Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Sustrans demonstrates ‘street kit’ for trialling changes in street layout

Interlocking design is based on a bike chain

Sustrans has launched a flexible, modular ‘street kit’ which the charity hopes will help communities test different street layouts. Inspired by the construction of a bike chain, the kit comprises interlocking plastic seating which can be laid out in different ways to create temporary public spaces.  

Sustrans says that the kit can be used to trial new layouts, such as the inclusion of wider kerbs at junctions to slow traffic, or to try and reduce through traffic on residential roads to make the environment more inviting to cyclists and pedestrians. At the London launch this week, it was used to reclaim parking bays.

The kit comprises hollow plastic units which can be linked together. As links are hollow, they are light and easy to carry from place to place, but once in position they can be filled with water to make them more stable. They can also be finished with reflective stickers so they can be seen at night.

Peter Murray, Chairman of New London Architecture said:

“I’m a great fan of the idea of using temporary installations to try out whether we can change the way we use streets. The great thing about the Sustrans street kit is that it's adaptable - if people like the new setup they can keep it, if they don’t like it they can change it.

“There are literally hundreds of streets across London that could be improved by having somewhere to sit with improved landscaping and calmed traffic. There are a lot of changes currently taking place on streets around London, it fits in well with the sorts of changes happening in the ‘Mini Holland’ projects in Walthamstow and Kingston.”

Matt Winfield, Deputy Director of Sustrans London said that the kit had been designed after seeing the success of similar experiments in San Francisco and Portland where semi-permanent installations had helped change the way people thought about roads and public space.

Pointing out that streets make up 80 per cent of the accessible open space in our towns and cities, Winfield said: “I hope that from the confidence gained through testing street redesigns with our street kit, communities and local authorities will be able to make permanent changes to our towns and cities to create better places for people.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
the little onion | 8 years ago
0 likes

Sustrans - the quislings of the cycling world, for the reasons discussed above. They do more harm than good, and are more like an undercover branch of a pro-motoring organisation

Anyway, I quite like this idea as either a way of testing out designs for proper cycling infrastructure, or as a way of creating temporary infrastructure to deal with temporary events (e.g. to deal with road closures etc).

Avatar
mrmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

If a driver looks at the cycle path and asks why aren't cyclists using it, (because it is crap, covered in glass, goes the wrong way, etc etc) what has been achieved?

If your going to spend money, then spend it on providing paths that work, spending money of the sake of spending money does nothing to help anyone.

Avatar
crikey | 8 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

This is a brilliant idea and could potentially shift the car-centric viewpoint that society has had for several decades

Professor Jim Royle, earlier today; "My Arse".

Avatar
joules1975 replied to crikey | 8 years ago
0 likes
crikey wrote:
Quote:

This is a brilliant idea and could potentially shift the car-centric viewpoint that society has had for several decades

Professor Jim Royle, earlier today; "My Arse".

I am always surprised by the huge negativity on this site towards anything that might help the cycling and active travel cause or improve our living space, plus the scale of the negativity towards Sustrans. Just cause they don't build things that suit you (presumably an experienced cyclist that rides at speed and is comfortable with and confident about riding on the roads), does not mean that what they do is pointless and stupid.

What are you doing to help change things (apart from riding your bike)?

Avatar
teaboy replied to joules1975 | 8 years ago
0 likes
joules1975 wrote:
crikey wrote:
Quote:

This is a brilliant idea and could potentially shift the car-centric viewpoint that society has had for several decades

Professor Jim Royle, earlier today; "My Arse".

I am always surprised by the huge negativity on this site towards anything that might help the cycling and active travel cause or improve our living space, plus the scale of the negativity towards Sustrans. Just cause they don't build things that suit you (presumably an experienced cyclist that rides at speed and is comfortable with and confident about riding on the roads), does not mean that what they do is pointless and stupid.

Actually, it sort of does. Cycling needs to be for ALL. Infrastructure needs to cater for everyone, not just the slow and timid. Why should I be put in danger because I'm "an experienced cyclist that rides at speed and is comfortable with and confident about riding on the roads"? Sustrans are the people who are rubber-stamping 'cycle routes' on which you are not allowed or able to cycle. They are the ones installing barriers to prevent cycling on bike paths, effectively banning anyone with a non-standard bike (or wheelchair).

This 'initiative' isn't new, and doesn't require fancy 'clip together' plastic seating. Just political will.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to joules1975 | 8 years ago
0 likes
joules1975 wrote:

I am always surprised by the huge negativity on this site towards anything that might help the cycling and active travel cause or improve our living space, plus the scale of the negativity towards Sustrans. Just cause they don't build things that suit you (presumably an experienced cyclist that rides at speed and is comfortable with and confident about riding on the roads), does not mean that what they do is pointless and stupid.

What are you doing to help change things (apart from riding your bike)?

The thing in the news item itself does strike me as a marginally interesting gimmick - I just bet it will have no noticable effect on the world, and certainly not on my life. On the other hand, I'm sure it doesn't cost much either, so it doesn't much matter.

The main thing is I just think your comment has it back-to-front.

I don't fit your parenthetical description. I am not at all comfortable or confident about riding on the roads as they are, I frankly greatly dislike it (I'm not very fast either) but have to do it as its my only way to get anywhere in reasonable time.

I just find Sustrans does very little for me. It seems they mostly build low-quality, obstructed, shared and not-very-useful leisure routes in places I mostly don't want to go, and which are so awkward that I might as well go back to walking (as I used to). Leaving me stuck on those roads I dislike.

Were I an experienced cyclist of the type you describe I'd probably be fine with Sustrans, because I wouldn't need them to do anything for me. Its precisely because I'm not the type you describe that I find annoying that Sustrans don't do much that is useful.

