- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Big Ben © Simon MacMichaelMail on Sunday slams MPs claiming cycling allowance of 20p a mile - we take a close look at the figures
The Mail on Sunday has today taken aim at “freewheeling, freeloading” MPs who claim 20 pence a mile when riding their bikes on official business. But road.cc has found that in 2012/13, just six MPs made claims for travelling by bike, totalling less than £150 – compared to almost 40,000 claims for motoring expenses, amounting to nearly £900,000.
According to the Mail on Sunday, MPs are “at the centre of a new expenses row,” even though the politicians are perfectly entitled to claim the allowance, which is in line with HMRC rules and reflect wear and tear and the cost of maintaining a bike such as having it serviced.
Among the MPs to have attracted its ire are transport minister, Robert Goodwill, and shadow transport secretary, Mary Creagh.
Based on figures obtained from the Independent Parliament Standards Authority (IPSA), the Mail on Sunday identified Hugh Bayley, the Labour MP for York Central, as having claimed the highest sums over the past four years - £205 in total.
That should, however, be put into the context of the £98.1 million in total expenses claimed by MPs in 2012/13 alone.
Much of that aggregate figure relates to office and staffing costs, but amounts reimbursed for motoring mileage dwarf those for cycling.
Our research found £146.60 was claimed by six MPs for cycling either by themselves or their staff in 2012/13, with 79 separate claims submitted.
In contrast, there were nearly 40,000 separate claims by MPs for use of their own car personally or by their staff, as well as for parking. The total? More than £880,000.
In the case of Oxford East Labour MP Andrew Smith, we discovered that the amount he claimed last year for cycling was £30.60, compared to motoring expenses of £2,469.
The largest amount claimed for a single cycling trip during the year was £4.56 by Leicester East MP, Liz Kendall.
Mr Goodwill, who made just one cycling-related claim last year, told the Mail on Sunday: “I just put in a few claims to demonstrate that I use my bicycle for work. I actually made ten journeys last Thursday for votes between the Department for Transport offices and Parliament and I didn’t claim for those.”
The amount he claimed for that trip in 2012/13? 80 pence.
Ms Creagh made two claims during the same year, for a total of £1.80. She declined to speak to the newspaper.
The suggestion from the Mail on Sunday seems to be that the MPs claiming expenses are somehow on the fiddle, although given the amounts involved some might wonder whether the return justifies the effort.
And while Liam Fox’s claim of 3 pence in motoring mileage for a 100-metre trip attracted derision last year, claims for motoring expenses don’t seem to be attracting quite the same scrutiny, despite the amount of money involved being 6,000 times higher.
Mr Bayley explained to the Mail on Sunday why he claimed. “I use it to maintain my bicycles and I’ve spent a lot more than £200,” he said.
“I have two bicycles, one in my constituency and the other in London. It costs about £60 a year to put each through an annual maintenance check.”
One MP, the Liberal Democrat Norman Lamb who represents North Norfolk, claimed a total of £12.50 for bicycle use over the last four years, but told the Mail on Sunday he no longer did so.
“I concluded, I’ve got a bike, it’s not costing me anything so I just don’t claim any more,” he explained.
“I certainly think we should be encouraging MPs to use the cheapest mode of transport but I have myself chosen to do it without claiming now.”
Last December, former cycling minister Norman Baker, now at the Home Office, tried to decline the use of a ministerial car, saying he would rather use a “ministerial bicycle.”But civil servants told him it would be an “unacceptable burden” on the taxpayer, despite the department spending £136,000 a year on ministerial cars.
Before the 2010 General Election, then leader of the opposition David Cameron pledged to reduce the bill for ministerial cars by £6 million if he became prime minister.
Mr Goodwill, who was shadow transport minister at the time, said: “Unless they have a good reason – such as carrying lots of ministerial boxes or security – we will expect Tory Ministers to consider using bicycles to get around Westminster and Whitehall.
“Ministers can always put their paperwork in a backpack.”
Note: We looked at data from IPSA for 2012/13 relating to expenses claimed for use of own car or bicycle by MPs or their staff, as well as data for car parking. Some expenses related to cycling or motoring may fall under other headings, but those are the main ones.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- NickJP 1 hour 8 min ago
The review says "tapered head tube", but the photos accompanying it clearly show that the head tube is not tapered.
