More than three years since a series of changes were made to the Highway Code to better protect vulnerable road users, prompting hysteria in certain sections of the British press, a recent survey has found that the majority of motorists are still unaware, or do not correctly understand, the rules around cyclists.
Those findings come courtesy of Scrap Car Comparison, who surveyed 2,000 drivers last month on their knowledge of the updated Highway Code and its rules concerning people on bikes, as well as their attitudes and behaviour towards cyclists on the road.
Changes to the Highway Code were implemented in January 2022 to better protect vulnerable road users, and included establishing a hierarchy of road users with those most vulnerable (pedestrians, cyclists, and horse riders) placed at the top.
Other updates included advising cyclists to “ride in the centre of your lane” to increase visibility on quiet roads, in slower-moving traffic, and when approaching junctions, and to stay 0.5m away from the kerb even on busy roads.
The Highway Code also acknowledges that it can often be safer to ride two abreast, particularly in larger groups or when accompanying less experienced cyclists, and while dedicated cycling infrastructure can make journeys “safer and easier”, cyclists “may exercise their judgement and are not obliged to use them”.
> The Highway Code for cyclists — all the rules you need to know for riding on the road explained
However, according to Scrap Car Comparison’s research – which provided drivers with four statements related to the Highway Code and asked them to determine whether they are true or false – it seems the new guidance still hasn’t fully crept into the public consciousness, three years on.
When provided with the statement ‘Cyclists must use a cycle lane is one is available’, 77 per cent of the motorists surveyed incorrectly asserted that this was true, while 65 per cent wrongly agreed that ‘cyclists must stay as close to the left-hand side of the road as possible’.
Meanwhile, half of those surveyed erroneously believed that the statement ‘Cyclists are allowed to take up a full lane of the road’ was false, with just 34 per cent identifying this as true. Meanwhile, over half (53 per cent) incorrectly agreed that cyclists must always ride in single file.
> Highway Code: One-in-four drivers still don't know correct rule on cyclist priority
“Seeing such a huge number of drivers answer incorrectly to these true and false statements highlights a hole in many people’s knowledge when it comes to the Highway Code,” the valuation site said in a statement.
“Many of the statements reference topics such as group riding and ‘taking the line’ which are common points of tension between cyclists and drivers, highlighting that regardless of whether a particular driver agrees with the rules or not, many conflicts could likely be avoided due to better understanding of the legalities of road cycling, and the responsibilities of drivers in these cases.
“However, it is well worth pointing out that many of the people that answered incorrectly were also cyclists, again demonstrating the importance of everyone, cyclist or not, brushing up on the rules of the road. With so many people heading out on their bikes without a clear understanding of where they stand legally on the road, there’s no wonder that the driver-cyclist relationship is so strained!”
> "Check the Highway Code": Police officer claims cyclist shouldn't ride "in the middle of the road"
This “strained” driver-cyclist relationship was explored elsewhere in the survey, with motorists asked about how they feel when sharing the road with people on bikes.
According to the survey, 74 per cent of motorists said they feel “some level” of frustration when driving near cyclists, with less than 10 per cent claiming that they “never” feel frustration.
These levels of frustration were highest among drivers aged between 17 and 24 – with 81 per cent of those in that bracket admitting they get frustrated by cyclists – while women (76 per cent) are more likely to become frustrated than men (71 per cent).
Unsurprisingly, a higher percentage of non-cyclists (76 per cent) experience frustration when driving near people on bikes than cyclists, though a shockingly high 64 per cent of self-described cyclists admitted feeling some frustration when driving their car around those on two wheels.
> “Read the Highway Code – that is not a safe pass”: Police say post advising drivers to give cyclists “an arm’s length” of space while overtaking was published “in error”
Meanwhile, 75 per cent of drivers said they always, often, or sometimes feel nervous when around cyclists, with this number highest among women (81 per cent) and young drivers (88 per cent).
And finally, drawing on the kinds of toxic social media debates surrounding cycling, the survey asked its participants: “Do you believe that cyclists have equal rights to use the road as drivers?” In response, 33 per cent stated that cyclists shouldn’t have equal rights, though 60 per cent agreed that they should.
Perhaps more encouragingly, 96 per cent of drivers claimed that they always leave the recommended 1.5m when overtaking cyclists, though 47 per cent said they’d been involved in a near miss with a cyclist at least once on the roads.
