Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Delays to introduction of online road safety portal putting cyclists “at risk”, says Cycling UK

“Not only have the police failed to deliver justice in my case, they are failing to ensure our roads are kept safe from those who pose the greatest danger to others”, says hit-and-run victim

Delays to the introduction of an online road safety reporting portal are putting cyclists in Scotland "at risk", says Cycling UK - after Police Scotland took over a year to report an alleged hit-and-incident which left a rider "unable to sit down for a week", leading to the case being dismissed.

Police Scotland and the Scottish Government announced funding for a national safety portal last year, but it hasn’t been implemented yet. 

Scottish cyclists currently have to use the Police Scotland Online Reporting Form, which is time-consuming and inconsistent, with how an incident is handled often depending on the attitudes of different police forces and officers.

As we reported earlier this week, Alan Myles contacted Police Scotland 30 times after he was the victim of a hit-and-run in November 2021. Police Scotland took a year to report the incident (with one officer taking over six months to open an email containing footage of the alleged collision) to the Procurator Fiscal, Scotland's public prosecutor, who dismissed the case because it was time-barred.

“Ever since I was knocked off my bike, every time I head out for a ride to work or with friends and family, I have that nagging thought that maybe I’ll be hit again – maybe that same person who drove into me will be out on the road again,” Mr Myles said.

“Not only have the police failed to deliver justice in my case, they are failing to ensure our roads are kept safe from those who pose the greatest danger to others.” 

> Driver escapes punishment for alleged hit-and-run on cyclist, as victim blasts police inaction and “barriers to justice”

Police Scotland and the Scottish Government have promised to introduce a third-party National Dashcam Safety Portal, but the project has seen delays and in October 2022, Police Scotland said that the portal was ‘under review’ due to budget constraints.

Cycling UK have been campaigning to introduce the portal since 2021. The campaign has received support from 33 road user organisations including the AA and the RAC.

> Here's what to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision on camera while cycling

Keir Gallagher, Cycling UK campaigns manager said the portal would save time and money, is widely supported by the public, is used successfully elsewhere in the UK and will help deliver road safety and justice consistently across Scotland. 

“It’s not just Mr Myles who has been let down by Police Scotland’s failure to investigate and report this collision to the Procurator Fiscal within the necessary 12-month timeframe but responsible drivers, cyclists and pedestrians across Scotland," he said.

“Had the force and the Government made good on their commitment to introduce a National Dashcam Safety Portal, as is in operation across most of the UK, arguably the investigation could have been concluded in a timely and cost-effective manner that would have delivered justice and safer roads.

“There is a clear lack of consistency in investigating road crimes at branch level which the portal would help to address.”

He continued: “Responsible drivers, cyclists and pedestrians in Scotland shouldn’t be put at risk because of delays to the National Dashcam Safety Portal.

“Police Scotland and the Government must urgently get together and find a solution to get this vital road safety tool up and running as a matter of the highest priority.”

Mr Myles said the portal needs to be introduced urgently, "so that no one else has to go through what I have".

> Not giving up — why a camera cyclist driven off social media by abuse won’t stop reporting dangerous motorists

This has been echoed in recent weeks by Scottish camera cyclist Deacon Thurston, who told road.cc in an interview that the current method is time-consuming and complicated, resulting in not enough victims reporting offences, and that Police Scotland aren't capable of acting on video reports as effectively as elsewhere in the UK.

He said that allowing third-party reporting for traffic offences would "massively improve" the system.

Responding to road.cc’s request for a comment concerning the delays to the investigation of Mr Myles’ hit-and-run allegations, a Police Scotland spokesperson said: “Around 9.25am on Tuesday, 30 November, 2021, we received a report of a hit and run on Glen Road, between Lennoxtown and Milton of Campsie.

“Enquiries were carried out and a 55-year-old man was charged in connection with the incident.

“A report was submitted to the Procurator Fiscal on December 11, 2022.

“Any member of the public who has any complaints about Police Scotland can contact us by visiting our website - www.scotland.police.uk, or calling 101.”

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
11 likes

I've been mulling over todays incident - overtook by an Audi on approach to a mini-roundabout who turned left immediately in front of me.

But ... its Police Scotland, and the driver won't be able to remember it happening (as its probably so common for them as a driver, they'll struggle to isolate the single incident amongst the many) ... so I've decided against it.
What's the fecking point ... nothing will happen (fuck, the guy who changed my life only got 6 points and a 250 quid fine - dealt with by fixed penalty points at the scene); all a visit from the Polis is gonna do, is make the cunt turn up the aggression against cyclists.