- mark1a 3 hours 10 min ago
Well... as it happens, I have the Bosch EasyPump. I bought it a year ago with some Christmas gift money. Its main use is on my van which doesn't...
- eburtthebike 3 hours 59 min ago
"...as mayor aims to bring “credibility” to active travel initiatives...."...
- Simon E 6 hours 11 min ago
I do too. It's a 'real world' read fill of people doing real world riding instead of a glossy lightweight brochure for spenders and dreamers....
- FionaJJ 6 hours 56 min ago
Exactly. I won't lie, I did quite enjoy pointing out that the reason olive oil had got so much more expensive was because of the droughts in the...
- chrisonabike 10 hours 23 min ago
What about all the computer misuse? Stop with the downloading already!
- brooksby 10 hours 46 min ago
"Professional Triangle tire Punctured tire Nail for Spike Anti-Theft car Safety Emergency car" Sorry, but WHAT??
- HollisJ 12 hours 40 min ago
Have you seen the size of Micras these days? Now, it it were a Micra from the 80s...
Add new comment
42 comments
OI. Stop it you lot. I'm playing with the commentors and I keep getting upvoted!
Cycling is cheap but it isn't free either. HMRC let's you claim over 40p a mile for car journeys. That's not just for fuel but is supposed to represent the actual cost of driving. Depreciation, servicing, consumables etc.
HMRC needs a figure like that for cycling.
I agree with Paul M. I claim 20p per mile for a 10 mile each-way commute, for a total of about eighty quid a month. It's enough to cover wear and tear on parts, plus sundries like chain lube, but I do my own spannering and doubt it would cover the weekly drivetrain degrease/re-lube lube that is required during winter, were I to rely on a shop.
HMRC do have a cycle allowance, and it's 20p a mile tax-free and for an unlimited number of miles and has been for many years.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/travel.htm
It's got nothing to do with civil servants or MP's either, any employee of any company using their own bike for work journeys (not to get to work) can and should be able to claim.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/mileage/employee-factsheet.pdf
This was just typical Daily Mail garbage.
OK. 3 mile journey to a meeting.
Taxi - £12?
Tube - £3.20
Bike - 60p
Ministerial car - £100s
Which would that stupid rag of a newspaper prefer the MP charged? There is wear & tear on a bike.
I think MP's should be entitled to claim for underwear wear. It must be a huge financial burden; all that talking out of their arse must place a huge strain on these garments.
Ok folks, using my professional analysis skills I have carried out a detailed study of the 20p per mile allowance.
I can conclude beyond doubt that it is wholly appropriate.......providing the following assumptions are applied.
An MP is riding a bike worth at least £2500
-Of course they are, they have money to burn, most are known to buy a colnago c59 and use it for only a week before giving it away to some street urchin.
An MP is wearing top end rapha kit
-Of course, are you implying an MP would be seen in Aldi kit? Special edition pin stripe kit with triple enforced gusset is the only way.
An MP is unable to repair their own bike and must seek professional services.
-Of course, they are fucking useless at everything else, why would this not extend to simple bike maintenance.
An MP needs to replace brakes and tyres on a regular basis.
-of Course, they are all overweight rim bending chunksters who burn through brake blocks, wheels and vittoria tubs like they are going out of fashion
An MP is a finely tuned machine that requires optimum nutrition intake.
-Of course, swan and pheasant power bars don't grow on trees.
Agree with most of the above - you're allowed to claim mileage allowance to cover maintenance. I'd far rather they claimed bike allowance than car allowance.
Wonder if the smaller claims are simply made so that there's an audit trail "proving" that a cycle to work bike had indeed been used for cycling to work?
just in the interest of political balance the Mirror also carried this story.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mps-claim-expenses-cycling-work-324...
Of which the best one is this:
"they don't cycle fast enough to work up a sweat so how can they claim the same as someone with a car"
Eh?! Honestly, I ask you...
Moats don't fill themselves, we've got to take what we can these days.
It's the Mail on Sunday / Daily Mail. Poisonous idiocy. That's what they do. No point engaging with that lot.
