At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Advanced alliteration applied, Alexander!
It's on the Mavic website, 120kg inclusive of bike.
The 'no legal requirement' bit is inconsequential when it comes to contributory negligence; as bicycle specific helmets are readily available and...
Van Erp is more than an activist though; I have no issue with him filming, reporting and posting online, but he also engages in vigilante behaviour...
Clearly the randos tweeting have no clue cycling is a team sport.
Spin an aluminum wheel with your finger. Now spin a carbon wheel with your finger. The difference in inertia 'weight' your finger must overcome...
I own the Grand tour jacket and love it. Might get this for spring/summer. Thanks for the heads up road.cc
We should have a sweep on which PBU Tenpin is.
No idea. He just seems to be a rich, selfish, violent twat.
Fair point, but do the motoring reports ever have sections exclusively commented on by cyclists and pedestrians? No? So it's only when it's for...