> Cyclists wearing helmets seen as "less human" than those without, researchers find
Using the data collected from their survey, the researchers compiled an index of the least bike-friendly cities in the UK, as well as the car brands most associated with negativity towards cycling.
According to their table, Sheffield finished ‘top’ as the least cycle-friendly city in the country, with a ‘cycling negativity’ score of 92.5 – based on knowledge, frustration, attitudes, and overtaking distances – with Newcastle and Leeds rounding off the podium with 84.1 and 82.8 respectively.
Belfast was revealed to be the UK’s most bike-friendly city, with a lowly negativity score of 56 – though, judging by the recent backlash against the Northern Ireland capital’s paltry cycling infrastructure and dangerous road conditions, I’m not sure many of the city’s cyclists would agree with that particular accolade.
When it comes to car brands, Mazda owners topped the table for cycling negativity, with a score of 83.3, while Mercedes-Benz enthusiasts were a close second with 83, with Seat in third at 77.7. Audi, meanwhile, only came tenth, with a score of 73.4.
> “The day cyclists took over the roads”: The Times, Darren Grimes and TikTok react as new Highway Code revisions come into force this weekend
As noted above, the changes to the Highway Code were brought in three years ago and prompted much discussion and hysteria at the time. Just days before the revisions came into force, two major newspapers misrepresented the rules around the ‘Dutch Reach’ technique, designed to reduce the chances of dooring a cyclist.
A further concern came with the lack of communication of the changes to the public, with Cycling UK at the time calling for a long-term public awareness campaign to help produce a “mindset shift” on British roads.
In fact, it took until July 2022, six months after they came into effect, for the changes to be promoted in a THINK! road safety campaign, though an AA survey from three months later showed that 61 per cent of drivers had not read the new rules – a situation which, judging by this most recent research, has persisted into 2025.
Add new comment
67 comments
I suspect there may be an element of misunderstanding of the rules going on too, even among those who have read them. I was once close passed by the driver of a cement mixer truck while negotiating a roundabout (that was a fun one). When he got out of his cab to remonstrate with me after I shouted at him, he indicated the gap between the side of his vehicle and the kerb and said "see, I left you a metre and a half", clearly not understanding that he's meant to leave 1.5m clearance from the outer-most point of my bike.
**intentional misunderstanding**
Its extraordinarily difficult to convince someone of a fact that is detrimental to themselves. People are going to interpret the rules in the way that is most favourable (See every discussion on twitter where they will produce the rule saying move right and single file to let traffic past, ignoring the important bits before that say for example by and aftere that says where safe...)
I would question whether 96% of drivers have heard of (or understand) the 2022 updates to the highway code, never mind conform to them.
Ride single file, stay close to the curb? Where I live, I get people screaming at cyclists telling them they don't belong on the road, I was riding in a bike lane and some dope screamed at me saying that bicycles don't belong on the road!! Good ol America!
It's an interesting survey, and useful if it gets people talking. Like others, I take the 96% with a massive grain of salt, and I do wonder the order in which questions were asked. I could see some people saying they are 'sometimes frustrated' by cyclists because they are a bit nervous about ensuring they do pass in an appropriate place, and might be wondering where the next appropriate place is, only for there to be cars coming the other way etc. That person is thinking something entirely different from the person letting themselves get angry that they have to share the space.
The findings back up my hunch that a lot of the reason so many drivers get angry with cyclists is because they think we are braking the law, and/or being inconsiderate. The good news is that at least some of that anger will be mitigated if and when more drivers have a better knowledge of the rules, and crucially IMO, an understanding of why cyclists shouldn not hug the kerb and why single file isn't always easier to overtake etc.
Some time ago I was on a thankfully fairly quiet dual carriageway when I realised my brakes were a bit soft (turns out I was losing brake fluid), so I reduced my speed until I could find a suitable layby to stop in, which took a while, as I wanted a clear view of big space with no-one behind me so I could slow right down. I was shocked at how many drivers would come up behind me and would not overtake for some distance, even though they clearly wanted to go faster than me, and it was an easy overtake. I concluded there are some drivers who dislike or are scared of the easiest of overtaking maneuvres, so become stressed when 'stuck behind' a tractor or bike, and at least some of them will blame the person slowing them down. Instead of thinking 'maybe I should brush up on my driving skills' they are annoyed they have been subjected to something unfair.
Also good point - possibly there is the known and despised population of MGIFs but also one of "cautious overtakers".
The latter for good reason - it's probably the riskiest thing a driver can do (for their own safety).
