Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

East Sussex to scrap half of its planned emergency active travel schemes

DfT had awarded county more than its expected funding due to quality of its proposals

East Sussex County Council is set to scrap half the planned cycling and walking schemes, despite  receiving more than its originally allocated share of Department for Transport (DfT) emergency active travel funding due to the quality of its proposals.

The Argus reports that of the 16 planned schemes for pedestrians and cyclists, council officials have recommended shelving nine of them – raising the prospect that the DfT will claw back some of the first-tranche funding it awarded the local authority.

Among the schemes that are scheduled to be discontinued are a cycle lane on the A259 coastal road linking Newhaven and Peacehaven, as well as one to widen pavements on Lewes High Street.

Liberal Democrat David Tutt, the leader of Eastbourne Council, said: “Public expectations were very high, particularly when the county council announced its proposals had been so well received by the Department for Transport that more money had been allocated than had been asked for.

“The fact that so many of the schemes have now been withdrawn has caused reputational damage to the county council and has undermined the huge efforts made by volunteers in the community who have put forward well-researched schemes,” he added.

According to the Argus, the following schemes will now be shelved:

Wider pavements from the A259 in Bishopstone to Marine Parade in Seaford as “significant works” would be needed

A cycle lane on the A259 between Peacehaven and Newhaven as works would be “very disruptive”

Wider pavements in Lewes High Street and School Hill as traders are opposed and social distancing rules have been relaxed

Wider pavements in Devonshire Road and Western Road in Bexhill as there has been a lot of opposition and social distancing rules have been relaxed

Wider pavements from Warrior Square to London Road in Hastings as the scheme would be small

Closing Bolton Road to Langney Road in Eastbourne between 10am and 10pm each day as the impact would be “too significant”

Partially closing Rye High Street as businesses are opposed to the move.

The newspaper reports a county council spokeswoman as saying that the decision not to proceed with some of those planned initiatives was due to “extremely tight” deadlines which in turn meant design issues could not be resolved.

She said: “As well as strict criteria for acceptable schemes, the Government has insisted that any measures must be in place within eight weeks of money being awarded,” she said.

“We undertook consultation on the measures and we listened to all the feedback before deciding which schemes we could progress.

“However, later this year we will be consulting on our draft local cycling and walking infrastructure plan which will look at longer-term, permanent schemes to encourage active travel.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
GCarpes | 3 years ago
2 likes

The same is happening in Worthing now, people losing their minds over the cycle lanes being installed. There's even a petition on change.org!

Avatar
Hirsute replied to GCarpes | 3 years ago
0 likes

I used to live down that way. Where are these cycle lanes ?

Avatar
GCarpes replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

From Waitrose up to the Grove lodge roundabout, one lane has been closed off to cars and there's fixed bollards keeping bikes and cycles apart.

Avatar
Shake | 3 years ago
5 likes

You can bet your bottom dollar that the same people that are complaining about the lack of consulation were 2 years complainging about the amount of red tape the EU imposed 

Avatar
mr_pickles2 | 3 years ago
12 likes

This is just plain old shit. Consultations?? The DfT specifically said NOT to consult on changes for emergency schemes and use Experimental Traffic Orders so schemes would be put in place quickly. 

I hate how "consultations" have become so damaging and toxic to any scheme that involves removing an iota of convenience from motorists to benefit cycling and walking. It just seems to be treated as a referedum by traders who're stuck in the 90s and gammony residents who want to drive half a mile to get thier paper.

The government should be forcing major changes to roads to accomodate cycling as we simply don't have time if we're to deal with climate change and health crises; this incrementalist approach over the last 25 years has failed catastropically. We need people out of cars now.

Avatar
David9694 replied to mr_pickles2 | 3 years ago
10 likes

Here's a round-up typical me posts in local newspaper letter column comment sections. I think there is some genuine incomprehension from the letter writers that a road or a lane should be closed, also a lot of pretty underhand what aboutery about disabled drivers. 
 

Was I consulted about the situation we find ourselves in now?  Our main street busy, noisy, parked-up (pavements and all),considered by many to be “too dangerous” to cycle and toounpleasant to walk in.  Is it such a surprise that after 60 years of this building-up, many people are increasingly questioning any further development along those lines?  Have we forgotten how nice the world is when there aren’t cars? 

The car is an exclusive club – if you are too poor or too infirm to belong, you are out and are left with very little to fall back on.  Many of those in the club are burdened by obesity, high blood pressure, mishaps, expense, pollution, conflict with others, a race to keep up with the Joneses that they can never win.  That’s to say nothing of the people not in the club. 

Surprisingly, some club members are left disappointed, angry and frustrated by the experience and blame everyone except themselves for their predicament:  cyclists for taking up road-space, the Council for not building enough roads, or restricting closing a few of the roads that there are. If you are in traffic, you are traffic. 

