Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
2 comments
Lets get even more fundamental about this - there is NO EU LEGISLATION setting standards for the minimum direct vision available from the driving position of a truck, and NO EU LEGISLATION on the Collision Management Systems applied to new cars (ENCAP). In fact EU Legislation presses the haulage industry to make truck cabs take up the shortest possible amount of vehicle length - delivering trucks with the aerodynamic efficiency of a brick with a seriously negative design in terms of collision safety.
I urge all to read the T&E report on making trucks safer. They estimate that across the EU adding CMS features to the front of a truck, and through this improving the direct vision from the driving position would halve the fatalities arising from truck crashes - around 3000 lives per year saved. There may be some costs, but through this redesign the trucks would be aerodynamically transformed and thus the fuel consumption cut, along with the emissions footprint - saving money for the hauliers, and the environment for the world.
A CMS design of truck front would deflect a cyclist or pedestrian to the side, unlike the current flat front which knocks them down, and helpless to avoid being crushed under the wheels.
There is a window of opportunity in that EU regulations for truck design are under review, and we can lobby to make direct vision and CMS part of that review.
Even now trucks can be built without blind spots. Check out the trucks used on airports, or collecting refuse, with walk-in cabs, and drivers at eye-level with cyclists outside - Dennis-Eagle Elite and Mercedes-Benz Econic are the leading brands. Ask whether the 10-15% premium on these higher spec trucks is a too great a price for safety?
I hope to get to London Wall tomorrow - I was there just after Alex was killed and watched the Police reversing the truck back along its trajectory, and walking back the tyre and debris trail from the bike. The left turn was made from the offside lane, using the truck aggressively to force a priority across traffic in the nearside lane, and neglecting to account for a cyclist using the nearside lane. That turn was illegal - Copthall Avenue had a 7.5 Ton weight restriction for through traffic - the 4-axle concrete trucks weigh 32 Tons with a load on.
Go figure as they say.
I think that it is time to organise a protest in London and other major cities, to demonstrate for more cycling safety, awareness and against the very lenient way car drivers who kill are sanctioned by the courts.
Cycling is now very popular in many parts of the country, and I suppose we have reached a critical mass that would make the protests very significant. OK also I am French and it is part of my DNA But I think we need to put some pressure on the politics, considering the hostility from gutter press and the worrying declarations of some PCCs.
Do you know which channels to use to organise such demonstartions? They need to be advertised and done when people are available.