At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I'm sure I will be chastised for this view but...most of the people who go to takeaways aren't walking there or cycling there. They are driving. Go...
I know the Limes made a mess, but my inner self sees a bicycle commuter porn image.
The 6 is an S in PNP-speak, I think. ...
Belgium is lawless and they don't give a fig. They also hate their neighbours, as do their neighbours hate them. They cannot even speak Dutch...
Thats if you believe that a slightly bigger bearing surface translates in any meaningful way to "pedaling stiffness" which to my mind is the...
Everyone carrying more / brighter searchlights will fix things? Perhaps it helps sometimes, but I think this leads to other issues. We're already...
Lake's naming and sizing: never knowingly comprehensible. Good shoes, baffling range.
Yeah, I doubt if Arron Banks would be happy visiting "little Somalia" (as he referred to Bristol) and certainly I don't think Bristol's residents...
Not enough, evidently.
It could be used as a reliable comparison without any calculations.