops

So, you've just got over that hurdle, here's the next: they cost £1850. That's quite clearly not cheap, but it is somehow better than a lot of the alternatives. The Lightweight Lightweight Meilenstein C Disc wheels (1370g) are marginally lighter but cost £4799 and don't cope in winds as well... no comment needed with that one.

That set of Campagnolo Bora wheels mentioned earlier is nowhere near as light at 1590g, and is £1928.99.

We also tested the Bontrager Aelous XXX 4 TLR, which at 1420g are close, but they're not as deep and are £1999.98. If the ability to run tubeless is not an issue, the Rapides are extremely well priced against the competition.

Overall

While the lack of tubeless compatibility does seem a bit of a backwards step, the rest of the performance is a giant leap forwards.

Never have I used wheels that feel quite so at home whether on a 30% incline or a group sprint. The stiffness is incredible, the DT Swiss parts mean spares are readily available, and they handle exceptionally. If you want to make your bike faster, these are the quite expensive answer.

Verdict

Stupidly fast carbon deeps that handle winds and hills brilliantly. But not tubeless...

road.cc test report

Make and model: Roval Rapide CLX

Size tested: 700c

Tell us what the wheel is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Roval say these wheels are for "Real Speed For The Real World: With the Rapide CLX, we set out to build the fastest all-around wheelset that money can buy. Stellar climbing performance meets slippery aero efficiency, with confident handling regardless of wind conditions."

These wheels are for anyone who wants to go fast whether on the flat or up hills, and they handle exceptionally well – but it's disappointing they aren't compatible with tubeless tyres.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the wheel?

From Roval:

RIM WIDTH - 21mm internal, 35mm external F/21mm internal, 30.7mm external R

RIM DEPTH - 51mm F/60mm R

SPOKE - Radial/Two-cross (2:1) F/One-cross/Two-cross (2:1) R

SPOKE COUNT - 18F/24R

SPOKE TYPE - DT Swiss Aerolite T-head

NIPPLE TYPE - DT Swiss Pro Lock hexagonal

HUB - Roval AeroFlange Disc, Centerlock, Sealed Cartridge bearings, DT Swiss EXP internals, HG Freehub, 142x12mm thru-axle compatible

ASSEMBLY METHOD - Handbuilt

EXTRAS - Roval padded wheelbag. Lifetime warranty.

WEIGHT - 1400 grams (wheelset)

649 grams (F) / 751 grams (R)

Rate the wheel for quality of construction:
 
9/10

A brilliant fusion of Roval rims and hubs with DT Swiss's reliable internals, spokes and nipples.

Rate the wheel for performance:
 
10/10

Stunning. They're stiff, accelerate amazingly, and are so light it helps everywhere.

Rate the wheel for durability:
 
9/10

I've hit some potholes hard and they're still true. DT Swiss' EXP ratchet freehub is supposedly extremely durable, though it hasn't been around long enough for anyone to prove that... certainly the nipples and spokes are readily available if you do break one. Also, the alloy Freehub isn't soft like on some lightweight wheels, so hasn't got chewed up by the cassette.

Rate the wheel for weight
 
9/10

1400g for a 51mm/60mm wheelset speaks for itself.

Rate the wheel for value:
 
4/10

They're obviously not cheap, and good £1000 carbon wheelsets aren't far behind in terms of performance. However these are the pinnacle of performance, and for that you pay a premium – their true competition cost at least this much, and in most cases a lot more.

Did the wheels stay true? Any issues with spoke tension?

No issues to report.

How easy did you find it to fit tyres?

Easy.

How did the wheel extras (eg skewers and rim tape) perform?

Rim tape is pre-installed, and the wheel bags are high quality.

Tell us how the wheel performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Very impressive performance in all scenarios. I had no issues riding them everywhere, over everything and all of the time.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the wheel

Its hard to choose... they're light?

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the wheel

They're not tubeless.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?

Surprisingly well – the weight is really hard to beat at this price (the new wheels coming from Bontrager might come a bit closer in future). From the current competition, though, you have to sacrifice either weight, depth, handling or a whole pile of money.

Did you enjoy using the wheel? Yes

Would you consider buying the wheel? Yes

Would you recommend the wheel to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

With the option to run tubeless they could be a 10, but even so these are exceptional wheels. They can climb, sprint, cruise and – unlike many wheels this deep – handle poor weather as well.