Hence why at least one country has simply banned overtaking on some classes of road - and even physically blocked it in places.
I also think you're correct about "but cyclists are breaking rules / being inconsiderate". I think that's a deep human psychological thing to do with "detecting cheating" and "respect from lower-ranking humans". Cyclists are clearly not drivers and generally "go slower" and in fact "can walk around" with their transport - which drivers cannot. So they are at best "in the way and should move aside" but really "shouldn't be there at all".
That is a powerful (and useful) human driver and I don't think anything will really "fix" that - not education etc. Except possibly like e.g. NL have done through creating traffic-reduced and speed-reduced "access only" local areas. And generating general "understanding" / empathy because people see cyclists there all the time (so it's also "their" space) and maybe cycle there sometimes themselves (as do their children).
I actually ride like that ! Mind I ride a Pashley and shows my ignorance of the law!
We should all just respect one another!
We should all just respect one another!
Oh dear, not bloody 'can't we all just get along' from a driving anti-cyclist, again!
Take a look at the big red Montgomery Distribution 44 tonner below. If only I'd respected him.
They clearly spotted you for a scofflaw and possible vigilante * from a way off - by the fact you were riding a bike on the road!
If you had been riding the bike on "the pavement" of course you'd also be an easily identified asocial.
* And having posted footage on the internet / attempted to provide it to the police, you've proved them right!
Alongside that we should respect ourselves, and that means not cringing in the gutter tugging our forelocks to our motoring overlords, thereby putting ourselves in danger.
Cars have to keep left, why wouldn't bikes? And cycling 2 abreast is just plain stupid and putting yourself in harms way. Just because activists got the highway code changed, that doesn't make it a good thing, or even sensible much less safe. And I speak as a cyclist.
But it is the law so it is allowed. It does make cyclists safer and that's from a cyclist.
No one drives hugging the kerb or in the door zone.
But even if they did, they'd still also be "in the middle of the road" (lane). Even if there was only one person in the vehicle.
But this poster says it's plain stupid *and* they're a cyclist, so they must be right...
Presumably they're beating the drum for separated cycle infra very loudly?
Perhaps we could put cycle lanes down the middle of roads, seeing as how all these law-abiding drivers apparently have to drive as close to the kerb as possible? Got to free up some room down the centre...
IIRC some UK schemes have actually done exactly this(!) Truly one of the Good Idea fairy's post-pub or even post-NL-coffee-shop visits....
Of course what goes down the middle of roads is ... the tram! (Although for ease of boarding not having to cross a motor lane might be better. And better have a 20mph speed limit.)
Yeah "as a cyclist myself.. ". , 😂
Shame "cars" (drivers) can't seem to keep left on the motorway innit? And driving around solo on short journeys in urban environments is just plain stupid.
And I speak as a driver.
Final sentence corrected.
Without activists there wouldn't be a lot of beneficial, even lifesaving things, so no need to slur them. Idiots like you wouldn't be able to vote, for a start.
If you don't like the rules then campaign for them to reversed (although that required you to become an activist so I won't hold my breath).
In my experience of daily riding I find far more drivers give me a good amount of room on 2-lane roads than I remember 15 or 20 years ago. But I somehow doubt the 1.5 metre rule is one many drivers consider or could quote from memory.
However, on country lanes I find a lot of drivers refuse to slow adequately, whether overtaking or oncoming. It seems the bigger and more expensive the vehicle (i.e. SUVs and Transit-type vans) the more aggressive and greater the degree of bullying by the driver while those in small hatchbacks are generally more cautious and respectful.
"Activists"? What activities / protests do you think caused the HC changes? The changes were certainly lobbied for, by groups like Cycling UK, but the lobbyng power of cyclists is miniscule when compared to the motor industry.
Drivers have to drive on the left, and when there is more than one lane (except at junctions) stay in the left lane except when overtaking. There is nothing to say they have to drive on the left of the lane, though, same as with cyclists.
So they were asked what the HC says and answered with what they thought that it OUGHT to say?
Well there's a surprise, not. Between close passes and people on the phone while drivving, if I was to submit every offence I see and the cops take action for each of those, I'd be getting points on the licence of a lot of people.
About half the car drivers do not have the right to drive a car on our roads because they are drunk and/or drug drivers.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. ... do share.
Too many idiots out there.
One car length from a layby, so park on the pavement on double yellows.
Just how ???
BOLAS tho...
and they work on a BMW !!!
Yup - they ought to return it as defective
Pages