Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Team Sky alleged to have injected riders to help them recover

Insider's claims may throw fresh light on Wiggins 2011 Dauphiné controversy...

Team Sky’s medical practices are under fresh scrutiny following claims that riders received injections to help their recovery after some of them asked the team to revise the ‘no-needles’ policy it adopted when it began racing in 2010.

According to the Guardian, a source within the team told UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) that the procedure was used after the UCI had also introduced a ‘no-needles’ policy at races in 2011, but said it may have been done within the rules.

The newspaper says that the claims were made in a letter sent in February to Damian Collins, the Folkestone & Hythe MP who is chairing a House of Commons select committee inquiry into doping in sport.

The person who sent the letter is described as a “Sky insider” and according to the Guardian also got in touch with UKAD as part of its investigation into the team.

Among the claims made in the letter are that while the ‘mystery package’ delivered to the team’s doctor at the 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné did indeed include the decongestant Fluimucil, as Sir Dave Brailsford has insisted.

But the source said that the drug, which is not banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency, may have been used via injections to help riders recover.

That may help explain one of the aspects of the affair that has puzzled some, namely why Sir Bradley Wiggins would have been administered the drug immediately after winning the French stage race, given he would not race again until the British national championships a fortnight later.

When he testified before the Commons select committee in December, Brailsford said that Fluimucil was “a decongestant that you put in a nebuliser. I couldn’t see any anti-doping rule violation.”

No mention was made of needles, nor of the drug being used for recovery purposes, although under anti-doping rules in force at the time, injections could not be administered until two days after a competition finished.

The Guardian reported a UKAD spokesperson as saying that the agency “does not discuss or disclose information in relation to its investigations.”

It added that Team Sky commented: “It is right that any concerns are reported to and dealt with by the appropriate authorities, and we will continue to co-operate with them,” and that it has not yet been contacted by “any of the relevant authorities.” 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

5 comments

Avatar
shutuplegz | 7 years ago
1 like

Does this mystery 'insider' have the initials JTL by any chance?

Avatar
Stumps | 7 years ago
1 like

As far as I'm aware Damian Green has not mentioned this previously, so I ask myself did he actually receive a letter or is it more shite from wannabe reporters ????

Avatar
Vili Er | 7 years ago
3 likes

'Among the claims made in the letter are that while the ‘mystery package’ delivered to the team’s doctor at the 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné did indeed include the decongestant Fluimucil, as Sir Dave Brailsford has insisted.'

 

Who proof reads this drivel?

Avatar
Must be Mad | 7 years ago
1 like

Well, it has been at least a fortnight since the last damming accusation was drip-leaked. Let's see how this one plays out.

However for the sake of enlightenment, can someone clarify for me why a rider would need an injection "for recovery" once the race is already finished? Between stages I can understand - but when your next race is two weeks away?

Avatar
Jackson replied to Must be Mad | 7 years ago
3 likes

Must be Mad wrote:

However for the sake of enlightenment, can someone clarify for me why a rider would need an injection "for recovery" once the race is already finished? Between stages I can understand - but when your next race is two weeks away?

To recover

Latest Comments