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 22  Height: 6ft  Weight: 74kg

I usually ride: Specialized venge pro 2019  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: 5-10 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, time trialling, cyclo cross, commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding, mtb,

Jamie has been riding bikes since a tender age but really caught the bug for racing and reviewing whilst studying towards a master's in Mechanical engineering at Swansea University. Having graduated, he decided he really quite liked working with bikes and is now a full-time addition to the road.cc team. When not writing about tech news or working on the Youtube channel, you can still find him racing local crits trying to cling on to his cat 2 licence...and missing every break going...

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
Christopher TR1 | 3 years ago
0 likes

yes, yes, expensive but maybe.....

....ah, disc brake only. Pity. Did the article even mention that (I skimmed it looking for the info)? Or is it just assumed that all proper roadies have bought the latest Tarmac SL7 by now?

Avatar
pablo | 3 years ago
2 likes

They spent alot of money pushing tubless last year and then the new wheelset doesn't use it.  Lets be honest because they won't they laid all the tools up and then found in testing it didn't work.  Rather than go back to the drawing board and recut the tools they pushed them out the door.  I would imagine they'll launch a new wheel next year or the year after with a better engineering solution.  

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to pablo | 3 years ago
2 likes

I suspect they'll launch the same wheel next year but with the "no tubeless" stickers removed and try to get 2 bites of the cherry from gullible punters. 

Avatar
CME15 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Be interested to see how these compare on the road to the recently reviewed Parcours Strade. Similar rim profiles (on paper) though tubed vs tubeless. Parcours do DT Swiss hub upgrades for an additional fee which would bring them even closer on specs.

Avatar
Prosper0 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Firstly. "Win-tunnel" - as a thing - needs to go. It's not clever, it's goofy. 
Secondly, inner tubes required? Mega fail Specialized, why would anyone buy 2 grand non tubeless wheels right now? Even if you don't use tubeless you'd want the choice and for your investment to be future proof. 

Avatar
Rapha Nadal | 3 years ago
3 likes

Tubeless on road is rubbish, and largely unrequired, so hats off the Specialized for binning it.  Keep it for off road ventures.

Avatar
sparrowlegs replied to Rapha Nadal | 3 years ago
4 likes

Absolute bollocks. 

If you can't get tubeless to work on the road in this day and age then it's because you're inept. 
 

I've been using tubeless on the road since 2015, maybe even earlier and I've never had an issue or a puncture. Sure, some rim/tyre combos need a little more attention than others but the technology and the benefits are proven and nothing will sway me away from tubeless. 
 

I've converted even the most ardent anti-tubeless friends (in both ways). It only takes a few punctures out on rides while I sit there watching them change a tube. 
 

Look at the Hunt 48 limitless, Scribe 50 D+ Wide and Parcours Strade. All way way cheaper, not much heavier (taking into account the full system weight when you add tubes) and who says they are any slower than the Rovals? Oh, and all tubeless compatible. 
 

For the sake of what? 20, 30 or maybe even 50 grams Specialized went with tubes? Like the reviewer says, it all comes down to choice. You can run a tubeless compatible wheelset with tubes...

Avatar
Rapha Nadal replied to sparrowlegs | 3 years ago
2 likes

is it though?  I've seen enough fuck ups with tubeless set ups on road to give it a wide berth and guess what the rescue option has always been - an inner tube.  

Road punctures are few & far between so it's completley unrequired.  As I said; keep it to the off road and/or gravel rides where it's absolute gold.

Avatar
CME15 replied to Rapha Nadal | 3 years ago
0 likes

Yeah it is actually. You'd have to be a complete numpty or have incredibly bad luck these days to not sort tubeless out easily. Fair play to those that want stay with tubes as they clearly still perform well. The biggest issue with tubeless is what combination of wheel and tyre will get you the best result and manufacturers of both can't seem to agree on standards

Avatar
cw91 replied to sparrowlegs | 3 years ago
0 likes

The reason the other wheels mentioned are heavier is that they can support a tubeless tyre.  If you go too light on the rim then you lose the strength required to maintain a rigid rim when you add the radial force from a tubeless tyre - because the tyre pressure is exerted across the entire inner rim channel (rather than contained within a tube), the inward force is greater.  My guess is that Spesh went too light on the rim design then found that their rims went floppy when set up tubeless.  They were obviously designed to be tubeless if you look at the inner rim channel...

Avatar
CME15 replied to cw91 | 3 years ago
0 likes

That's not entirely true, the new Zipp 303 Firecrest wheelset is hookless, tubeless only and weighs 1350 grams. However I agree that somewhere along the line Roval realised they had an issue and backed off tubeless. Maybe they haven't tested widely enough to come up with a list of certificated tyres like Enve have for their AR series?

Avatar
cw91 replied to CME15 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Fair point, although when you go hookless you save the weight on the bead hooks.  So not a fair comparison really.

