A member of the French senate is calling for cycle helmets to be made compulsory, something he insists will improve the safety of people on bikes.
Hervé Maurey, senator for the Eure department in Normandy, said that even minor incidents can have serious effects for cyclists, reports France Bleu.
But his opinion that cycle helmets should be mandatory has been criticised on social media as an attack on personal freedom.
While more people are taking to two wheels, the Nouveau Centre politician insisted that “cyclists without protection remain very vulnerable” and that “even minor incidents can have major consequences.”
In the department he represents, there were 35 deaths in road traffic incidents, and in only one of those was the victim a cyclist, notes France Bleu.
In France as a whole, 159 cyclists were killed in road traffic incidents during 2014, an increase of 8.2 per cent on the previous year.
Twitter user Grostaquin asked Maurey: “So when will helmets be compulsory for pedestrians? Enough of your Draconian laws – it’s too much.”
And 65-year-old Rouen resident Patrick, who exclusively uses a bike to get around, said he didn’t see the need for a helmet.
“I see no use in wearing a helmet when you pay attention to the traffic,” he told France Bleu.
Currently, only Australia and New Zealand have national compulsory cycle helmet laws applying to all riders, although similar legislation is found in some US states and Canadian provinces.
As we reported earlier this week, the Australian Capital Territory is to consult on relaxing mandatory helmet laws but only in certain low-risk environments such as parks or university campuses.
>> Australia’s capital could relax compulsory helmet law
http://road.cc/content/news/178989-australia%E2%80%99s-capital-could-rel...
The centre-right Nouveau Centre party that Maurey represents currently has just 12 of the 348 seats in the Senate, and only 12 of the 577 in the French parliament’s lower house, the Assemblée Nationale.
Add new comment
6 comments
The Melbourne city bike programme has been a failure due to compulsory helmet laws. Every single day money is being lost because if people want to use the city bikes, they have to bring a helmet around with them AT ALL TIMES. Cycling has been the number 1 mode of transport for the Dutch since the late 1970s and yet they still have NO mandatory helmet laws for adults (as far as I'm aware children under a certain age do have to wear a helmet).
Not so much politician making comment to mask bad infrastructure but more likely bad politician making comment to gain headlines and PR
I hereby refrain from adding a comment to this thread.
.
.
Doh!
No need to generate clickbait when some dumb politician mouths off every week.
Can we just cut to the chase: Helmets can be beneficial in some accidents, but not all. And complusion is a bad thing. Feel free to waste you time trying to argue against the (quite sensible) status quo if you want.
Nice try Leviathan- I applaud your efforts, but I fear the temptation will just be too much for some people . I tried on one previous occasion to pre-empt the usual stuff in a thread back in September but it still ended up full of the same predictable content repeated ad nauseum. It might just be a time saver to generate a numbered list of all the stock phrases linked to the helmet debate, and instead of people causing themselves RSI typing the same thing again and again, they can simply include the number of the comment they were going to make ( 1= anecdote about how a helmet saved someone's life, 2= University of Bath study, 3= getting cross at non-existent comments in the thread agreeing with compulsion etc etc...)
Although c'mon Road.cc - the road racing season is back on- at least save the helmet (and hi vis and disc brake) stuff for after October- it is now the anonymous doping detectives turn to roll out their schtick again.
Helmet debate, here we go again...