Motorist Gail Purcell, on trial for causing the death through careless driving of cyclist Michael Mason, told police that she “didn’t see” the cyclist when she struck him on London’s Regent Street in February 2014, causing him fatal injuries.
In what is believed to be a legal first, the Cyclists’ Defence Fund has crowdsourced more than £75,000 to bring a private prosecution of the driver after the Metropolitan Police decided not to refer the case to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Gail Purcell, 59, was driving home from her hair salon in Conduit Street, Soho, when she struck Mr Mason, known as Mick, just north of Oxford Circus, reports the London Evening Standard.
Mr Mason, known as Mick and who had been returning home from a visit to the Apple Store on Regent Street, died in hospital 19 days later, shortly after his 70th birthday. He had never regained consciousness.
The Old Bailey heard that following the fatal crash, Purcell, of St Albans, told police: I’m the driver. It was me. Is he okay? I just didn’t see him.”
She also told officers: “I didn’t see anybody from my left. It’s like they came from the sky.”
Simon Spence QC, prosecuting, told the court that one witness had seen Mr Mason "flying through the air" after he was hit from behind by the car Purcell was driving.
Another eyewitness said she believed the motorist was "going really fast," adding "the cyclist flew through the air."
Mr Spence told the court: “For whatever reason, the defendant simply did not see a cyclist in the carriageway ahead of her in the traffic in circumstances where she should have done, and she drove into the back of him, knocking him from his cycle and causing fatal head injuries.
“He was knocked from his cycle by the car driven by the defendant, who was driving in the same direction as Mr Mason.
"He certainly impacted with the bonnet of the car, and fell into the road."
Purcell denies the charge. The trial is scheduled to last for six days.
Please note that for legal reasons we are unable to accept comments on this story.
“you have to change the environmental cues to tell drivers what speed they should be safely driving at. And the problem with simply changing to...
As a Marxist/Leninist/Fascist/Neo-contrapuntalist, I wish to complain at your cancel culture.
But it rather depends on identifiying the suspect, and how would they do that?
No worries. In NFBUK world shared paths will be banned, so that goes away and you are back in the road .
He's not on the board as a representative of Shell.
Here is the headline and introduction which pretty much sums up the article....
google maps / my sat nav sat nav told me to come this way
"why should I be forced to cycle at 20mph when 25mph gets me there faster?"...
Or a Birdy. Though much rarer....
And today's self-appointed rapid reaction forum busybody is? ...