The government has come under attack from cycling campaigners this Easter weekend over the lack of money provided to implement the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS) – but a key document released prior to the Bank Holiday gave a hint of what was to come, with just one mention of people on bike, or on foot for that matter, in its 113 pages.
The document in question is the National Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2016-2021, which according to HM Treasury “brings together all of the government’s infrastructure priorities over the next five years.”
It also incorporates the National Infrastructure Pipeline, which outlines a planned investment of £450 billion during that period and beyond in “over 600 major projects and programmes across the UK,” as well as “£58 billion of public investment for housing and regeneration, education, health and justice.”
Included in those figures are £15 billion earmarked for building or improving major roads in England, and national cyclists’ charity CTC urged at the weekend that more of that money should be earmarked for cycling, with Highways England having outlined earlier this year its £100 million plan to “cycle proof” the Strategic Road Network.
> Highways England's Cycling Strategy short on detail and funds
CTC, which lobbied successfully along with others for the inclusion the CWIS in last year’s Infrastructure Act, said at the weekend that the planned £300 million spend on cycling in England at the weekend meant that “English cycle use would eventually reach Dutch levels by the start of the 23rd century, while its funding allocations mean even slower progress.”
> Government’s cycling strategy falls flat without funding
British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman said that the CWIS, which has entered an eight-week consultation, “won’t be worth the paper it’s written on” and accused Prime Minsiter David Cameron of “reneging on the ‘cycling revolution’ he promised us three years ago.”
He added: “If the government won’t commit to £10 per head every year, this strategy is stalling before it’s even got started.”
To save you from wading through the 113 pages of the National Infrastructure Plan to find that reference to cycling, we’ve done it for you.
On page 28, setting out the eight key objectives of Highways England during ‘Road Period 1’ – that’s from 2015 to 2020 – it lists one of those as “helping cyclists, pedestrians and other vulnerable users of the SRN [Strategic Roads Network].”
But with planned spending on cycling in England, other than London, standing at £1.39 per person per year, compared to the minimum £10 campaigners have called for, not with bundles of cash, it seems.
"I actually agree with the request. Imagine closing the M25 for a day for those that are willing to pay to drive round for a few hours."...
Thanks for sharing, I live in Timperley so the problem for me is the lack of cycling infrastructure from Altrincham to where it starts around Old...
Is it better to have flimsy head protection when a truck rolls over your head, or to have no protection and avoid the accident?...
Biologically its not quite that simple, but the large majority of people are at birth chromosomally and morphologically either female or male, and...
Yeah, that peak looks reall… oh wait, you didn't bother adding a picture of the helmet with the lauded peak attached. Or the peak itself. Or anyone...
Geraint rode a fantastic TT, there was nothing else he could have done. Roglic was just on another level to everyone else that day. He just had ...
Potato potaatoe. Sounds like you'll use any trivial point to avoid facing up to the fact that the world and sport is a complicated place.
So are you for or against inclusion of people into categories into which a subset have an innate sex-based performance benefit then?
A pathetic fine for a recidivist road criminal.