Like this site? Help us to make it better.

UCI rejects Riccardo Riccò's claims that 44 more riders tested positive during 2008 Tour de France

Italian was one of four riders sanctioned after 2008 Tour - but he says dozens others failed doping controls too

The UCI has strongly rejected a claim made on Twitter yesterday evening by the banned Italian cyclist Riccardo Riccò that 44 riders, tested positive for EPO or its variant CERA during the 2008 Tour de France, beyond the four who have officially ever been sanctioned.

The 29-year-old won two stages of the race but was sent home from it and fired by his Saunier-Duval team after testing positive for CERA. He would ultimately receive a 20-month ban as a result of that positive test, reduced from the maximum 24 months due to the co-operation he had given to the authorities.

Yesterday evening during an exchange on Twitter with Rome-based website Cycling Pro, Riccò said he knows the identity of all the riders in question, but won’t divulge the list.

In a further tweet on Tuesday evening, the Italian claimed that one of the four riders who had been revealed as testing positive during the race had, by mistake, been sent to their home address a list of the 48 names of all those testing positive.

The tweets were reported this morning on the website Cycling News, and given that Riccò is currently serving a 12-year ban as a result of the botched self-administered blood transfusion early last year that led to him being hospitalised, and also resulted in him being sacked by Vacansoleil-DCM, many would have expected that to be the end of the matter.

However, the UCI - not itself mentioned in any of the tweets - moved today to categorically reject Riccò’s claims, while at the same time underlining that it was not itself directly involved in anti-doping measures at the 2008 Tour.

In a statement, world cycling's governing body said:

An article in Cycling News today reported that the Italian rider Riccardo Riccò, who is currently suspended for doping until April 2024, claimed on social media that many more riders had tested positive for EPO at the 2008 Tour de France than the four who were caught.

Riccò, Stefan Schumacher, Leonardo Piepoli and Bernhard Kohl all returned positive tests at the 2008 Tour. But Riccò claimed on his Twitter account that more riders had tested positive.

This unsubstantiated claim is totally untrue. In the 2008 Tour de France, the French anti-doping agency (AFLD) was solely responsible for carrying out all anti-doping testing. The UCI was not involved in the testing as the 2008 Tour de France was not on the UCI calendar but was organized as a national event.

However, any adverse analytical finding from a test that was carried out during the 2008 Tour de France was reported by the lab directly to AFLD with a copy to UCI and WADA and was seen and reviewed by AFLD, UCI and WADA. It is simply not possible for a positive test to be covered up.

The categorical statement in that final sentence comes the day after British Cycling president Brian Cookson, publishing his manifesto for the UCI presidential election in September, vowed that if he were elected he would make it a priority to authorise a fully independent investigation into allegations that the UCI has colluded in covering up positive tests in the past – an accusation levelled at it in USADA’s Reasoned Decision in the Lance Armstrong case.

While the timing may explain the UCI's decision to go public in its vehement denial of Riccò's claims, it may seem to many unusual that it has chosen to respond in such a way to him, especially given the fact that the governing body itself was not mentioned.

Some may however see parallels with its past attacks on Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton, among others, regarding the allegations they made against Lance Armstrong, ones that the UCI long condemned as false, although ultimately in backing USADA's lifetime ban of the Texan last October, the governing body accepted them as true, even before his confession.

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Latest Comments

  • chrisonatrike 1 sec ago

    Thinking on that - having the road police empowered to destroy your vehicle there and then for any RTA violations... ...

  • Owd Big 'Ead 34 min 45 sec ago

    While it is atrocious driving, it could have been avoided if the cyclist had actually taken the lane, instead of riding in the gutter. Always...

  • mtnbikerva1 39 min 44 sec ago

    Most if not all of us have been blinded by the sun while driving at some point. I am glad that nobody seems to of been injured in this accident....

  • OldRidgeback 42 min 59 sec ago

    Good on her for getting back on the bike. It was a nasty crash. And it's a real shame the person who caused it has never been caught. 

  • PRSboy 43 min 55 sec ago

    And another thing... on the mobile site via Firefox it can take an age to be able to click in the text box to get the cursor to write a comment.   

  • Rendel Harris 1 hour 14 min ago

    That's a fair point to consider, I would only say to counter that that obviously cars that live in outer London boroughs don't always stay in outer...

  • Rendel Harris 1 hour 27 min ago

    Of course they should - if I can do it they can, I have to spend a lot more energy getting moving again. High time that should was made a must. In...

  • benthebikeman 2 hours 20 min ago

    Planet X Tempest... just sayin! Never gets a mention but has consistently delivered great value titanium all purpose on/off road do it all bike/...

  • EK Spinner 2 hours 22 min ago

    Worse than that, they have "singilarised" it (is the that the reverse of pluralise) to become PANT I though that was what dogs did

  • Roady 2 hours 26 min ago

    Had a set of these (original 2015/16 versions) in 25/28 on my 2016 Diverge. Fairly ok experience, found them a little heavy (coming from other...