Avatar
Gd29 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Would Hunt Limitless 48s offer similar gust resistant handling without paying the Spesh premium?

Avatar
WDG replied to Gd29 | 3 years ago
0 likes

My guess is Spesh couldn't come up with the Hunt solution of making a wide rim light and tubeless, so went with the former.  Bit of a fail in my eyes, and I won't be moving from my CLX50s even if they are better in certain conditions.

Avatar
Mathemagician replied to WDG | 3 years ago
1 like

Hunt limitless are 200g heavier than these, so let's not pretend there aren't compromises with the "Hunt solution".

Curious to know what else from the DT Swiss hubs have made it over to these wheels, as they're clearly not just rebadged 240's. I wish wheels could be reviewed with some more information on bearings, etc...£1800 is a lot of money to spend on something if it's running on some crappy EZO bearings in some random sizes that can't be readily purchased off the shelf. For that kind of money if want something that was easily serviceable at the bare minimum.

Avatar
Glov Zaroff replied to Mathemagician | 3 years ago
0 likes
Mathemagician wrote:

Hunt limitless are 200g heavier than these, so let's not pretend there aren't compromises with the "Hunt solution". Curious to know what else from the DT Swiss hubs have made it over to these wheels, as they're clearly not just rebadged 240's. I wish wheels could be reviewed with some more information on bearings, etc...£1800 is a lot of money to spend on something if it's running on some crappy EZO bearings in some random sizes that can't be readily purchased off the shelf. For that kind of money if want something that was easily serviceable at the bare minimum.

As with all of the wheels in the CLX range, these are fitted with CeramicSpeed coated bearings that come with a six year warranty. 

Avatar
WDG replied to Mathemagician | 3 years ago
0 likes

Never said it was faultless - but add the tubes in and the difference may reduce depending on your set up, and the Hunts are £600 cheaper with the Ceramicspeed bearings.  As stated, I think Spesh had a choice to make between the best aero, weight and tubeless compatibility, and dropped the latter.  Apparently they aren't going to do tubulars either, so I think they are putting all their eggs in one basket.  I just think it's the wrong basket.

Avatar
Mathemagician replied to WDG | 3 years ago
0 likes

I wasn't claiming you said it was faultless, but you did say:

Quote:

My guess is Spesh couldn't come up with the Hunt solution of making a wide rim light and tubeless, so went with the former.

Which suggests that the Hunt wheels are wide, light and tubeless. And I'm saying they're not, they're wide and tubeless, but not particularly light. So you're either compromising on weight or you're compromising on tubeless compatibility. FWIW I run tubeless and so also think not going tubeless is a bit of a weird choice, but there are plenty who are happy with tubes so I guess for them it's no great shakes.

Avatar
cw91 replied to Gd29 | 3 years ago
0 likes

I'm more interested in how both the Roval wheels here and the Parcours Strade the other day are now using different rim shapes and widths for the front wheel verus the rear.  Is this where wheel development is heading now?

I guess if we're hitting peak aero then you look at things like handling performance?

Avatar
CME15 replied to cw91 | 3 years ago
0 likes

The Enve AR series have the same - u shaped front and v shaped rear, deeper rear wheel. Supposedly the rear wheel is less influenced by side winds (which makes sense). Would love to see a comparison of the Rapide and the Strade.

Avatar
JMcWatt replied to Gd29 | 3 years ago
0 likes

If you don't might a 200g weight difference and a bog standard 4PAWL freehub. I think I'd be saving my cash, reducing my weight and going for a set of Scribe aero wide 50s with a ratchet freehub, with the money saved I could put whatever bloody bearings I wanted in. 

Avatar
CME15 replied to JMcWatt | 3 years ago
0 likes

the Scribe wides are 'only' 21mm internal and 30mm external and optimised for 25mm tyres, the Strade is 22.5mm internal and 32.5/31mm external specifically for 28mm tyres which I'd be I interested in. Parcours do DT Swiss 180/240 for an additional charge...Agree the Scribes look good and would be interesting to see them compared with the name brands for real world performance.

Avatar
jacknorell | 3 years ago
0 likes

It's a bit odd to keep the shoulder for tubeless tyres if not compatible. I suppose might hold the tyre on better if flat though

Avatar
Compact Corned Beef replied to jacknorell | 3 years ago
0 likes

Cyclingtips had a podcast section on the wheels that suggested that they were initially developed as a tubeless set but Spesh were forced away from that route, marketing guff to the contrary aside. ETRTO guidelines, due to be updated soon, were posited as one possible reason.

Latest Comments