“I have to travel four miles for work”: 20 minutes by bike, and you shouldn’t have to be a die-hard or a fanatic to do it. Take a look at the New Forest in August: people all over the country are longing to cycle. 

Car dependence been going on a long time now, is ingrained, people are addicted and simply cannot see any other way of living.  The self-generated image of the hard-pressed, victimised motorist being hounded off the roads by Lycra warriors and green fanatics doesn’t accord with the reality around us today, though.  What’s being proposed with cycle (hopefully soon to be bus lanes) and pedestrainisation really isn’t that big an ask. 

Our shopping habits, especially for non-food, have changedcompletely.  The shops of the future are going to have to offer us something we can’t get on-line – e.g. service, a unique experience.  I think that starts with creating a people-friendly shopping environment.   

Newbury, Winchester, Oxford, Salisbury – the same old story of the by-pass  or throughway being built at great exense to the envionment and the public purse, intended to remove through traffic from the town.  What happens? After a few years, both the by-pass and the town are both again choked, you end up finding ways of by-passing the by-pass.  Where does it end? 

 

Avatar
stonojnr replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
8 likes

The car dependency thing is scarily so ingrained in people now, you do get the feeling some would literally choose to die rather than just park or drive 2metres further from a shop.

A scheme in Hadleigh to make the high street one way and widen pavements was removed because some complained the barriers were ugly.

A scheme in Beccles to make a market square traffic free was removed because people complained they had lost their 'free' car parking & had to pay 70p to park their car.

What hope is there that any of this new stuff stays or that people eventually get it, when they are prepared to complain& campaign against it because it costs them 70p extra to park,whilst owning & maintaining a car.

Avatar
David9694 replied to stonojnr | 3 years ago
2 likes

70p? I'm half way through paying £355 a month for this, I can't afford 70p to park it. 

there is something about getting right the presentation of these schemes.

yes, the adject laziness we've gotten into - just nipping into this shop - is staggering when you look at and think about it. Retailers often defend it - some are desperate for any sort of trade and the thought that they might lose some it puts them into overdrive.  

Avatar
Awavey | 3 years ago
5 likes

they might be the first (at least to be reported about) reversing alot of the stuff they put in, but sadly I suspect they wont be the last. its depressing reading some of the objections to the schemes locally

Avatar
handlebarcam | 3 years ago
6 likes

Too many people refuse the inoculation against motorcar addition that is cycling for this society to develop a herd immunity like that achieved in places like the Netherlands or Copenhagen. Many will die of obesity-related illnesses, pollution, and road traffic incidents as a result.

Avatar
Simon E | 3 years ago
9 likes

And this despite:

Quote:

Keeping the pop-up “corona cycleways” installed on many main roads in European cities would result in health benefits of $3 billion a year, claims a new study from German climate-change researchers.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2020/08/18/pop-up-coronavirus-c...

One can only guess that East Sussex council - and virtually every other council in the the UK - doesn't want its people to have those health benefits.

Meanwhile Jeremy Vine tweeted today about Brighton prom:

Quote:

Let's be honest, anyone who has visited #Brighton despairs at that traffic sewer that runs alongside the beach. This is probably the moment to close the filthy seafront road completely and let this beautiful town breathe its own sea air at last.

https://twitter.com/theJeremyVine/status/1298982587369533446

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
9 likes

So depressing. The DfT is right to insist on tight timetables, but some councils just aren't up to the job.

North Yorkshire is a good example. One funded cycle route should have been built in 2018, and they still haven't done a single stroke of work on it.

They also have done nothing - zero, rien du tout - for bikes under Emergency Active Travel. They've put in a Tranche 2 bid, but there's no reason for anyone to believe they're capable of actually doing anything even if they get some money.

It's pathetic, useless incompetence. I'm really angry about it.

Avatar
Rapha Nadal | 3 years ago
15 likes

The implementation of the new cycle lanes in Brighton & Hove has caused no end of outrage for the car depend gammons who reside in our fair city.  To the point where they're arranging protest marches to show how annoyed they are - using the pavement which ensures they're nice & safe from cars obviously.

Imagine how shit your life must be if you're getting het up over people wanting to move aorund in relative safety and away from tonnes of motor vehicle.

Avatar
RoubaixCube | 3 years ago
9 likes

Surely that is fraud or at least a scam???? Because something is obtained by means of deception.

You cant just promise to do something then dont do it when you get given the funding for it.

DfT should take back HALF of the money they awarded ESCC

Because all their promises about building more infrastructure is just going to get swept under the rug again like most  "CONSULTATIONS" when it comes to the topic of active travel and especially when its regarding cycling.

I dont even live near East Sussex but i am absolutely livid about it. No doubt ESCC will line their own pockets with the money or redirect the funds to pay for other things that it wasnt intended for.

Latest Comments