Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Man who delivered Team Sky package could be questioned by MPs – while doubts surround aspects of Sir Dave Brailsford’s evidence

Team Sky expresses confidence that Ukad will clear it of wrongdoing

The culture, media and sport select committee says it may question the man who delivered the package to Team Sky at the 2011 Critérium du Dauphiné with UK Anti-Doping apparently not yet having seen proof of what it contained.

Ex-British Cycling employee Simon Cope, now sports director at Team Wiggins, travelled 900 miles carrying what is said to have been medicine destined for Sir Bradley Wiggins – a product which could apparently have been bought at a local chemist for €8.

Cope flew from Manchester to Geneva on June 12, 2011, at the request of Team Sky, and handed a 'Jiffy bag envelope' to the team's doctor, Richard Freeman.

Speaking in October, he said there was nothing “dodgy” in the package, but also admitted that he didn’t know what it had contained.

"I don't have a clue what was in there. It wasn't something unusual either. If people were going somewhere they'd just say 'can you take this?' There's no way that British Cycling are going to put something dodgy or illegal for them to take through customs. It's just not going to happen. It's just madness. You have to go through two sets of customs. Why are you going to take the risk?”

Cope said that despite being the manager of the British women's team and the women's under-23 academy coach at that time, he would often attend professional men’s races and had been hoping to get a role as a sports director at Team Sky.

“I was women's coach in title, but I didn't actually have a role in 2011 and I did a hell of a lot of work for Sky.”

He added that this particular errand had also seen him deliver spare clothes.

Package contents and Wiggins’ medical records

Earlier this week, British Cycling President Bob Howden and Dr George Gilbert, who sits on the governing body’s board and chairs its Ethics Commission, repeatedly claimed to MPs that they were gagged by UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) from talking about the package while insisting they knew nothing of the contents.

Shane Sutton subsequently told the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee that it had contained medicine and Sir Dave Brailsford then said that it was a decongestant called Fluimucil.

Outlining the background to the delivery, Sutton said that Freeman had asked him if he knew anyone coming from the UK who could bring a package. Sutton said it was a Team Sky matter and nothing to do with British Cycling.

Brailsford said there “should be” a paper trail relating to the delivery of the Fluimucil and when asked if anything else had been in the package, replied: “I hope not.”

The Team Sky principal also claimed that Sir Bradley Wiggins had surrendered his medical records to Ukad, but it is unclear whether this is actually the case and The Guardian has reported that Ukad is yet to be presented with incontrovertible paper evidence of what was in the package.

Select committee to wait on Ukad report

The chair of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, Damian Collins, told the newspaper that he is “open” to interviewing Cope and bringing back previous witnesses in the new year, following Ukad’s report into the matter.

“I’m hoping to get the Ukad report early in the new year, but if we feel we can find out extra information we will look at interviewing Cope,” he said. “Certainly we want to find out whether Cope went to Team Sky specifically to deliver this package or whether he was going out to France anyway.”

Brailsford told the select committee that the coach was coming to France anyway to help with moving the team to another venue in northern Italy. However, Sutton said that he shared a car back to Geneva airport after Cope had made the delivery.

Collins also expressed concern at the claims of the Daily Mail's Matt Lawton that Brailsford had tried to kill the story for fear it would mean the end of Team Sky.

“We need to know when he knew what was in the package, and why he was seeking to close down a perfectly legitimate enquiry. It was perfectly right for Lawton to pursue this. Brailsford needs to explain what he knew and when – and why he didn’t tell Lawton what was in the package when he was first asked.”

Team Sky confident it will be cleared

In an emailed statement yesterday, Team Sky said:

"Dave [Brailsford] gave public evidence to the select committee [on Monday] for an hour as part of its inquiry into anti-doping.

"As we have always said, we believe what is most important is for UKAD to establish the truth independently. We are confident that when it reports it will be clear that there has been no wrongdoing.

"During the committee session, Dave acknowledged once again his own mistakes in handling the issue over recent months. We are continuing to co-operate fully with UKAD and we look forward to its report."

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Stumps | 8 years ago
0 likes

Comparing the drug testing etc at the time of LA and how he manipulated people to how it is now is like comparing a penny farthing to a Pinarello.

I dont believe anyone can get away with failing and manipulating multiple tests in this day in the way LA did, unless of course you get the tests done by russia sad

Avatar
davel | 8 years ago
0 likes

I get your point stumps but let's not forget Lance's mantra: 'the most tested man in the world never tested positive'. You can understand the public cynicism towards cycling.

