- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Justice (Lonpicman, Wikimedia Commons)Milkman who carried on round after leaving cyclist with brain injuries guilty of careless driving
A milkman who carried on with his round after his milk float hit a cyclist, leaving him in a coma for six months and with permanent brain injuries meaning he has to receive round-the-clock care, has been found guilty of careless driving. But a jury acquitted him of the greater offence of causing serious injury through dangerous driving.
Preston Crown Court heard that David Reid, aged 71 and from Barrow, Cumbria, told a 15-year-old boy who was travelling with him on his milk float, “I think he’s dead,” after he stopped to check on the cyclist, 36-year-old Paul Reynolds, a submariner stationed in the town, reports the Liverpool Echo.
Despite his vehicle’s windscreen being smashed, Reid, who did not have a mobile phone, continued to make deliveries for half an hour, stopping at a post office to call for help. He then returned to the scene in his car where police, who had been alerted by a passing motorist, arrested him.
The incident happened at around 6.15am on 27 February 2013 on Bank Lane in Barrow, which Reid said was unlit and “like looking down a black hole.” The court was told that Mr Reynolds’ bike did not have lights and that he was not wearing reflective clothing.
According to prosecuting counsel Brian McKenna, “The prosecution say that the way that this accident occurred was that at all times Mr Reid’s vehicle was on the wrong side of the road. They were not going very fast, certainly no more than 20mph.”
The driver however, who has been a milkman for more than 50 years and had an unblemished driving record, maintained that he was driving carefully, that he was making a right turn and that his speed was lower.
He said: “There was a whoosh across the front of my screen. I didn’t know what it was. I heard a bang.
“I was in the middle of the carriageway, probably one wheel over the white line as I started to turn. The van was completely illuminated.
“While trying to make the turn I was doing about eight miles an hour.”
The 15-year-old accompanying Reid told the court: “Dave got out to see if he was all right, he said hello to him and he came back and said to me ‘I think he’s dead’.
“He kept saying ‘What do I do?’ and then he went ‘Cyclists, they are dangerous on the road – they do not pay attention.’ ”
Mr Reynolds was thrown several metres onto a grass verge as a result of the collision and Reid recalled: “I said to him ‘can you hear me?’ a few times. There was no response. He was just lying there.
“I didn’t dare touch him. I went back to the van and as I did that I looked around to see if any house lights were on. There was only one about twenty yards away, but it only had a sort of landing light.”
He was unable to explain why he had carried on with his milk round, saying that the incident had left him in a “confused” state of mind, adding, “It isn’t in my nature at all to be callous.”
Reid is due to be sentenced on 4 August, although Judge Graham Knowles has told him not to expect a custodial sentence.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- JoanneH 1 sec ago
What a shame that the Evening Standard's coverage leads with 'lycra lout'. I'd lay a bet that a high proportion of the red-light jumpers were not...
- Backladder 3 min 7 sec ago
Confusingly there seem to be two Millicent roads which cross at approximately right angles, the one that is north-east to south-west is the one...
- Owd Big 'Ead 12 min 35 sec ago
Indeed....
- brooksby 16 min 18 sec ago
I presume that garda will be sacked shortly for showing up all of their colleagues?
- mark1a 52 min 47 sec ago
Haha! Not quite, don't go giving me ideas now!
- sheridan 1 hour 36 min ago
Your point being? That old lane (now closed off as is obvious in the link you posted) was built thirty five years ago or more. On the other side...
- SaveTheWail 2 hours 14 min ago
"Although other neighbours were outside, nobody else had thought to alert her mum and siblings because there was no car on the drive so they didn’t...
- Tech Noir 2 hours 50 min ago
"Aldi apologised for the blocked bike racks and said "we have spoken with the store to make sure that the cycle bays are clear for use at all times...
- essexian 3 hours 26 min ago
Interesting..... but perhaps I'll wait for the LIdl or Aldi copy and save a couple of hundred quid.....
- marmotte27 4 min 6 sec ago
The change in running shoes has come in the last five years or so, the TdF analysis goes until 2010, so before, as I pointed out above....
Add new comment
24 comments
Sunrise in Cumbria at that date was 7:07 according to the chart I looked at, and we know how dark it is 50 minutes before sunrise, especially if it's overcast.
The driver is plainly guilty of leaving the scene though.
