- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
forum
Why do people care so much about other people wearing helmets?
Every time helmets get mentioned a crowd of people come out frothing at the mouth to declare that they're a big boy who doesn't want to wear a helmet. Why is it such a touchy subject?
If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.
Latest Forum Topics
Latest Comments
- Aluminium can 11 min 44 sec ago
I remembered right after posting then figured no one would notice so didn't fix my post. They're used to it...
- hawkinspeter 6 hours 27 min ago
"Acting like", not necessarily "built like". However, I don't think leaf springs work under tension and instead require compression which isn't how...
- hawkinspeter 6 hours 32 min ago
Interesting theory - how many points does it take for them to drive carefully?
- eburtthebike 6 hours 55 min ago
At the end of the consultation in May 2025, a decision will be taken.........
- Grahamd 7 hours 19 min ago
The absurdity of it deepens when you realise that those points were acquired by the age of 26.
- David9694 8 hours 53 min ago
BAM!
- IanGlasgow 9 hours 29 min ago
"Polartec Power Shield RPM fabric – which has a 10,000mm hydro head to keep wet weather out, and an industry-leading breathability spec of 30,000g...
- mdavidford 10 hours 32 min ago
Oxfordshire councils are quite capable of letting you down too!...
- PenLaw 11 hours 38 min ago
I guess Morrissey could claim it.
- wtjs 12 hours 4 min ago
I do see a lot of delivery riders (on illegal e-motorbikes) with their faces covered...
Add new comment
93 comments
"Why do people care so much about other people wearing helmets?""
You got it the wrong way round.
Well, this is an interesting one. I remember being very against helmets as a teenager and thought that they were very uncool. UNTIL I got knocked off my bike on the South Circular in London in about 1990. I then wore a helmet every day after that... remember those helmets with fabric covers over the top? LOL I think this perception often stems back to our childhood.
Personally, I don't care what anyone else does or doesn't do, regarding helmet use. I use a helmet, because I found out ( the hard way ) what happens if you get brought down at a speed exceeding walking pace, with , and then without a decent lid ( long story ). It's personal choice, until the law is changed ( I can't see that happening ).
Dear road.cc admins
Please can you give Martin73 and Rendel Harris their own forum to play in?
Thanks!
I apologise for getting somewhat swept up in the trolling, unfortunately when somebody throws my name into a discussion for no purpose whatsoever and then attempts to make spiteful and untrue comments about my relationship with my wife I am not of a nature to take that lying down.
No need to apologise, I don't know how you put up with it. It's tiresome.
You know, that's happened before with a user who was definitely a different person behind the keyboard, hasn't it...?
I prefer to take it lying down - less strain on the knees and circulatory systems.
But then I do ride a recumbent sometimes.
We can follow the idea of Ship of Fools and call it "Hell".
I did suggest something like that last year - they have a section for dead horses where you can flog them.
Or better yet, implemet the user profile/post history/ignore list functionality we've been asking for forever, so we can just not see posts from the people with nothing constructive to add, who only come here to stir shit. Seriousy Admins, do want me to code it for you?
so we can just not see posts from the people with nothing constructive to add that only come here to stir shit
I suppose this would make things marginally easier, but it really is simple to ignore comments from the usual, very obvious suspects and comments responding to them, and topics initiated by them!
Already possible with ublock origin. My list is quite long now.
Sorry I'm somewhat new to the comments and forum. Can someone explain to me who they are and what they've done wrong? I can see a lot of angry comments but I don't have a context.
Sure Jan
But any child knows this.
You've made my day brooksby !
Please?! There has to be another bridge on the internet?
...
I am interested by the post title, but far less interested in the subtutle context.
Why do people care so much about other people wearing helmets?
1. Motorists
For motorists, I think its because a cyclist wearing a helmet dilutes the level of responsibility a driver feels for that cyclist. 'It's OK if I should knock him off as he won't be killed because... helmets'
Likewise, cyclists not wearing a helmet is grating for many motorists as they perceive the cyclist to be not taking responsibility for their safety and therefore the motorist has to assume full responsibility for their own actions; 'stupid cyclist, I could kill him if I knock him off'
If you have an opportunity, stop and think about how twisted that logic is!
2. Helmet Wearing Cyclists
Let's be honest, in an ideal world none of us would wear cycling helmets. By that I mean we wouldn't feel the sport was dangerous, our riding skills aren't going to let us down at any minute and our bikes aren't going to suddenly fail. Helmets wouldn't be 'needed'.
