Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
21 comments
But the car had registration plates and according to Mr Freeman that solves all problems related to..... oh sorry no it doesn't solve all problems related to bicycles does it, because tossers like him in cars can just drive away without a care in the world for the damage they just caused with their car fitted with registration plates that don't work.
In my opinion the driver should be taking extra care around a young rider and slowing down accordingly. If the collision was enough to remove the mirror then this could not have been the case.
The depressing thing here is that even if they are caught all that will happen is a caution at most. How the government thinks it's going to get more people cycling is beyond me. May be its just words.
It's amazing how reckless some drivers are even around young children.
We got close passed the other day by a tractor towing a trailer. My young daughter on her tag bike was screaming.
Unfortunately I don't have a camera and no independent witnesses.
I know that road. It's a straight bit of road and not one with poor forward visibility. I can't see how a driver couldn't see a cyclist ahead.
I hope the woman cyclist recovers.
Don't worry - I'm sure Socrati or NZ will be along soon to explain how it was the cyclist's fault...
It's a door mirror, not a "wing" mirror.
you're really going to choose that as your hill to die on?
Could have been this honda
Nope, side mirror if we want to be technical and most commonly referred to as wing mirror by pretty much any mechanic or general person in the street.
Do an exercise. Go into google and type in door mirror and see what is returned. Then type in Side Mirror and then Wing Mirror.
People also call VED "road tax" and V5 documents as "log books" though. Wing mirrors went out decades ago - they are door mirrors now.
This the only door mirror I could find on the internet. At least this will sort out the blind spot. It appears you are raising pedantry to another level. Shame you didn't show concern for the lass or her daughter. Good luck on your hill.
Despite the fact that research found that looking into a wing mirror took much less time than looking in a door mirror.
It's a V5C, not a V5.
i look forward to your upcoming campaign against telephone icons on business cards and speed camera signs
I've never seen a telephone icon on a speed camera sign.
brooksby sometimes it is the cyclist's fault.
It's incredibly unlikely to be in this case.
I hope she heals well and fast and that they get the driver who did this terrble driving. ;-(
There are some on Twitter quite capable of saying "tsk. what was she even doing out on a bike on a road like that, putting her child in danger" it doesn't need aid from you.
The woman that knocked me off in 2007 on a roundabout would have loved it to have been my fault - she certainly went to the police afterwards with a complete pack of lies to the effect that it was - thank goodness for the other motorist who saw what happened.
the story is in the local newspaper, someone quite likely to be local has a missing/damaged -ahem - nearside mirror on their silver car, so I really hope the net closes in on them, if they're too damned low to come forward.
EDIT : posted Thursday night and I swear on my brazed lugs that I hadn't seen the Good Moaning Britain schedule for Friday! Calling, Dave, I don't expect you to pay me for my doggerel, but for this amount of prescience, let's at least call it quits. What d'you say?
And the jettisoning of a mirror makes a noticeable noise.
This driver
1. Drove too close to a pair of cyclists ( I'll put my neck on the line and presume the cyclist did not veer 1.5m into the overtaking car's path )
2. Heard/felt the mirror detach but did not stop to see if the cyclist was hit, injured, laying in the carriageway
3. Continued their journey with an obviously missing mirror apparent to them from the driving position during rear view checks, but still did not return to check what had happened.
I'm already guessing they are indeed "too damned low"
Exactly what happened to me last September... You described it well.... without camera footage or reg number.....Cambs plod were not interested
in the New Forest, we get a lot of animal collisions - hitting a pony causes a lot of damage to your car, it must be pretty unmistakeable yet a lot of it is hit and run and you never hear of anyone being held to account.
"the worse roads for animal collisions are the two busiest roads" - wow, what was your first clue? An average speed detection zone, like on the A428 between Bedford and Northampton* would help, yet is never enacted, strangely.
*Installed to control that other breed of MAMIL: middle aged men in leathers.
Not if it's in Northamptonshire, speed cameras were decommissioned years ago.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/1297519/speed-camera-fixed-roa...