It's this dragging people in front of MPs that I have a problem with. Is this one assisting the ukad investigation in any way? Or is it particularly toothless because of the ukad investigation.

These q&a sessions are the modern-day pillory but less effective - they're staged by MPs. All they accomplish is making people of their choosing squirm a bit, and creates the false impression among the public that these select committee sessions are making it so that these events are being tackled. It's PR for the committees and that's all.

How many MPs have been made to squirm in similar ways about their voting record, leaked memos, warmongering, evidence-denying insistence on austerity, lack of expertise in their ministerial remit or dodgy expense claims?

Avatar
Stumps | 8 years ago
0 likes

This is becoming painful. Its as though people are determined to find fault regardless of there being any evidence of anything untoward,

If my memory is correct Wiggins was tested numerous times in and around the time that the package was delivered without there being any problems with the test results either prior or after.

If anything, all Sky are guilty of is shite PR.

 

 

Avatar
Edgeley replied to Stumps | 8 years ago
0 likes

Stumps wrote:

This is becoming painful. Its as though people are determined to find fault regardless of there being any evidence of anything untoward,

If my memory is correct Wiggins was tested numerous times in and around the time that the package was delivered without there being any problems with the test results either prior or after.

If anything, all Sky are guilty of is shite PR.

 

 

 

 

You may well be right.  But as each pathetic statement from Sky person contains a new contradiction, Sky seem to be producing evidence against themselves, even if nobody else is.

At best incompetent.

 

As for the "he never posted positive", I think I may have heard that somewhere else before.

Avatar
Leviathan | 8 years ago
0 likes

Were Hillary's emails in there, or Vincent Vega's light bulb? Post-true? Post caring.

Avatar
burtthebike | 8 years ago
1 like

Personally, I'm so glad that MPs are spending their time investigating this cataclysmic event in the history of British cycling.  We deserve the truth.

Perhaps one day, they'll spend the same amount of time and effort investigating Grayling knocking off a cyclist.  But then, Grayling is an MP, so he's beyond reproach.

Avatar
SNS1938 | 8 years ago
2 likes

Love this, ''.. there was nothing “dodgy” in the package, but also admitted that he didn’t know what it had contained. "I don't have a clue what was in there...''

Dear Team Sky and BC, please hire a PR manager and have your staff trained on what to say to the press. So far we have'

 

'no needles ... unless it's medicine'

'it's not performance enhancing, it just raises my performance back to where it should have been' 

'it's not dodgy, but I don't know what it is'

'it's for Pooley, who wasnt even there'

'Brad wasnt even at the bus, although there's footage of him signing autographs at the bus'

 

Avatar
Must be Mad | 8 years ago
1 like

insteadof quizing all these people, why don't the MPs simply ask UKAD *the people running the investigation* for their report? I don't really see what is to be gained from dragging everyone back in again and asking the same questions.

Avatar
davel replied to Must be Mad | 8 years ago
0 likes

Must be Mad wrote:

insteadof quizing all these people, why don't the MPs simply ask UKAD *the people running the investigation* for their report? I don't really see what is to be gained from dragging everyone back in again and asking the same questions.

It makes the silly twats look like they're doing something, which is loads more important than actually doing something.

See Green, Philip; Goodwin, Fred; Murdoch, Rupert etc

Avatar
Edgeley | 8 years ago
1 like

"I don't have a clue what was in there. It wasn't something unusual either. If people were going somewhere they'd just say 'can you take this?' There's no way that British Cycling are going to put something dodgy or illegal for them to take through customs. It's just not going to happen. It's just madness. You have to go through two sets of customs. Why are you going to take the risk?”

 

 

There are not two sets of customs posts at all.....Geneva airport is in France, and there are no EU customs formalities.   And even if there were, the packet didn't contain anything illegal in the UK, France or Switzerland, so why would the customs officials have stopped him?    As far as I know, the UK and French immigration officials haven't been turned into an arm of the UCI or UKAD or any other sport governing bodies.

 

And why mention British Cycling if Sky are the organisation for whom Wiggins was riding at the time?

 

More dissembling from Sky.     As transparent as a brick wall.  The more they produce irrelevant arguments, the dodgier they appear.

 

Avatar
cs6xuk | 8 years ago
0 likes

I think it is worth listening to the cycling podcast by Richard moore, who interviewed Mr Brailsford on this matter.

Latest Comments