Alas that's not the case... or maybe, just maybe it is? Nearly everytime we ride, we don't fall off. Our bikes don't fail, everything goes swimmingly. Perhaps cycling isn't this wild ride, avoiding certain death at every turn, that we are told it is.
When wearing helmets, many feel it is the right thing to do, indeed the only thing to do. Therefore when they see a cyclist without a helmet on, cycling, living, thriving, it challenges their viewpoint.
Cycling evangelists aren't passionate about saving non-helmet wearers from certain death, they simply want to stop people challenging their personal beliefs.
3 Non-cycling others
Cycling makes sense on so many levels; its healthy, convenient, liberating and even fun. So why do so many people still not do it? Because they can't be bothered.
To these people, the helmet is a perfect talisman for why cycling is bad and enables them to continue ignoring common sense and the bicycle. A helmet represents danger... cycling is dangerous; it represents discomfort and inconvenience... it'll ruin my hair, where do I keep my helmet when I'm out?; it represents stupidity... cycling and cyclists look naff.
Much like helmet wearing evangelists, when seeing a cyclist without a helmet, it challenges their viewpoint. They want cyclists to wear helmets so that they can continue to justify not cycling.
Flipping that around, why are non helmet wearers so passionate about refuting pro-helmet adoption? Its because helmets compromise our safety in traffic, they perpetuate a false narrative around cycling dangers, and they put non-cyclists off cycling.
Thread created by a wind-up merchant - although there have been some thoughtful rejoinders this was always unlikely to be a profitable exercise!
Also, if I have to wear a seatbelt, you should have to wear a helmet
Which seems to be the basis of so many of motorists' gripes about cyclists - I have to do x, so you should have to do x or something a bit like it. No recognition that a car and a bike are rather different things.
[/quote]
Also, if I have to wear a seatbelt, you should have to wear a helmet
[/quote]
Except you are statistically more likely to bang your head behind the steering wheel of your car than on your pushbike...so you should wear a seatbelt AND helmet when driving...
Also, if I have to wear a seatbelt, you should have to wear a helmet
[/quote]
Except you are statistically more likely to bang your head behind the steering wheel of your car than on your pushbike...so you should wear a seatbelt AND helmet when driving...
[/quote]
I don't think that's true. Statistics have been posted on this thread already that show that cycling has a much higher rate of head injury per distance travelled than a car.
Except you are statistically more likely to bang your head behind the steering wheel of your car than on your pushbike...so you should wear a seatbelt AND helmet when driving...
[/quote] I don't think that's true. Statistics have been posted on this thread already that show that cycling has a much higher rate of head injury per distance travelled than a car.[/quote]Injuries per distance travelled is meaningless metric (especially comparing motorvehicles to bicycles), people don't lives their lives by distance, except Dominic Turetto.
I don't think that's true. Statistics have been posted on this thread already that show that cycling has a much higher rate of head injury per distance travelled than a car.[/quote]Injuries per distance travelled is meaningless metric (especially comparing motorvehicles to bicycles), people don't lives their lives by distance, except Dominic Turetto.[/quote]
I don't have the numbers and frankly can't be bothered to look them up for the benefit of someone on the internet who made a claim without backing it up.
The figures quoted for car travel were so much lower that I would expect that even working by per time or even per trip, you'd still end up quids-in so to speak.
But like I said, I can't be bothered to check. Wycombe wheeler shared the study I think. Go look if you care enough.
PS turns out I can be bothered. By time, figures wereUsing time as the denominator, rates were "0.16 (0.14–0.19) [cycling] ,0.10 (0.10–0.11) [walking] and 0.03 (0.028–0.032) [driving] respectively in men and 0.10 (0.07–0.14), 0.04 (0.037–0.045), and 0.01 (0.012–0.016) respectively in women, per million hours travelled."
So yeah, way safer to drive from a head injury perspective.
It's almost like the more protection you have, the safer you are. Funny that.
You have this backwards. You either know this and ignore it, or are too dim to realise it. It is the group who thinks everyone should wear helmets that are the frothy-mouthed problem.
They just need to shut-up and let everyone make their own personal choice without spouting off about other people's freedom of choice. It really is that simple.
The question really is why is it such as touchy subject for the helmet evangalists, why can they not just mind their own business?
This kind of furious response what I was referring to
Pages