- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
34 comments
I agree with all you say, I just feel there has to be an underlying reason that is the foundation that validates some peoples' annoyance at the very site of someone on a bicycle.
Motorcyclists do not seem to get the same bad press for example.
That's a good observation. I'd suggest that motorcyclists are fairly rare (figures I can google suggest around about the cyclists making journeys mark - about 1% or so) so - like cyclists (outside of some culture war / media frenzy) - perhaps most people don't actually think about them much if at all?
Perhaps there is more parity with cars etc. - since "they pay tax" / "they have a licence". Two other "niggles" with cyclists aren't there - motorbikes don't tend to hold up cars (so not "in the way") and I don't recall motorcyclists filtering on the inside, more overtaking. Likely this feels safer on a motorbike than a bike.
On "conflict" - while it's true that drivers often fail to look for / see motorbikes ("Think bike!") I suspect they're slightly more visible than cyclists (mostly because lights). Also they're a bit more chunky - perhaps that cues "leave extra space". Maybe also less likely to mis-estimate their speed (non-cyclists seem pretty bad at doing so with cyclists)?
Motorbikes also come in different categories (also a bit like bikes). I think the opinions and media reactions are divided between these.
Full power machines appear to get a pass / respect. Presumably similar to cars e.g. "but licenced, insured, you paid a lot of money for one so that gives you some status etc." Maybe a certain regard for someone doing something "dangerous" dressed like a riot policeman?
Mopeds - definitely lower status (because seen as cheaper) but probably more acceptable again because "they pay tax" / "they have a licence". And of course lots of these folks are more obviously working!
Yoof on scrambler bikes (or stolen machines)? At least here in Edinburgh people have been injured and indeed at least one killed. Sometimes gets into the local news. The focus doesn't seem to be on the mode of transport so much though...
Motorcycling has changed a lot from being a cheap form of transport open to anyone into a high technology product mainly sold to middle aged men, excepting the delivery riders. Young people can afford cars so get pushed there by parental angst and conformity.
Electric scooters seem to fill the cheap transport niche of 50cc mopeds of old.
It is still seen as an indulgence that risks their lives for a very limited thrill which is often bordering on reckless, and they regularly ignore speed limits. Apart from that they are fine. I have enjoyed a few miles on the back of a friend's Kawasaki many years ago.
Pages