- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
The variety of 'Popular Belief' is a clear indication that few people actually know for sure if council proposals have been introduced or is still in discussion. I was once shouted at by an angry pedestrian who's dog ran in front of me, saying that: 'There's a sign over there clearly stating No cycling!' When I got 'the sign' it said nothing about cycling, however, it stated all dogs must be on leads... Perhaps people just like to use 'popular belief' to back their opinion.
There are various examples of 'Pedestrian Priority' on the CycleStreets Photomap:
http://www.cyclestreets.net/location/16515,22338,25909,14992/
If cycling is not banned in a place like Cambridge, where there are masses of cyclists, and sharing the space works acceptably, why ban it in Stevenage?
http://www.camcycle.org.uk/newsletters/70/article3.html
http://www.camcycle.org.uk/campaigning/issues/cyclingban/
"The majority of cyclists in Stevenage do not cycle in the town centre. It is only a small number of people who make life very, very uncomfortable and potentially dangerous for both the young and the elderly and maybe even the able-bodied on occasions."
Exactly the same could be said of cycling on the roads of Stevenage. The town was badly planned so that all types of road use has been vigorously segregated. As a result drivers and cyclists seem to be very uncertain about how to behave around each other. There have been several times when I have cycled through town on stretches of road where there are no cycle tracks or the cycle tracks are useless to me and find myself coming into conflict with drivers who just don't know how to deal with a cyclist because they so rarely see them.
Truth be told, Stevenage is a bit of a dump and there's one less reason to go now.
Only joking, errr, sort of!
Same situation in many towns. Developers even put cycling parking in places where councils say you shouldn't cycle. They'd be crucified for putting car parks in places you can't drive to, so why not for bike parking?
The solution is to do what has now been done for the Thames (Cycling and Walking) Path at Southwark and has been signposted at Pitlochry for over a decade. Sadly the UK TSRGD manual fails to deliver an official wording or pictogram but the Hong Kong Signs Manual (originally from same sources) does deliver signs and management regimes for Pedestrian Priority over all wheeled traffic.
This is a simple sign and the Highways Act 1835 with the usual well considered thoroughness of the time delivered s.71, where a user of a carriage (the bicycle was defined as a carriage in the late 1800's followed by the motor car in the early 1900's) could be prosecuted for riding or driving furiously - generally to the alarm and discomfort of the pedestrian traffic.
We desperately need an officially recognised sign and regime to deliver Pedestrian Priority on shared routes (Southwark) in public spaces (Stevenage) and in large car parks. Any MP's looking for an idea for their private member's bill allocation? Any local council care to develop the pilot as a by-law? Any supermarket or multi storey parking operator, or airport consider introducing this regime on a private site?