So ... instead, I'll just email it over to NMOTD instead, put it on my socials and that'll be that ... might even send it in to all Britain's Got Shit driving...

Avatar
Oldfatgit replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
8 likes

Having run the GOV.UK vehicle enquiry service, I've just changed my mind ...

Avatar
wtjs replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
4 likes

Having run the GOV.UK vehicle enquiry service, I've just changed my mind ...

The implication of that comment is that absence of MOT on a vehicle being driven on the public road will suddenly get the police waking up and acting like Robocop. The Scottish traffic police look to me to be as idle and crap as Lancashire, so don't get your hopes up. BG67 YVC was first identified and reported as No MOT, Failed MOT for major braking defect and SORN on a photo of 10.2.23. It's freely driving around every working day, and is parked up most of the day at a building site 1/2 a mile from Garstang Police station, as I informed the police. This is the most recent shot, because I think he was on holiday last week- I fully expect him to be back tomorrow

Avatar
Oldfatgit replied to wtjs | 1 year ago
7 likes

2 months out of tax 
Despite the video clearly showing the object being thrown ... no prosectution as "the driver can't remember".

Yes ... Police Scotland are a shit shower.

Avatar
AidanR replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
3 likes

But... But... How can "I don't recall" possibly be a defence against committing a crime?!

Avatar
giff77 replied to AidanR | 1 year ago
2 likes

It has fast become a default defence and there is now precedent in Scotland which makes it acceptable. 

Avatar
wtjs replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
2 likes

I'll see your 2 months out of tax and raise you W800 GMC, coming up to 5 years without MOT, insurance or VED. You can forget about Police Interceptors in Lancashire and Scotland at least- surely there's a market for Police Useless Idle Lying Bent Tossers?

Avatar
Browsie replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
1 like

He'll simply tell the filth that he forgot to MOT it and that will be that !

Avatar
giff77 | 1 year ago
4 likes

It's incredibly frustrating. To the best of my knowledge Polis Scotland can only use photographic evidence to issue a FPN when it's come from a speed camera or traffic light camera. Any other traffic offence reported using cams has to be included on the report to the Fiscal who then decide whether to issue a FPN or summons. Even with that, the PF has so many thresholds in place it's not worth the constables time even producing a report. It got to a stage that I simply asked the officer to go and give the driver a bolllicking. 

The government is really going to have to make changes to allow the police to issue a FPN for a close pass without it going through the Fiscal except in the most extreme cases. So unless there's a following police vehicle you're pretty much stuffed. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
5 likes

Given the cost of a road death/serious injury, surely a portal for reporting dangerous drivers would save its cost many times over?

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
6 likes

Depends who's budget it comes out of.

I have (probably rather unfairly) suggested in the past that certain Police authorities have decided it is cheaper to employ trained family liason officers rather than spend resources on roads policing. But when you see how much blatant road crime occurs and the daily newsreel of local collisions resulting in delays, injuries and deaths you have to wonder.

Avatar
giff77 replied to Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
5 likes

The Scottish Government allocated funding for this. It has been sitting languishing in a suspense ledger since then. Polis Scotland from what I can see is reticent to join any of the established portals used by other forces across the G.B. As they have previously stated they were looking into how one would work. To me it looks like they want to rebuild the wheel themselves. 

Avatar
mattw | 1 year ago
2 likes

Sounds like one for a legal action, if feasible.

Avatar
Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
4 likes

So, what is Scottish Cycling / British Cycling doing about this?

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Oldfatgit | 1 year ago
2 likes

Angling to get a little bit more sponsorship money from the Scottish Oil and Gas industry probably.

Avatar
wtjs | 1 year ago
5 likes

I foresee much disappointment ahead- Lancashire Constabulary has had a 'portal' for years, but that hasn't stopped them ignoring pretty much all offences against cyclists

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
7 likes

What's not mentioned here but mention in the CUK article is that this is the same  Branch of  ScotFilth (East Dumbartonshire) that has form for letting off Drivers. 
 

(I'll stop calling them filth when they get their act together.)

Avatar
wtjs replied to Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
0 likes

the same  Branch of  ScotFilth (East Dumbartonshire) that has form for letting off Drivers

I think we should forestall an attack of rage from Nicola or her successor, by pointing out that it's 'East Dunbartonshire'. Was it SS who coined the term 'ScotRozzer' some months ago? I wanted to use it, but felt I wasn't really entitled to

Avatar
Safety | 1 year ago
13 likes

Well done to Cycling UK for highlighting this issue and fighting for cyclists safety. Keep up the good work

Latest Comments