No, idiocy is what I do, trolling them with common sense to see if I can get banned again!
Meanwhile, flowers bloom, people chat and cats meow.
The DM says its all death and despair.
And the things to get really angry about get ignored.
What a load of tosh.
Still I expect they have some pictures of Myleene Klass/Kelly Brook/whoever in their underwear/bikini by way of compensation for not being a newspaper.
There's clearly no intention for this to be "news". It's just propaganda designed to increase hatred towards two of society's scapegoat groups - politicians and cyclists...
One thing you'll notice about all the anti-cycling propaganda is how none of it is supported by any facts (road tax, 2-abreast, helmets, hi-vis, riding in the gutter etc)
The Daily Mail knows exactly what it's doing when it publishes stories like this. Sadly, there seem to be enough people who're gullible enough to take it in...
Although seeing so many people commuting this morning and out riding in the sunshine yesterday, I think they've backed the losing horse on this one...
I normally use asterisks, a spoonerism or a deliberate mis - spelling of the word but...
The Daily / Sunday Mail. What a bunch of cunts they are.
I would have thought the bigger "scandal" was the fact that some employers pay a premium mileage allowance for employees with larger engines
As reported here on 28/02 Leeds pay an additional £420K to employees by means of a 65p per mile allowance rather than a the HMRC standard 40p
To me this appears to be a tax free backdoor subsidy for employees who do a bit of travelling and feel a larger vehicle would massage their egos..no doubt kept in place as more management types benefit from the policy?
From this perspective paying someone 20p a mile to travel and the associated benefits for the employee and society seems a bargain
It's not tax-free, or at least if it is it means someone is breaking the law! The excess over the HMRC rates is taxable. The approved rate for car mileage is 45p/mile, so that means 20p per mile should be taxed.
I agree with the other posters. What is the problem here, and why is it news? If someone can claim back expenses for wear'n'tear on their car when they use their own car for business reasons, then why can't someone claim back expenses for wear'n'tear on their bike if they ride that for business?
The real scandal is that bikes got worn down by modern British urban streets far quicker than cars - perhaps we should be able to claim more for cycling for work, rather than less
I think the essential problem here is that the Mail cannot see that a bicycle is a valid mode of transport, or that it is anything other than a toy... hence their indignation. They cannot imagine that it wears down and gets repaired (just like a car), and in their mind, it's like someone claiming expenses for wear'n'tear on a teddy bear.
Toilet paper in non-story shocker.
Personally I think we should pay people to cycle to work. The opposite of charging them to drive, if you like.
WOW @ the articles comment section
NEVER read the comments. Perfect way to ensure brain damage.
They just reaffirm my view that there are a *lot* of morons in this world...
I'm not going to sink to giving the Volkischer Beobachter its clickbait so I won't see the comments but I can guess.
However it is not just the Mail carrying this story - it was in the Sunday Mirror as well. the relatively few comments that had been left by yesterday morning when I was looking at the article online suggested that readers were saying "£146? So what is your point?" I was tempted to comment on journalists' legendary propensity for dodgy expense claims but frankly I have better things to do with my time.
Do we have any comment from The Daily Fail as to how much their reporter(s) claimed in expenses to write this drivel?
Why should they be allowed to claim for anything ? I expect the vast majority of people aren't allowed to claim for anything in their jobs. But i digress.
The mail seems to be inundated with reporters at the top of their field providing the public with a detailed unbiased account of ongoing stoires throughout the uk and the world
I claim expenses when I travel for work. I don't see why I shouldn't, and so I don't see why MPs shouldn't either (within reason of course).
Bikes have wear and tear same as cars, so why not?
Sorry Stumps, I disagree on this. If an employee needs to visit other premises (that are not classified as their base location), then they are entitled to claim mileage in the same way. As much as the MP expenses thing does appear to be just a massive bonus scheme, the mileage amounts are the HMRC values.
That said, I'm self-employed and could claim for my 7-mile-each-way run to the office, but I don't bother when on the bike, or (rarely) in the car. Basically it's a fair bit of admin for small beans in return.
As for the mail, this story is like arguing about the formation of deck chairs on the deck of the titanic...
Pages