Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cycling UK cautiously optimistic that government review of motoring offences and penalties will begin before end of year

New legislation to be brought before parliament in 2017

The government has confirmed that there will be a review looking specifically at motoring offences and penalties later this year. Cycling UK has been told that a public consultation will begin before Christmas with the plan being to bring legislation before parliament in 2017.

A full review of all driving offences and penalties was first announced by then Justice Secretary Chris Grayling in 2014.

In September 2015, the review was said to be underway with Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Andrew Selous, saying he hoped that it would move to a public phase ‘soon’.

However, Selous subsequently said that sentencing in such cases would be considered under a wider consultation of all criminal offences to begin by the end of the year.

Cycling UK wrote to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) following the appointment of Elizabeth Truss as Justice Secretary in July and then met with officials last Friday. They have learned that the review will in fact specifically focus on the most serious offences involving injury or death to other road users after all.

Writing on the Cycling UK website, the organisation’s Road Safety and Legal Campaigns Officer, Duncan Dollimore, said:

“We have long campaigned for a review of the legislation concerning dangerous and careless driving, as changes are needed to avoid the current inconsistencies in charging decisions and how standards of poor driving are assessed and dealt with. We are delighted that this will be a key part of the promised review, which we have reliably been informed will also consider issues concerning sentencing and driving disqualification in such cases.”

Dollimore did however express disappointment that the MOJ do not propose to review the use of disqualification for non-imprisonable offences, nor the ‘exceptional hardship’ legislation by which drivers can avoid losing their driving licences despite having acquired 12 or more penalty points.

The latter was recently used by Christopher Gard, a driver who retained his licence despite eight previous convictions for using his phone at the wheel. Six weeks after the case, Gard hit and killed cyclist Lee Martin while reading a text message.

Dollimore said of the issue: “The distinction between what is truly exceptional, and the forseeable inconvenience which follows the loss of a licence for repeat offending is constantly blurred by the courts, and needs to be urgently reviewed.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

7 comments

Avatar
Must be Mad | 7 years ago
0 likes

People never think about the penalties - only the likihood of being caught

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
1 like

It'll be half-arsed and that'll be the end of it for a decade or two. 

Avatar
thx1138 replied to tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
1 like

unconstituted wrote:

It'll be half-arsed and that'll be the end of it for a decade or two. 

Agreed. The recent mobile phone use fine increases announed have done nothing to curb that. If there aren't police on the streets to enforce it people will continue to ignore the rules of the road. 

Avatar
Matt_S replied to thx1138 | 7 years ago
1 like

Quote:

Cycling UK cautiously optimistic that government review of motoring offences and penalties will begin before end of years to enforce it people will continue to ignore the rules of the road. 

And I'm optimistic that the 40 grand I wired to that Nigerian Prince is going to result in a handsome return on investment.

Avatar
Housecathst | 7 years ago
1 like

And the likelyhood of getting a conviction out of a jury of fellow motorists...... 

Avatar
jollygoodvelo replied to Housecathst | 7 years ago
0 likes

Housecathst wrote:

And the likelyhood of getting a conviction out of a jury of fellow motorists...... 

The law requires that someone accused is tried by a jury of their peers.  Thereby potentially reinforcing the power of a majority group.  I wonder if, in cases where there is a clear 'division' between accused and victim - driver/cyclist, one race and another, one gender and another - there's a case that juries must be representative of both sides of the division...

Avatar
Man of Lard | 7 years ago
0 likes

And all of it is academic as long as the likelihood of being observed by a constable, stopped and charged is slightly lower than winning the lotto.

More offences, stiffer penalties - but no extra impetus to enforce. Perhaps they could try enforcing the current laws (I'd support draconian enforcement to get the message across - speed by 5mph, have your car crushed on the spot - people would soon get the message)

Latest Comments