Maybe I'm reading this differently to you all...
he hit someone - suffered massive shock from what he had done (hence carrying on with his round for 30 minutes), called from a post office as soon as he could - remember he didn't have a phone as was in shock, and then returned to the scene of the crime as soon as he could in his car.
stupid? yes
callous? no, I don't think so, just an old guy who had just witnessed a massive trauma and didn't cope particularly well with it.
there's precisely no condoning what he did that caused the incident, but I think some cooling down needs to be done on the actions afterwards!
Either too stupid to know he should immediately fetch help, or too callous to care. Either way, unfit ever to be let in charge of a motor vehicle ever again.
Sorry, with people getting killed left and right I obviously got things mixed up. Doesn't change the fact that the law considers property to be of higher value than a human life.
.
In cases of serious injury, getting expert care within the first hour is critical.
"thrown several meters" .. the guy was going much more than 8 mph. And it doesn't sound like the cyclist can give his version of it, can he.
This really is through-the-looking-glass justice.
There was a geyser on the 'box last night who got six years for forging an oil-painting. This scum gets acquitted for killing a boy and callously leaving him there.
That's an easy one. The boy wasn't property. Someone's life isn't worth nearly as much as someone else's money. Can't say I'm surprised. Disgusted, yes. But not surprised.
For both your future reference, it may be worth reading articles prior to commenting on them. The boy was not the injured party, but was travelling in the vehicle. The injured party was 36 years old, so either you didn't read the article or are both really, really, really old!
I'm just completely baffled as to why abandoning the victim would not warrant a custodial sentence.
The principal of the law is to protect, the behaviour of the accused on just that point of abandonment, regardless of the accident, could have caused a death.
I think this is a case where I might look closely at the ruling when it eventually appears.
I'd be curious as to what sort of judgement a lorry driver would get for similar behaviour towards a small car. Do we shrug our shoulders and say, meh, he didn't take care if a smaller 4 wheeled vehicle gets in a crash? it might have been their fault but it doesn't change the fact that two people left another human being to die.
There's something not right about the whole thing.
Leaving someone for dead. I'm staggered. How inhumane can some people be?
If he got confused by what to do after an rta and he almost killed someone he shouldn't be driving, his licence should be revoked. Minimum.
Is the claim 'without lights' being made by the driver of the milk float? or based on clear evidence. That might include the fact that 30 minutes could easily mean battery light condition at the time the Police collected evidence would be indeterminable for the time of the crash, and some lights carried on the cyclist/bike might have detached?
There is 'leaving the scene' and 'failing to provide details'
Cumbria (ie in the North) and just before clocks change. Could easily be getting light by about that time
Isn't leaving the scene of an accident in which you, as a motorist, are involved, and where the victim has been deliberately left for dead (regardless of blame), in itself some sort of serious crime?
It depends - if his intention had been to immediately summon assistance, then no
However taking half an hour, delivering milk on the way etc. - it shows a clear disregard for human life
I would have been hammering on the door of the nearest house showing any lights
point one being, no lights at 6-15am ....in February?
Point two van on the wrong side of the road
Point three....being left to die ??? Couldn't he have left the young lad with cyclist and drive to the nearest phone box/ shop/ house with lights on to call an ambulance?
One and three are not an accident.
"Cyclists are dangerous on the road - they don't pay attention"
WTF !!!!!!!!
Surely leaving a dead/dying person is more of a crime than careless driving?
The milkman is seriously at fault here - and the whole mobile phone thing is a red herring - if he was bothered he should have gone straight to where he could call for help - not deliver milk on the way
But what on earth was a cyclist doing on the road at 6.15am in February without lights?
I think this is a case where some blame at least must accrue to the cyclist
Agreed. A terrible outcome for this guy and his family, but wtf was he doing on the road in the dark with no lights or reflectives on !! I've had dumbass cyclists suddenly appear out of nowhere on dark nights completely invisible till the last second, not having any lights or light clothing on. There's definitely a Darwinian factor at work here !
Sounds like the old boy went on to some sort of traumatic shock after the accident
Ps. I'm the guy commuting to work in Cornwall , lit up like a Christmas tree. Stay safe out there, they are out to get us !
At the time of the accident - 6.15am - it would have been civil twilight, which started at 06:12:14, with sunrise at 06:46:16. Lighting conditions would have been "sufficient, under good weather conditions, for terrestrial objects to be clearly distinguished". The law requires bike lights and shiny things between sunset and sunrise.
Careless rather than dangerous sounds about right tbh. Props for Christmas tree riding.
Anyone know a 15 year old that isn't permenantly attached to their mobile phone? something about this doesn't ring true!