An Edinburgh woman who cycled home on what she thought was her own bike after a big night out in the Scottish capital is now seeking its rightful owner.
The woman, named Rachel, realised her mistake when she found the bike locked to her own one at her home the following morning.
But her recollection of the events that led to her securing an inadvertent n+1 are sketchy, to say the least, following what sounds like a bit of a Friday evening out.
Posting to local Facebook group The Meadows Share on Saturday, she said: “Has someone had their bike stolen last night?
“When I woke up today I had a flashback of myself cycling back home from Haymarket station. I didn’t take my bike with me last night as I went out with an Uber.
“I checked my photos and found out I was not going bananas. I have a bike secured together with my bike downstairs. I think I found it unattached somewhere in Haymarket station and decided to cycle home?!
“I would like to return it to the owner as I’m sure they’ll love to have it back. Let me know if your bike is missing please!”
She said that the bike seemed to have been left unlocked – there was a D-lock attached to the rear rack.
“Also, found a number on a sticker on the frame, checked the bike register, but no luck,” she added.
“I’ll keep searching for the owner until Wednesday, then I’m free to take the bike to the police lost and found on Fettes Avenue,” she later posted.
“I was in no shape to move from the sofa yesterday,” she revealed, with what we assume is some deghree of understatement.
Speaking to The Edinburgh Tab, she said: “As a cyclist myself, I feel bad that I have someone’s bike and I can’t seem to find the owner.
https://thetab.com/uk/edinburgh/2021/11/02/a-woman-who-drunkenly-stole-a...
“But on the other hand, I want to believe that even while drunk, I took the bike to keep it safe and find the owner. I think that’s why I secured it by attaching it to my own bike with my lock.
“I guess drunk me thought I could find the owner through social media?!”
She said that she would keep updating the Facebook page in the hope of finding the owner.
“I don’t understand why the D lock is there,” she continued. “Did the owner forget to lock the bike? Did someone steal the bike from a garden and dump it in Haymarket?”
Many of us, of course, will have had evenings out that require a bit of piecing together the following day – though possibly not involving coming home on a stranger’s bike.
“It’s actually very intriguing and I really need to find the owner so they can solve the mystery for me!” she added.
Add new comment
14 comments
If it was your bike, you'd not be worrying about what state she was in. You'd be thinking "which thieving **** stole my bike"
If she does end up taking it to the Police "lost and found", how does she explain the circumstances without incriminating herself on drunk in charge?
I would guess that they'd need evidence that she was over the limit or incapable should they wish to press charges. Can't imagine there are many coppers who would in that circumstance
I believe when it comes to bicycles, the definition is "under the influence of drink or a drug to such an extent as to be incapable of having proper control of it."
Given that she apparently made it home safely, there is no evidence that she did not have proper control of the bike.
If you were to walk into a police station and claim you drove home drunk three days ago, there wouldn't be much they could really do without any actual evidence apart from your confession, so that wouldn't be the issue.
If I were a police office, I might be more tempted to suspect a bike thief having regrets and wanting to return it withouth consequences.
Very dangerous riding a bicycle when drunk without a traffic cone on your head for protection.
And lights
Definitely need a roadworks light on a tripod over your shoulder
I prefer to wear mine on top of the cone ...
I can certainly see the advantages of such a set up. Might try it myself
Traffic cones count as hi vis.
When I was a student, a friend of mine - coming home from a night out - saw a bike locked with a lock that looked like his. He tried his key in it and it worked, so (drunk logic) he rode it home. He took it back the next day.
Hoping the owner had not returned to it in the mean time? Because If I returned to where I'd left my bike and it was not there, I would not check back again later to see if it had magically returned.
Indeed. This was more than 30 years, so the details are a little hazy.
If you worked in IT perhaps you would
"Turn it off and back on again, see if it works".