I mean, I dare say they do have a function, but it doesn't seem to be one that is relevant to me. Why is that their name? What do they do for _sustainable transport_?

As for what am I doing - well give me Sustrans' budget and I'll have a go!

(OK, I can't absolutely promise I won't just blow it all on a round-the world holiday trip and a nice big house, but I might have enough left to pay for a good segregated cycle route on at least one nasty A road - probably the one leading to my new luxury abode).

Avatar
joules1975 replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 8 years ago
0 likes
FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
joules1975 wrote:

I am always surprised by the huge negativity on this site towards anything that might help the cycling and active travel cause or improve our living space, plus the scale of the negativity towards Sustrans. Just cause they don't build things that suit you (presumably an experienced cyclist that rides at speed and is comfortable with and confident about riding on the roads), does not mean that what they do is pointless and stupid.

What are you doing to help change things (apart from riding your bike)?

The thing in the news item itself does strike me as a marginally interesting gimmick - I just bet it will have no noticable effect on the world, and certainly not on my life. On the other hand, I'm sure it doesn't cost much either, so it doesn't much matter.

The main thing is I just think your comment has it back-to-front.

I don't fit your parenthetical description. I am not at all comfortable or confident about riding on the roads as they are, I frankly greatly dislike it (I'm not very fast either) but have to do it as its my only way to get anywhere in reasonable time.

I just find Sustrans does very little for me. It seems they mostly build low-quality, obstructed, shared and not-very-useful leisure routes in places I mostly don't want to go, and which are so awkward that I might as well go back to walking (as I used to). Leaving me stuck on those roads I dislike.

Were I an experienced cyclist of the type you describe I'd probably be fine with Sustrans, because I wouldn't need them to do anything for me. Its precisely because I'm not the type you describe that I find annoying that Sustrans don't do much that is useful.

I mean, I dare say they do have a function, but it doesn't seem to be one that is relevant to me. Why is that their name? What do they do for _sustainable transport_?

As for what am I doing - well give me Sustrans' budget and I'll have a go!

(OK, I can't absolutely promise I won't just blow it all on a round-the world holiday trip and a nice big house, but I might have enough left to pay for a good segregated cycle route on at least one nasty A road - probably the one leading to my new luxury abode).

I take your points and understand your frustration, however if Sustrans could do exactly what they wanted, then the routes created would be brilliant, without obstruction and would have right of way at crossings. Unfortunately Sustrans cannot do what they want because they often have to work in partnership (due to funding streams) and all routes need planning permission. As a result, Sustrans approach is to compromise to get the best they can get under the particular circumstances - i.e. something is better than nothing, even if that something isn't ideal.

Also, a big part of what Sustrans now do has little to do building routes. They are now heavily involved with 'Soft Measures' where its about promotion and assistance to businesses, schools and people as it is about building anything.

Finally, Sustrans big mistake (but maybe at the time the only way to get it's purpose promoted and funded) was to brand up the 'National Cycle Network' as a Sustrans project. It is, sort of, but it's mostly local routes created by local authorities etc that are then signposted and mapped into a network.

I too find Sustrans routes for the most part pointless for me personally, but they definitely have their place for people who will not go near a road (at least not initially). Other things they do though I think are very positive and pro-active (particularly their involvement with schools).

Avatar
teaboy replied to joules1975 | 8 years ago
0 likes
joules1975 wrote:

I take your points and understand your frustration, however if Sustrans could do exactly what they wanted, then the routes created would be brilliant, without obstruction and would have right of way at crossings. Unfortunately Sustrans cannot do what they want because they often have to work in partnership (due to funding streams) and all routes need planning permission. As a result, Sustrans approach is to compromise to get the best they can get under the particular circumstances - i.e. something is better than nothing, even if that something isn't ideal.

Also, a big part of what Sustrans now do has little to do building routes. They are now heavily involved with 'Soft Measures' where its about promotion and assistance to businesses, schools and people as it is about building anything.

Finally, Sustrans big mistake (but maybe at the time the only way to get it's purpose promoted and funded) was to brand up the 'National Cycle Network' as a Sustrans project. It is, sort of, but it's mostly local routes created by local authorities etc that are then signposted and mapped into a network.

I too find Sustrans routes for the most part pointless for me personally, but they definitely have their place for people who will not go near a road (at least not initially). Other things they do though I think are very positive and pro-active (particularly their involvement with schools).

Something is not always 'better than nothing' if the something is not actually usable. It's simply wasted money that could and should be spent on something that actually helps people. When the cycle infrastructure is so crap that people won't use it, non-'cyclists' will use this as a reason to not invest. "What's the point - people don't want to use the cycle paths anyway".

As we well know there's very little point in telling people that cycling is really safe and enjoyable when the route from home to work/school/shops in on a duel carriageway. Promotion does not change the fact that people can see what the environment has to offer and conclude that a couple of blue signs does not make a safe, enjoyable, direct route. Soft measures has never prevented conflict on the road anywhere in the world.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to crikey | 8 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Professor Jim Royle, earlier today; "My Arse".

It would be worth thinking about this positive idea, and testing it out in practice, rather than dismissing it in a cynical way.

Avatar
hampstead_bandit | 8 years ago
0 likes

This is a brilliant idea and could potentially shift the car-centric viewpoint that society has had for several decades, by providing a "working" test to show that streets can be reclaimed, or calmed for the benefit of residents and people travelling about under their own effort, rather than in a combustion engine'd metal box

Avatar
bikebot | 8 years ago
0 likes

Nothing new, motorists have been improvising temporary parking spaces for years.

Latest Comments