Like this site? Help us to make it better.


What “Golden Age for Cycling”? The English council spending least on active travel is home to Boris Johnson’s constituency

Hillingdon Council spent just 20 pence per person on cycling and walking last year according to figures obtained by Cycling UK

A year ago today, Boris Johnson heralded “a new Golden Age for cycling” – but figures compiled by Cycling UK show that the council spending least on active travel in England is the London borough that is home to the Prime Minister’s own constituency.

According to the figures, which have been compiled ahead of today’s local elections taking place across England, the Conservative-run London Borough of Hillingdon, where Johnson’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency is located, spent a paltry 20 pence per head on active travel in 2020/21.

That put it bottom of the list of 59 councils that responded to a Freedom of Information request from the national cycling charity, and the only London borough to appear among the lowest 10 spenders.

Active travel spend 2020/21 via Cycling UK

Based on core funding plus one-off bids and grants, the top 10 includes two of the three boroughs in the capital that have made huge steps in active travel provision through the Mini Holland programme – the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames, and Waltham Forest.

Indeed, Kingston’s spend of £33.96 per head – 170 times that spent in Hillingdon – is what the Cycling & Walking Alliance, of which Cycling UK is a member, called for councils to be spending on active travel by 2025, and double the £17 that it wanted to see invested in 2020/21.

It’s also noticeable that three councils in the top 10 – Salford, Stockport and Manchester – lie within Greater Manchester, where Labour Mayor Andy Burnham, standing for re-election today, and Chris Boardman have been developing the cyclist and pedestrian-friendly Bee Network.

Johnson himself was out for a bike ride yesterday with another mayor seeking a second term – West Midlands Mayor and fellow Tory Andy Street.

Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, told “The Prime Minister’s message last year was that this would be a ‘Golden Age for cycling’, but some councils don’t seem to have received the memo, failing to put their core transport funding towards active travel, or secure grant funding, and in the case of West Sussex and Kensington, ripping out any infrastructure weeks after spending government cash to install it.

 “Of course it would help if ministers made it clearer that this is government policy, and that councils are expected to invest in active travel, but with some authorities investing 170 times more per head than others last year, it’s obvious that levels of commitment towards cycling and walking differ hugely between councils.

“So, for people in Hillingdon, within Boris Johnson’s constituency, or in Telford, Redcar or Blackburn, it might seem that the Golden Age is at the end of a very long rainbow.”

He added: “Not every local authority has elections today, but if you live in one that does, please use Cycling UK’s online action to ask your candidates whether they’ll move up the gears and pledge to invest the money needed to deliver the infrastructure that enables more people to cycle.”

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


Awavey | 3 years ago

Bit late for CyclingUK to ask people to challenge candidates on cycling pledges today, as a good chunk of people will have used postal voting so had already voted last week.

Also how are they breaking down which councils have spent money and tied it to which elections, a link to their data would help, but I know for instance Norwich havent spent much money from Norfolks government funding because they felt they already had their golden age of cycling covered. Whilst in Suffolk the majority of money went into the most populated towns,which meant some local councils appear to have spent lots whilst others spent none at all, when it was entirely a county decison where the money went as they are the local body maintaining the roads.

So theres alot of context missing in just quoting numbers as a good thing or bad thing like that imo

spen | 3 years ago

Having seen what my council plans to spend on in the coming year I wish they'd send less, or at least not spend on projects that are just embarrassingly bad and can only be thought of as an engineers vanity project

brooksby | 3 years ago

I believe that the Golden Age of Cycling fell on a Thursday this year, between 2.30 and 2.45 pm.

Latest Comments