Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cyclists' opposition to forest sell-off gathers pace

Opponents claim 15% of forests would have no public access guarantees

The Government’s plans to sell off England’s publicly-owned forests have encountered stiff opposition from cyclists, horse riders and others concerned about the perceived threat to public access.

The plans involve the disposal of 258,000 hectares of public forests but the Government maintains that public access will be enshrined in the terms of the sell-offs. However, last week the Telegraph claimed that about 15 per cent of the woodlands will not be covered by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs’ (Defra) assurances about public access.

A Defra spokesman told the ‘paper: "You are right to say this 15 per cent being sold off will not have the same guarantees of access that the land has at the moment."

The Department will be able to sell off 15 per cent England’s Forestry Commission-managed public forests without the need for legislation. The remaining 85 per cent is the subject of a consultation process currently underway.

With many parents unwilling to allow their children to ride bikes on public roads, forest tracks are seen as a safe environment in which to introduce them to cycling. Among other fears about public access is the concern that an increasingly sedentary young population will have an option to take exercise in the fresh air taken away from them

The campaign against the sell-off appears to be gathering pace with MPs from the three main parties and celebrities including Melvyn Bragg joining the chorus of disapproval against the Government’s plans.

Around 333,000 people have signed an online petition to resist the sell-off, using the website 38 degrees.
 

Add new comment

3 comments

Avatar
Paul M | 13 years ago
0 likes

What a bizarre place we live in, where people feel they need to transport their bikes in/on a car before they can ride them!

What we really need is for our roads to be safe for us to ride on, especially our children. And I don't mean CTC's "hierarchy of provision". That is where we should be putting our energies.

Avatar
LondonCalling replied to Paul M | 13 years ago
0 likes

Fair enough, but I'd rather ride through a forest than on any road, safe or not. Having to deal with polution and noise? Why?

If you add to this the Lambeth Thames riverside issue, plus Clapham Common speed limit, I'm starting to get really worried for the future of cycling - leisure cycling mainly - in this country. It's not looking good.

But maybe I'm just a pesismist....

Avatar
antonio | 13 years ago
0 likes

'Ok, you can have access but it will be £25 car parking where ever you park'

Latest Comments