At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Rendel, strange that you are using the telegraph's version of this story, are you feeling alright?
They need a lot of waste bins, "NFA" forms, people to review all the rejections to certify they are justified and giant storage space to hold the...
It's interesting (as a pattern)....
I like their stuff. And the better half seems to think it's suitable for pressies, last b'day was a super light ss jersey, and it's lovely. Wearing...
I can foresee Kask's PR department getting busy in response to this....
So it was a gang dispute not an attack on (e)bikers.
Can we agree that a manufacturer refusing to sell you a component if your bike isn't good enough means we've finally reached peak bike snobbery? ;¬...
Possibly. The one-way charge was only about £80 on top of the normal charges, which is a lot less than I've come across in the US for an equivalent...
That's my cue, I believe......
Came to this late; nearly posted the same!